Better Planning Network

NEW BPN FACEBOOK PAGE

Due to ongoing issues with the old BPN page, we have now moved to a whole new FB page.

www.facebook.com/betterplanningnetworkinc

Please follow and like us on our new page. We'll put up lots of posts for you to consider and comment on.

See you there.

Exclusive:*
**Secret briefings on climate national security risk**
“No one is officially telling Australian people that we have officially passed 1.5 degrees,” says the independent member for Warringah. “The question now is, how much below two degrees can we stay?

“Most experts are saying we’re actually on track for 2.6 to three degrees. Now, that is catastrophic in some areas. So, I think it’s recklessly negligent of either major party to fail to properly inform the Australian people of the risk ahead.”

https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/environment/2025/03/15/exclusive-secret-briefings-climate-national-security-risk

*The government invited only the progressive independents – excluding the Greens, the Coalition and the relevant parliamentary committee – to a briefing on the still-unpublished Climate Risk Assessment report.*

Karen Barlow is The Saturday Paper’s chief political correspondent.
March 15, 2025

“Frankly terrifying” is how independent Senator David Pocock sees the external national security threat of climate change to Australia.

He’s seen the unreleased report on the risks, and he and progressive independents in the house say it is “recklessly negligent” not to let Australians know as well. The Saturday Paper can reveal that on December 9, a non-sitting day of parliament, the crossbenchers dialled in to a secure meeting to be briefed on the Office of National Intelligence’s (ONI) long-awaited Climate Risk Assessment report. The report was delivered to the government in early 2023.

The Coalition and the Greens were not briefed, nor was the usually bipartisan Joint Parliamentary Committee on Intelligence and Security.

The Greens say the independents are now gagged as to the report’s contents, but it is an issue that will weigh heavily in any negotiations with the cross bench in the event of a hung parliament. This leaves the Greens less informed than the independents on an issue core to the party’s campaign, heading into an election that most reputable polls point to delivering a hung parliament.

“We’re woefully underprepared for what’s coming,” Pocock tells The Saturday Paper. “It’s no surprise that the government has been sitting on this report from the Office of National Intelligence.

“After hustling the government for the last few years, they gave crossbenchers a private briefing on it and it’s frankly terrifying, what our national security agencies are telling us is coming, and government is not acting,” the senator says. “I think it is actually negligence from both of them.”

Pocock is referring to both Labor and the Coalition as Australia inches closer to a federal election that must be held by May 17, but which has been delayed by Tropical Cyclone Alfred hitting Australia’s east coast far further south than usual.

Nevertheless, climate change is largely being framed in the pre-campaign as a debate about energy prices in a cost-of-living crisis.

Anthony Albanese says he listens to science and recognises the impact of climate change on Australia’s weather patterns. “I take climate change seriously and my government takes climate change seriously,” the prime minister told reporters as Alfred approached the coast.

Yet an update to the separate, more domestically focused National Climate Risk Assessment is also well overdue.

The national security risks associated with climate change should be shared with Australians, says Zali Steggall.

“No one is officially telling Australian people that we have officially passed 1.5 degrees,” says the independent member for Warringah. “The question now is, how much below two degrees can we stay?

“Most experts are saying we’re actually on track for 2.6 to three degrees. Now, that is catastrophic in some areas. So, I think it’s recklessly negligent of either major party to fail to properly inform the Australian people of the risk ahead.”

The independents – including Andrew Wilkie and Helen Haines – are not talking about the contents of the ONI report, which was ordered by Labor soon after taking office and led by Australia’s most senior intelligence chief, ONI Director-General Andrew Shearer, with input from the Department of Defence.

Albanese, the minister responsible for the ONI, has been adamant in the past that “considerable material” on climate risk is already publicly available, including the warning in the declassified version of the “2023 Defence Strategic Review” that climate change may “significantly increase the risk of conflict in the region”.

When Richard Marles, the deputy prime minister and defence minister, took questions on Cyclone Alfred in a press conference last week, reporters raised the increasing use of the Australian Defence Force for disaster response as natural disasters become more frequent and more intense – a key concern in the strategic review.

“In a macro sense, we needed to be thinking about how we supported all of our governmental efforts in terms of responding to natural disasters and ensuring that Defence was the last port of call,” Marles told reporters.

“It is obviously going to be the case and will always be the case while we are here, that Defence will be there ready to provide support when they have unique assets that can be provided.”

