14/02/2024
Uma tonelada de autores redescobrindo a roda! Deram o nome de "Affectome" para o que eu chamei de Sentiomics há 3 anos!
“Towards an Integrated Understanding ofthe Human Affectome”
Abstract "Over the last decades, the interdisciplinary field of the affective sciences has seen proliferation rather than integration of theoretical perspectives. This is due to differences in metaphysical and mechanistic assumptions about human affective phenomena (what they are and how they work) which, shaped by academic motivations and values, have determined the affective constructs and operationalizations. An assumption on the purpose of affective phenomena can be used as a teleological principle to guide the construction of a common set of metaphysical and mechanistic assumptions—a framework for human affective research. In this capstone paper for the special issue, we gather the tiered purpose of human affective phenomena to synthesize assumptions that account for human affective phenomena collectively. This teleologically-grounded framework offers a principled agenda and launchpad for both organizing existing perspectives and generating new ones. Ultimately, we hope Human Affectome brings us a step closer to not only an integrated understanding of human affective phenomena, but an integrated field for affective research.
Key Words: affect, framework, enactivism, allostasis, feeling, sensation, emotion, mood, wellbeing, valence,arousal, motivation, stress
Introduction The affective sciences—the interdisciplinary study of affective phenomena, such as sensation, emotion,mood, and wellbeing—have their roots in neuroscience and psychology, but also intersect withphilosophy, sociology, linguistics, anthropology, computer science, and economics (Ekman and Davidson, 1994; LeDoux, 1998; Panksepp, 2004; Davidson and Sutton, 1995; Damasio, 2005; Davidsonet al., 2009; Kleinginna and Kleinginna, 1981; Sander and Scherer, 2009; Dalgleish et al., 2009; Gendronet al., Adolphs and Anderson, 2018; Gross and Barrett, 2013; Keltner and Lerner, 2010; Gordon, 2017; Solomon, 1978; Lutz and White, 1986; Mesquita et al., 1992; Beatty, 2014, 2019; Armony andVuilleumier, 2013; Solomon, 1993; Goldie, 2009; Deonna and Teroni, 2012; Scarantino, 2016; Picard,2000; Hoque et al., 2011; Calvo et al., 2015; Dukes et al., 2021). This interdisciplinary field seeks to explain the mechanisms of affective phenomena by inferring affective constructs from observable data, in order to predict future effects (Mill, 1856; Whewell, 1858; Machamer et al., 2000; Glennan, 2002, 2008;Azzouni, 2004; Bechtel and Abrahamsen, 2005; Chang, 2005; Morganti and Tahko, 2017; Ivanova andFarr, 2020; Levenstein et al., 2023; Hempel and Oppenheim, 1948; Hempel, 1965; Kauffman, 1971;Glennan, 1996), a scientific endeavor that has gained traction in the last few decades and secured the riseof affective research (Dukes et al., 2021). This growth, however, has been accompanied by a surge intheoretical divisions: divergent academic communities differ in their background assumptions on themetaphysics of affective phenomena (i.e., what they are), (Marr, 2010; Danziger, 1997; Dayan andAbbott, 2005; Dixon, 2003, 2012; Solomon, 2008; Goldie, 2009; Deonna and Scherer, 2010; Izard, 2010a,2010b; Gendron, 2010; Mulligan and Scherer, 2012; Barrett, 2012; Scarantino, 2012, 2016; Adolphs,2017; Fox, 2018; Tappolet, 2022; Moors, 2022) which further distances their assumptions about themechanism of those phenomena (i.e., how affective phenomena arise) (Scherer, 2005; Bridgman, 1927;Chang, 2004; Levenstein et al., 2023). These assumptions frame the basic terms of a theory, such as eachtheory’s affective constructs, the scientific abstractions of affective phenomena that should be used..."
PDF | On Nov 1, 2023, Daniela Schiller and others published The Human Affectome | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
