PrincipalNgari

PrincipalNgari I am a passionate school leader who is invested in providing an education that is worth having.

Inspired.
31/05/2026

Inspired.

January 1998. The Golden Globes carpet was a storm of flashbulbs.
Kate Winslet was 22 years old, standing next to Leonardo DiCaprio in a black lace gown that photographers couldn’t stop shooting. Behind her was the biggest movie of her life. Titanic had just opened, and it was about to collect 11 Oscars and break every box-office record that mattered.
She was nominated for Best Actress. On paper, it was the night every actor dreams about.
Then a microphone came in close.
“You look a little melted and poured into that dress,” the interviewer said. “You should’ve worn something two sizes larger.”
Kate kept the smile. She kept posing. What else does a 22-year-old do when the whole world is watching?
She didn’t know that one throwaway line would follow her for the next 26 years.

The truth is, the body shaming started long before Titanic. In drama school in England, a teacher took her aside and told her flat out, “Listen, Kate. If you’re going to look like this, you’ll have to settle for the fat girl parts.”
Years later, her answer was quiet and steel: “I was never even fat. It made me think, I’ll just show you. Quietly.”
That sentence became her blueprint.

After Titanic, tabloids on both sides of the Atlantic turned her body into content. Made-up diets. Punchlines on late-night TV about how Jack could’ve fit on the door if Kate had been smaller. She was 5’6”, completely healthy, completely normal. None of that mattered. The narrative was written.

But Kate didn’t do what they expected.
She didn’t hold press conferences. She didn’t sob on talk shows. She made choices. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Little Children. The Reader. Complicated women, messy lives, no corsets. She let the work speak while the noise kept shouting.

Then in 2003, something broke her silence. British GQ put her on the cover, but not her. Her legs were lengthened. Her waist was airbrushed down to nothing. Her actual body had been deleted without asking.
This time she spoke.
“The retouching is excessive,” she said publicly. “I don’t look like that, and more importantly, I don’t want to.”
That was the first “no” the world heard. It wasn’t the last.

In 2015, she signed with Lancôme, owned by L’Oréal, and wrote one line into the contract: no retouching of her images. Period. “Free of any additional editing,” she called it.
“I think we have a responsibility to the younger generation of women,” she told reporters.
She wasn’t just talking. She was putting it in ink, one contract at a time.

By 2021, the ink had turned into power.
On Mare of Easttown, the director mentioned he could edit out a “little bulgy bit of belly” in a scene. Kate’s answer was instant: “Don’t you dare.”
When the promotional posters came back with her face smoothed, she sent them back. Twice. “Guys, I know how many lines I have by the side of my eye. Put them all back.”
She wasn’t requesting anymore. She was directing.
The show exploded. Not despite the lines and the softness, but because of them. People were hungry for a face that hadn’t been lied about.

In 2024, while shooting Lee, the biopic of war photographer Lee Miller, a crew member gently suggested she “sit up straighter” in a bikini scene to hide her stomach.
Kate called it absolutely bizarre. “Lee wasn’t doing pilates. She was eating bread and cheese and drinking wine. Of course her body would be soft.”

Then on December 1, 2024, on 60 Minutes, they played that old red carpet clip for her. She watched 22-year-old Kate get humiliated on live TV. And finally, she cried.
“It’s absolutely appalling,” she said. “What kind of person does that to a young actress who’s just trying to figure it out?”
She admitted she’d tracked some of those critics down years later. “I told them, I hope this haunts you. And it wasn’t just for me. It was for everyone who got treated like that.”

At 22, the world told her how she should look. At 49, she tells the world how it will see her. Not with speeches, but with clauses. Not with rage, but with quiet refusals stacked one on top of another until “human” wasn’t up for debate.

As Kate put it: “We don’t call men brave for growing a beard. It’s not brave to have wrinkles or a soft stomach. It’s just being human.”
She’s right. But sometimes being human takes power. And Kate Winslet spent 26 years building it, one “no” at a time.

APPA Summit today - @ Parliament House.
25/05/2026

APPA Summit today - @ Parliament House.

Sometimes we need to share our thinking to stimulate real change…….. with Josh Teague - Member for Heysen
14/05/2026

Sometimes we need to share our thinking to stimulate real change…….. with Josh Teague - Member for Heysen

Loved being part of this important work.
07/05/2026

Loved being part of this important work.

👉 SASSLA and SAPPA - South Australian Primary Principals Association have jointly prepared a School-Based Preschool Report to better understand the current realities of school-based preschools and identify policy opportunities to support their continued development.

It is increasingly evident that, while the model remains highly effective, it operates within a system that has not kept pace with the scale of change in early-years policy, regulation, and expectations. Over time, the regulatory environment, accountability settings, and operational demands placed on school-based preschools have expanded significantly. However, the underlying funding models, leadership structures, and policy frameworks have remained largely unchanged.