The ONI assessment offers a different perspective on the effect of climate change, however: that of Australia looking out to the world.

While the member for Goldstein, Zoe Daniel, says the report – now a couple of years old – is already in need of updating, she agrees that “there’s a really strong case for a declassified version of this kind of information being released”.

The independents were not allowed to bring any staff into the December 9 briefing, which took place after federal parliament rose for 2024. Daniel said the briefing was the result of the cross bench’s persistence, and the deputy prime minister agreeing to one.

“I don’t think any of us would have been particularly surprised by what we heard, given how engaged we are with this particular range of issues and impacts on climate. But still, it’s important to get the actual facts.”

Over almost two years, the independents, along with Greens Senator David Shoebridge, have argued reports similar to that from the ONI in the United States and Britain are publicly available. Those reports talk of sea-level rise impacting naval bases, increased risk of global unrest, global supply breakdowns, the growing concern over climate refugees, and the opening of sea routes previously covered by sea ice.

They warn that the reduction in sea ice “already is amplifying strategic competition in the Arctic over access to its natural resources” and there will be strain on global energy and food systems.

Germany last month published its own National Interdisciplinary Climate Risk Assessment warning the climate crisis is the “biggest security challenge of our time” and that a “mix of violence and climate crisis is forcing more and more people around the world to leave their homes”.

Shoebridge is not happy the ONI climate risk report is still classified and he sees selective briefings as a gag.

“Both Labor and Coalition are notorious for offering confidential briefings to their opponents as a way of silencing public criticism,” he tells The Saturday Paper.

“In this case, credible security experts have made it clear this ONI report has likely made very strong statements linking climate change with national security. However, once you are told that in a confidential briefing, this effectively gags you from saying that again because you had that reinforced in secret.”

The Saturday Paper sought an interview with Marles on the reasoning behind the selective briefings, but he declined.

In response to questions sent to both the prime minister and the deputy prime minister, a spokesperson for Albanese sent a statement saying the “Albanese government is committed to action on climate change”.

“We engage constructively with the crossbench, and that engagement includes regular briefings,” the statement read. “Some briefings are confidential, and we trust that confidentiality is respected.”

The former chief of the ADF, retired Admiral Chris Barrie, has not seen the report but wants it in the public sphere after he encouraged Labor to commission it as part of the Australian Security Leaders Climate Group.

“They grabbed hold of the idea, put it in the Powering Australia platform for election in 2022 and it’s sort of fizzled out,” Barrie tells The Saturday Paper.

He has an idea about the contents.

“I think the thing that would be most terrifying was the concept that displaced people from other countries would want to come here,” Barrie says. He cites the case of Bangladesh, which faces losing close to a fifth of its territory to rising sea levels by 2050, including a third of its agricultural land.

Years ago, he says, he estimated that as many as 40 million displaced Bangladeshis may be unable to find homes in overcrowded neighbouring countries and, over time, would be seeking refuge in places like Australia.

The climate risk report by the US National Intelligence Council, one of a number of published government and non-government security assessments, shows the superpower assessing high risks to US interests of cross-border migration by 2030, and water tension and conflict by 2040. It expects increasing geopolitical tensions as countries argue over these issues and how to pay for the world’s decarbonisation. It expects countries to compete to control resources and dominate new clean energy technologies.

Former US special envoy for climate change Jonathan Pershing, who has been in Australia for Climate Action Week Sydney, says the sheer cost of addressing these challenges has been a motivating factor for making such information public in the US.

“I think that you’ve got some sense that there’s going to be a financial cost to mitigating that risk,” the program director of environment at the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation tells The Saturday Paper. “And in order for congress to be aware, they can always get a confidential report, but often those things do have a public dimension as well, and congress is interested in public reactions when they have to spend money.

“I don’t think it tends to reveal the kind of confidential preparedness information. That’s material that I’m sure is being done that could be fully classified and you would not see it in the public domain.”

But the Climate Risk Assessment report is not the full picture of risks to Australia from climate change. There is also the separate commission of a domestic National Climate Risk Assessment, the first pass of which came out in March last year, with the government’s assistant minister for climate change, Josh Wilson, identifying that “basically everything” is at significant risk because of climate change.

Minister for Climate Change Chris Bowen describes the risk assessments as the “foundation for our climate response for years to come”. The government said in November that the second-pass assessment was under way and will be a “deeper quantitative analysis of the top 11 priority risks”.

