04/09/2026
All week we've been looking at books and literacy in maths. Today, we’re focusing on word problems, in which the mathematics arrives wrapped in text.
Firstly, let’s name a behaviour we think every teacher will recognise. A student meets a word problem, goes straight to the numbers, and starts calculating - usually with whatever operation the class has been practising that week.
Yesterday we asked a question: when a student gives a wrong answer, does it reflect a gap in their mathematics or in their language? There is an Australian tool for telling the difference.
Newman's Error Analysis was developed by Anne Newman in Melbourne in 1977, and it is still being used and researched around the world. It breaks a word problem into five stages: reading, comprehending, transforming, processing and encoding. Working through them with a student shows you where the difficulty lies.
Three places to start:
▪ the NSW Department of Education's summary (open access with a Google account), which explains what the method is and offers slide templates for using the structure with students, including two detailed examples:
🔗 https://app.education.nsw.gov.au/digital-learning-selector/LearningActivity/Card/650
▪ ACER's concept builder, which sets out the five interview prompts and suggests targeted strategies for each type of error:
🔗https://www.acer.org/files/PAT__Concept_Builder-Newmans_error_analysis_FINAL.pdf
▪ If you'd rather watch it in action, AITSL has an illustration of practice showing a teacher working through mathematical word problems with her class and applying Newman's Error Analysis:
🔗 https://www.aitsl.edu.au/resources/working-with-mathematical-word-problems
Knowing where a problem breaks down is the beginning of doing something about it.
Let’s close the book on this week’s theme - maths books and literacy in maths. Thanks for reading along and have a great weekend.