03/07/2025
Opinion: Why Family Day Care Must Not Be Forgotten in the Push for Child Safety Reform
In the wake of recent media coverage and renewed scrutiny around child safety in early education, there’s no question that reform is needed. Our commitment to children’s safety and wellbeing must always come first.
But in the race to “tighten” regulation, we must stop and ask, tighten for whom?
Because much of the conversation we’re hearing right now is being shaped by the lens of Long Day Care large-scale, centre-based services. And while that lens may suit LDC settings, it does not automatically fit Family Day Care (FDC).
And if we continue down this path without nuance or consultation, the consequences could be irreversible.
A Different Model. A Different Reality.
FDC is not a scaled-down version of centre-based care. It is an entirely distinct model, offering small group education and care in a home environment. It's built on relationship-based practice, continuity of care, and deep, individualised knowledge of each child.
Families choose FDC because of these qualities. Children thrive in FDC because of them.
So when we start talking about mandatory CCTV in homes, banning educators from ever working alone, or requiring services to issue and control all educator devices, we risk dismantling the very elements that make FDC work.
These proposals may appear logical on paper, especially when applied to larger settings. But in the context of home-based education, they are logistically, legally, and ethically complex, and in many cases, simply not viable.
What's at Risk
Let’s be clear, none of us in FDC are arguing against child safety. We are professionals. We are mandated reporters. We are deeply committed to the wellbeing of every child in our care.
But if these centre-based proposals are enforced across the board, Family Day Care will not survive in its current form.
And that would be a loss not just for educators and services, but for the thousands of families and children who rely on the unique flexibility, intimacy, and accessibility FDC provides.
Here’s what we should be doing:
Embedding protective behaviours into everyday conversations with children
Strengthening educator training in child safety and trauma-informed practice
Creating clearer reporting protocols tailored to home-based care
Supporting reflective supervision and connection between FDC professionals
Educating families and communities about their role in safeguarding children
These are strategies that respect the FDC model while genuinely strengthening safety.
FDC Deserves a Seat at the Table
FDC is a vital part of Australia’s early learning landscape. It’s especially crucial for families who need flexible hours, smaller environments, or culturally safe care. Its educators are skilled, experienced, and regulated.
We cannot afford to treat this sector as an afterthought.
As reforms move forward, I urge policymakers, peak bodies, and our colleagues across the sector: include Family Day Care in your thinking. Engage us. Listen to us. Recognise our value, not just as a service type, but as a professional community.
Because when we protect the integrity of Family Day Care, we protect another pathway for children to feel safe, seen, and supported.
