06/09/2026
Same question, two completely different answers. Both are true π
π§ TO A 6-YEAR-OLD:
'It's a computer that has seen a LOT of examples. If you showed someone a million cats, they'd get very good at spotting cats. It hasn't been to the park. It's just seen a lot of pictures of parks.'
π§ TO A 16-YEAR-OLD:
'It's a system that predicts the most likely next thing based on patterns in its training data. That means it can be fluent and wrong at the same time β which is why your job is to check it, not trust it.'
The six-year-old version isn't a simplification we'll undo later. It's the same idea, sized correctly.
That's the actual craft in teaching this age range: not dumbing down, but finding the version of the truth that fits.
Which version would land better in your house right now? π