Barrie wants to know where it is.

“The second pass report from that domestic risk assessment was supposed to be delivered in December last. Guess what? We haven’t seen it, and we haven’t heard of it, and as far as I’m aware, it’s been buried,” he says.

The Saturday Paper understands that the work on the second pass assessment has apparently proved more complex than expected, and it is nearing finalisation with a view to being released soon.

These criticisms come as the Coalition accuses the Albanese government of sitting on a review of Australia’s spy agencies by senior public servants Heather Smith and Richard Maude.

The 2023 commissioned report was delivered to government eight months ago, and officially the government is still considering its response. The last review, the 2017 L’Estrange–Merchant review, led to the creation of the ONI.

The 2017 report mentions “climate change pressures” among resource security concerns, and irregular migration of people as contributing to “heightened tensions and instabilities that are affecting nations’ perceptions of their security”.

Albanese came to power promising to end the climate wars. The fight between the major parties on climate action continues, and importantly, while renewable energy is being rolled out at a determined pace, Australia remains heavily reliant on coal and gas, with more fossil-fuel project approvals pending.

Looking beyond this election, Zali Steggall has proposed a private member’s bill that would legislate regular, independent and public National Climate Risk Assessments, force the government of the day to have detailed adaptation plans, and the Climate Change Authority to do yearly implementation reports around that planning.

“It’s like having a security assessment that tells us our armed forces are 50 per cent too small but not having any kind of plan in play for the next five to 10 years to increase our capacity. It’s the same thing.

“We have to start investing in that preparation and adaptation.”

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on March 15, 2025 as "Exclusive: Secret briefings on climate national security risk".

Exclusive: Secret briefings on climate national security risk The government invited only the progressive independents – excluding the Greens, the Coalition and the relevant parliamentary committee – to a briefing on the still-unpublished Climate Risk Assessment report.

COUNCIL'S HERITAGE CONCERNS OVERRIDDEN

Deicorp’s 22-storey Crows Nest proposal has been approved by the NSW Independent Planning Commission after it was rejected by the North Sydney Council, according to The Urban Developer.
The commission greenlit the development by the prolific Sydney developer late last month.

The council argued that it should be reduced to 16 storeys as per an original application, that the tower and podium had “excessive bulk and scale” which would impact on surrounding heritage and conservation areas, causing overshadowing and loss of solar access, and also complained of “excess” parking. However, the commission disagreed.

Read the full article here - https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/independent-planning-commission-crows-nest-deicorp-approval

The Commission's decision highlights the wider community's concerns about whether councils will be able to protect heritage, as reassured by the NSW Government when it introduced the Transport Orientated Development scheme (TOD).

What do you think? Is Sydney's heritage at risk from all the new planning schemes being introduced?

Photo: Urban Developer newsletter

COULD THE LA FIRES HAPPEN IN A MAJOR AUSTRALIAN CITY?

The short answer is yes.

Australian doesn't have Santa Ana winds, of course, but we do have downslope winds (a wind that comes over a topographic barrier like a mountain range). They are often very dry and warm and can move quickly.

There is the possibility for fires to burn into Australian suburbs. It happened in Canberra in 2003. And it could happen again in a major city such as Sydney or Melbourne. We have all the ingredients.

If you have the wrong wind and the wrong fire and the wrong time, a fire can be driven very quickly into an urban area.
The degree to which it would spread depends on the suburban landscape and how well prepared the area is.

If a suburb has older housing stock with older gardens, for instance, it’s absolutely ripe for a fire to spread quickly. If you have more modern housing stock (which is usually better at defending against ember attack), if the houses are more spaced apart and the gardens are clearer, then you might be OK.

When fire gets into suburbs, the damage can be variable. Some houses might burn down and others may survive. But the worst case scenario is what is called “house-to-house ignition ”, where the houses become the fuel.

The other frightening dimension is what happens if water supplies run out, which is reportedly happening in some parts of Los Angeles.

Read the full article in The Conversation here - https://theconversation.com/la-is-on-fire-how-will-australia-cope-when-bushfires-hit-sydney-melbourne-or-another-major-city-246967

Is the push for increased density in our bushfire prone outer suburbs a recipe for disaster? What do you think?

Photo: EPA/Allison Dinner

OPEN THE DOOR ON CLOSED COUNCIL MEETINGS, says Minister Ron Hoenig MP

Speaking to Government News, Hoenig said: “Private councillor briefing sessions have been repeatedly highlighted by ICAC as a corruption risk.”