🔗 Read the report now https://sassla.au/current-issues/school-based-preschool-report-2026/

17/04/2026

Can’t wait to try these out!

17/04/2026

What do you think? 🤔
I’m wondering where the line is?
What happens to children who assault an adult before grade 6?
What alternates do we need in our system to support these children and their families?

How can we teach fundamental knowledge more effectively? Gone are the days of 10 week projects - Fluency Reads twice per...
17/04/2026

How can we teach fundamental knowledge more effectively?
Gone are the days of 10 week projects - Fluency Reads twice per day embed knowledge effectively. Come and see it in action Hahndorf Primary School and Preschool

Your students can absorb fundamental science skills with our mini lessons! This series includes ten-minute lessons to help years 3-8 understand key topics such as volume, astronomy, classification, states of matter and much more. You can even use these curriculum-aligned videos as inspiration for your own lessons!

EXPLORE HERE: https://ab.co/4ciHld5

Come along……
04/04/2026

Come along……

We are excited to announce the 2026 SAPPA Conference registrations are now open. We look forward to welcoming leaders from public primary schools to collaborate, network and learn. Click the link to register. https://sappa.com.au/overview/

I know how hard it is - believe me. But I still encourage you to try.
04/04/2026

I know how hard it is - believe me. But I still encourage you to try.

When Should Kids Get a Smartphone? The Research, the Risks, & a Better Way Forward

Many parents find themselves facing a familiar dilemma: “Is it time to give my child a phone?”

The pressure can feel enormous — socially, logistically, and emotionally. Children insist that “everyone has one,” other parents reassure us it’s what happens in Year 7, and we wonder whether refusing is unreasonable or outdated.

But before making the jump; pause. While smartphones are part of modern childhood, the age a child receives one matters — a lot.

The Stats That Make You Shudder

A recent peer-reviewed study in Pediatrics followed more than 10,000 children aged 10–12. They found that:

Earlier acquisition of a smartphone is associated with significantly worse outcomes.

Children who received a smartphone during their 12th year had:
57% higher odds of clinical-level mental health difficulties by age 13
62% higher odds of insufficient sleep
40% higher odds of obesity
31% higher odds of depression

The tween and teen brain — particularly the prefrontal cortex responsible for impulse control, planning, and decision-making — isn’t mature right now. The never-ending whirlwind of apps, games, notifications, and distraction (plus time on social platforms that isn’t technically allowed anymore) can be overwhelming for a brain still under construction.

Research internationally suggests a similar theme: Every year we delay smartphone access tends to reduce risk.

Why Parents Usually Say Yes — And Where It Goes Wrong

Parents give me four reasons for handing over a smartphone to their child:

1. Safety (“What if they need help?”)
Response: Smartphones are not required for safety. A basic ‘dumb phone’, watch-phone, or even a household landline solves the safety problem without handing over social media, messaging apps, games, or endless internet access.

2. Logistics (“I need to coordinate pickups and plans.”)
Children survived without phones for generations. Clear communication ahead of time works better than constant messaging, and it builds resilience and independence.

→ Set a pickup time and place → Teach children how to ask an adult for help

→ Make a simple backup plan (“If I’m late, you start walking…”)

And a dumb phone will do the job if logistics is a challenge. See 1. above.

3. Social Connection (“They’ll be left out without one.”)
Group chats and digital friend circles feel social, but they often increase comparison and competition, exclusion and anxiety, cyberbullying, and sleep disruption. In-person friendships remain richer and more developmentally important.

4. “They Need to Learn Eventually”
Giving a 12-year-old a smartphone to “learn to manage it” is a bit like giving that same 12-year-old a bottle of vodka to “learn to drink responsibly.” Most children aren’t developmentally ready for that level of stimulation and access.

A Framework that Actually Works
The standard in our family is simple: “When you can afford it and pay for it yourself — it’s yours.”

That includes: ✔ the device ✔ the monthly plan ✔ repairs ✔ replacements if lost or broken

This framework works because it:
Delays acquisition naturally
Builds financial responsibility
Shifts entitlement to initiative
Reduces peer pressure
Introduces natural consequences

Most children don’t have $800–$1500 for a device plus monthly fees until somewhere between 15–17 — which aligns with many child psychologists’ recommendations.

“But My Child Already Has a Smartphone…”
If the horse has already bolted — please don’t panic. You haven’t “ruined” anything.

Instead, create clear, developmentally appropriate boundaries:...

Read the full article here: https://happyfamilies.com.au/articles/when-should-kids-get-a-smartphone-the-research-the-risks-a-better-way-forward

01/04/2026

Staff pulling one over the kids!

Address

Hahndorf, SA

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when PrincipalNgari posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The School

Send a message to PrincipalNgari:

Shortcuts

Share