21/03/2026
There is a silent contradiction running through Brazil—and perhaps it is one of the hardest to confront. It is often said that it is the people who change a country. But that is only half true. Those who truly have the power to transform a nation are the citizens who have had access to formal education—those who understand the law, who can interpret it, who have the intellectual tools to question it and, above all, to act.
And that is precisely where we stumble.
Because those who understand the rules should be the first to respect them. Those who know their rights should also set an example in fulfilling their duties. Yet, more often than not, we see the opposite: education, which should elevate behavior, is sometimes used to justify small transgressions, rationalize shortcuts, and soften mistakes.
Complaining about the government, corruption, and the country’s structural problems—this is easy, almost automatic. What is difficult is maintaining, in everyday life, a commitment to the basics. A society is not built only on grand speeches or occasional outrage; it is sustained by adherence to the minimum rules of coexistence.
Not parking in a space reserved for people with disabilities if you are not one. Not cutting in line. Not taking advantage where you shouldn’t. Not treating public space as an extension of your home—or worse, as if it belonged to no one.
It may seem like little. But it isn’t.
Because the failure is not only in large structures—it lies in the small gestures repeated every day, especially by those who should know better. And when the so-called “educated class” fails at this, it doesn’t just make a mistake: it legitimizes the mistake. It teaches, through silent example, that knowing the rule does not imply respecting it.
And so the country does not change.
Not for lack of laws, nor for lack of discourse, but because of a kind of everyday inconsistency—where those who could lead by example choose, consciously or not, to be part of the problem.
Changing a country requires more than awareness. It requires coherence.
And perhaps that is precisely what we still lack.