Hoenig was responding to the local government peak body’s resistance to a briefing ban. LGNSW president Darriea Turley said private briefing sessions provided opportunities for councillors to ask questions of staff which may be too sensitive to ask or respond to in public.

In reply, Hoenig told GN: “I understand some councils have raised concerns about needing to deal with confidential or legal matters privately. The legislation already provides exceptions for these matters to be dealt with in closed meetings and I am not proposing any changes to this.”

He added: “What I want to see is when councillors are being briefed on issues that impact the community, this is happening in an open, legally constituted committee meeting in the presence of the press and the public – not behind closed doors. Private briefing sessions have eroded transparency in local government and limited the opportunity for public scrutiny over council decision making.”

Submissions are still being accepted until 28 February 2025.

Read the full article here - https://www.governmentnews.com.au/open-the-door-on-closed-meetings-says-local-government-minister

What do you think?

BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS REGIONAL CONFERENCE

A one-day conference, movie screening and 1/2-day field trip taking a deep-dive into the Leard Forest. It will explore biodiversity offsets and what they are.

Speakers include:
Brendan Sydes, National Biodiversity Policy Lead, Australian Conservation Foundation
The Hon Sue Higginson MLC (Greens), NSW Legislative Council
Kirsty Ruddock, Managing Lawyer, Safe Climate Corporate & Commercial team, Environmental Defender’s Office
Maria Matthes, Threatened Species Conservation Ecologist, Healing History and Koala rescuer, researcher, advocate and educator

The conference is organised by the Wando Conservation & Cultural Centre Inc, Narrabri and supported by the NSW Nature Conservation Council, taking place on Gomeroi Traditional Land. It is for environmental governance professionals, academics, ecologists, scientists and conservationists about the problems and consequences with biodiversity offsetting.

To register to attend: https://nwprotectionadvocacy.com/biodiversity-offsets-conference

INTRODUCING THE NEW BPN COMMITTEE

We are excited to advise we have a newly elected BPN Committee from our 2024 AGM. We can’t wait to collaborate with each of you in the upcoming year.

In recent news, Opposition Leader Mark Speakman has extended an invitation to work alongside the Labor Party to review and supposedly 'modernise’ our planning laws. The focus is on implementing changes for faster delivery of development. Roundtable bipartisan discussions are slated for February. You can read more about it at the following link - https://nswliberal.org.au/mark-speakman/news/nsw-opposition-welcomes-premier’s-interest-in-bipa

As part of this review, we anticipate a rewriting of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 which has already undergone numerous amendments since its inception. Notably, the 2018 revisions made significant changes, reducing the Act to nearly half its original size. You can explore the details of the Act - https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1979-203/lh.

Innumerable changes over the years have eroded many of the important principles of the EP&A Act. We must remain vigilant for any future changes that are in favour of deregulation. We have all seen the problems created by a lack of building oversight. Deregulation in planning can lead to lowering of housing standards and, by diminishing local government input in steering development, erase the distinct characteristics of local areas which are essential for fostering a community’s sense of place and belonging.

Recent legislation such as the Transport Orientated Development (TODs) has shown a disregard for community participation and protection of heritage and environmental values in planning. While we accept the EP&A Act and various NSW Government regulations, policies and plans could do with streamlining, this must not come at the cost of the community's amenity. Improvements not dismantling of the Act is what is needed.

We believe this is a pivotal moment for our community, and we strongly encourage your involvement as information is released. Let's ensure our voices are heard. Let’s embark on this journey together! If you know of any like-minded groups or individuals that are currently not BPN members, please encourage them to join us so that their views are taken into consideration - https://betterplanningnetwork.org.au/take-action/become-a-bpn-member

Warm regards,
The BPN Committee

Become a Member/Join - Better Planning Network Membership categories Steps to join or renew 1. Complete the relevant application form: BPN Individual Membership Form – Download Here BPN Group Membership Form – Download Here 2. Pay the applicable fee by direct deposit to the BPN account.   Account name: Better Planning Network Bank: Bank ...

AFFORDABLE HOUSING QUOTAS CUT

Sydney's new high-rise housing hubs promised affordable options. Now the quotas have been cut Thousands of new homes will be built near transport hubs across Sydney to help ease the housing crisis, however there are questions about whether the precincts will allow for enough affordable housing.