22/08/2026
https://youtu.be/bl6ohRSrHFg?si=V-asybX14l2B-N23
[Verification] Aikido Master Unravels Daito-ryu Aiki-jujutsu! This video is a collaboration with Shirakawa senseiโs channel!Chec...
Broadwater Aikido is affiliated with Aikikai Australia. We are a friendly, inclusive club Come along and see what we do .. everyone welcome.
22/08/2026
https://youtu.be/bl6ohRSrHFg?si=V-asybX14l2B-N23
[Verification] Aikido Master Unravels Daito-ryu Aiki-jujutsu! This video is a collaboration with Shirakawa senseiโs channel!Chec...
07/08/2026
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1NUf72KhgQ/
๐๐๐๐ง๐'๐จ ๐๐ฃ ๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ค๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ค๐ช๐ฉ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ค'๐จ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐๐จ๐จ ๐๐ฃ ๐ง๐๐๐ก ๐จ๐๐ฉ๐ช๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐จ. ๐ผ๐จ ๐ ๐ฅ๐ง๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ง ๐ค๐ ๐๐ค๐ฉ๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ข๐จ [๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐๐ค ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฟ๐๐๐ฉ๐ค-๐ง๐ฎ๐ช], ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฉ'๐จ ๐ฎ๐ค๐ช๐ง ๐ฅ๐ค๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ?
๐๐๐ถ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ: Does aikido claim to be effective on the street? If you read O Sensei's writings, or the documents published by the Aikikai, absolutely nothing suggests that. So the case against aikido's effectiveness seems flawed to me. It's up to the minority of aikidoka who claim effectiveness to defend that position, not up to the aikido community to defend it on their behalf.
As for Daito-ryu, it was once considered a highly effective system, but in a very specific context. Takeda Sokaku and Ueshiba Morihei taught, among others, military personnel and law enforcement units. Today, though, the parameters of engagement are quite different, and the formal Daito-ryu curriculum is largely outdated as a system of self-defense or law enforcement. That said, it was already outdated in O Sensei's time.
This is true of all traditional martial arts. From the 16th century onward, bujutsu took on the meaning of "arts of living" rather than pure combat systems. Then came the transformation of bujutsu into budo after the Meiji Restoration. Nobody asks kendo or kyudo practitioners whether they're effective. Honestly, I'm surprised the question still comes up.
In the end, what remains are the fundamental qualities the art develops, physically and mentally, and those remain very valuable in themselves. I place a lot of importance, for instance, on the distinction between satsujinken, the sword that takes life, and katsujinken, the sword that gives life. Aikido has greatly contributed to making my life beautiful and full of joy, and I keep growing through what I learn in it.
Aikido was specifically formulated around a contradiction: the non-violent resolution of conflict. Technically, it means positioning yourself along a line, with very direct, incisive martial principles on one side, and highly elaborate movement and complex use of the body in space on the other. From there, everyone is free to set the balance wherever they want between effectiveness and performance, so in the general Aikido landscape, you really see everything. And that's exactly what I find fascinating. Aikidoka are engaged in a lifelong practice confronting that paradox.
That outsiders find this at least puzzling is understandable, even predictable, and far from undermining aikido's premise, it makes it all the more relevant.
Then there's the fact that we all age. We won't always be able to keep the physical upper hand, so that has to be factored in too, being a bit wiser, sharper, and anticipating things. We talk less about this in terms of effectiveness, but I think it matters a great deal.
That's why reducing everything to what would hypothetically work on the street seems so uninteresting to me, even a little sad.
๐๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฝ๐ช๐จ๐๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ฉ๐๐ก๐ก, ๐ฌ๐ ๐๐๐ฃ'๐ฉ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฉ ๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐ฅ๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ก ๐ ๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐จ๐๐ก๐ซ๐๐จ. ๐๐จ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ค ๐ง๐๐๐ก๐ก๐ฎ ๐ฃ๐ค๐ฉ ๐ข๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข, ๐๐ฃ ๐ฎ๐ค๐ช๐ง ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ?
๐๐๐ถ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ: In an assault situation, none of the conditions for success are in our favor: the element of surprise, the freeze response, no rules, no referee, no warm-up, an opponent who may be armed or in an altered state. Can you ever really prepare for that? For a lot of martial disciplines, not just aikido, I'm not sure the answer is yes.
I don't know your readers' profile, I'd imagine they're mostly physically active men. Are these the people who feel the need to learn self-defense? If so, what about people with disabilities, children, the elderly? Every study shows that they're disproportionately victimized, so the conversation should really be happening elsewhere. The State holds the monopoly on violence, and if security is a major source of concern, then I think we need to be worried about the state of our society. I doubt self-defense is the solution, unless we want to open a debate about carrying weapons. Having spent time in the US, personally, I don't wish for that.
That said, I don't mean aikido isn't meant for the people you're describing, quite the opposite. I've managed reasonably well the few times I've had to use it in the street, but it's not my role to teach people self-defense. Others are far more competent than me at that. My role, in aikido, and maybe as a long-term resident of Japan, is to carry positive values forward, in the hope of contributing to a paradigm shift.
๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ: ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ?
๐๐๐ถ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ: Resolutely, yes. There's not much we can do about hardened criminals, but we can decide together to help reduce, or at least not add to, the ambient violence around us, whether symbolic, verbal, or physical. My experience of life in Japan suggests that's possible. I can look to protect myself, to develop the capacity to fight back, or I can think about how I act and react. Am I listening, or am I pouring fuel on the fire? Can I behave in a way that doesn't add extra friction to an interaction that's already going badly? That's where I find aikido truly relevant, not as technique, but as posture. Kindness and leniency, a sense of the collective, these work on the street.
As a teacher and as a biologist, I worry less about a hypothetical street threat than about the very real existential threat tied to dwindling natural resources, climate change, and the rise of extremism. I dare to believe that today's social, environmental, and political problems could benefit from an approach like aikido's: a cooperative process of self-improvement without recourse to competition. The physical world is finite, of course, so tensions inevitably exist between those who have more and those who have less, but within a social construct, nothing stops us from moving from a zero-sum game to a context where everyone ends up winning. That challenges an entire conception of happiness and success built on competition and the accumulation of wealth, but that cultural shift, in my view, is exactly what will determine whether our species survives or not.
This isn't some whim of mine, I'm not going off on a tangent, O Sensei insisted heavily on this. It's not naive either, it's a deliberate choice about what we want to bring into the world. I often quote Albert Jacquard, a fellow geneticist, because what he says reminds me of Ueshiba's own words. He argued that in a competitive society, every winner creates losers, and that we need to build a human society free of competition, where strength comes not from besting others but from growing stronger through them. There's nothing more natural than competition, it's in our genes, so moving past it is precisely what progress means, especially for a social species.
Source:
https://karatebushido.com/magazines/karate-bushido-n-458/
18/07/2026
12/07/2026
19/05/2026
Here are some photos from our TTC with Marie Petery Shihan. A huge thank you to everyone for a fantastic seminar!
17/05/2026
Thank you Marie Petery Shihan for a fantastic weekend TTC Seminar. So much fun ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ
11/05/2026
| Monday | 7pm - 8:30pm |
| Thursday | 7pm - 8:30pm |
| Saturday | 8am - 10am |