Best regards
Name / Gerges Francis Tawdrous – Egyptian – Christian– Single - 1974
Faculty / Physics & Mathematics – Peoples' Friendship Universityof Russia
Contact / +201022532292
CV / http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail / [email protected]
(Moon Orbit Triangle http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0082)
Research Paper " Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?"
Because
(Earth orbital distance / Earth moon distance) = (sun diameter/ moon diameter)
Now the next question will be
Is there a geometrical reason causes the previous equation, or it's found by pure coincidences?
For 7 years (2013-2019) I have tried to answer this question… and I know the answer now
Yes
There's a geometrical reason behind the previous equation and it can't be found by any pure coincidence…..
Now when I reach to this conclusion, I have realized that, the astrophysics book should be changed radically! We need to see that as deeply as possible
The main point behind this argument is the question…. How the matter is created? And because this question isn't answered yet, the astrophysics theories depend on imagination more than the facts…! And that cause to create an imaginary description about the solar group …
In fact
The Solar Planets Data Analysis can provide a real description in place of the imaginary one.. but that also means we have to rewrite the astrophysics book!
Let's use one example for better explanation
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? By gravity…the gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
URANUS DIAMETER IS GREATER THAN NEPTUNE DIAMETER,
where
NEPTUNE MASS IS GREATER THAN URANUS…
That tells us the solar planets order is done Depending On The Diameter And Not On The Mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
This was only one example…
Now let's return to our question… why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
Please read my arguments
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0091
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0322
with the best greetings and kind regards
Gerges Francis Twadrous Curriculum Vitae
http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
or
https://www.academia.edu/38285624/Gerges_Francis_Tawdrous_Curriculum_Vitae_.doc
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/gerges-francis-tawdrous-curriculum-vitae
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
CV http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail [email protected]
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous