09/08/2018
DARK MATTER
This headline (article's behind a paywall), has more recently become typical of the attempt to validate / confirm dark matter theories. In science reporting, the focus has started shifting away from the search for dark matter, to theories about why we're not finding any. Dark matter is causing some extreme dissonance and frustration in the cosmology field right now.
So here's another of my 'intuited' models of the world. I realise I'm not really qualified to play with this stuff, but given the failure of mainstream physics on this question, this might as well become a free-for-all.
"Dark matter might be harder to detect because it's not from our galaxy"
Nope, dark matter is harder to detect because it's not from our UNIVERSE. When matter "falls out" of our universe, through the event horizon of a black hole, it is spaghettified into elemental precursors, and emerges as a "white hole"/big bang, forming a pocket universe that is apparently not only expanding, but accelerating as it does so.
Dark matter that is detected from within any pocket universe (like ours), is the normal matter that still remains in its parent universe, 'above' the event horizon, as a "halo" surrounding it. So just like we can't see inside galactic black holes, we can't see outside the one we're in.
In fact, the universe is not accelerating / expanding at all. It is WE who are continuing to fall into the singularity, and the edges of our "expanding universe", are actually the static edges of the event horizon that we fell into. It only appears that the universe is expanding relative to us, because we are STILL accelerating / falling / shrinking into a singularity.
A big bang is not an expansion, it is a collapse. And WE are the dark matter of our child universe(s).
Dark matter might be harder to detect because it’s not from our galaxy
Two thirds of the dark matter in the area near the sun was sucked up when the Milky Way devoured another galaxy, and that might make it harder for us to detect
05/08/2018
DARK MATTER
This headline (article's behind a paywall), has more recently become typical of the attempt to validate / confirm dark matter theories. In science reporting, the focus has started shifting away from the search for dark matter, to theories about why we're not finding any. Dark matter is causing some extreme dissonance and frustration in the cosmology field right now.
So here's another of my 'intuited' models of the world. I realise I'm not really qualified to play with this stuff, but given the failure of mainstream physics on this question, this might as well become a free-for-all. Any GLARING reasons why this can't be a valid model?
"Dark matter might be harder to detect because it's not from our galaxy"
Nope, dark matter is harder to detect because it's not from our UNIVERSE. When matter "falls out" of our universe, through the event horizon of a black hole, it is spaghettified into elemental precursors, and emerges as a "white hole"/big bang, forming a pocket universe that is apparently not only expanding, but accelerating as it does so.
Dark matter that is detected from within any pocket universe (like ours), is the normal matter that still remains in its parent universe, 'above' the event horizon, as a "halo" surrounding it. So just like we can't see inside galactic black holes, we can't see outside the one we're in. But we can still feel its gravity.
In fact, the universe is not accelerating / expanding at all. It is WE who are continuing to fall into the singularity, and the edges of our "expanding universe", are actually the static edges of the event horizon that we fell into. It only appears that the universe is expanding relative to us, because we are STILL accelerating / falling / shrinking into a singularity.
A big bang is not an expansion, it is a collapse. And WE are the dark matter of our child universe(s).
Dark matter might be harder to detect because it’s not from our galaxy
Two thirds of the dark matter in the area near the sun was sucked up when the Milky Way devoured another galaxy, and that might make it harder for us to detect
07/06/2018
Yup.
Every Black Hole Contains Another Universe – Equations Predict
Like part of a cosmic Russian doll, our universe may be perfectly nested inside a black hole that is itself part of a larger universe. In turn, all the black holes found so far in our universe—from the microscopic to the supermassive—may be ultimate doorways into alternate realities.
08/11/2017
The slow epiphany...
Dark-Matter Hunt Fails to Find the Elusive Particles
Physicists begin to embrace alternative explanations for the missing material
15/03/2017
Where is all the antimatter? Not here. The matter-to-antimatter flip happens in black holes. So if this universe is a matter universe, then all child universes spawned by it, will be antimatter universes. One type of matter per universe.
20/07/2016
Good background info
Could Dark Matter Not Exist At All?
Dark matter supposedly makes up 80-85% of the Universe's mass, yet we've never directly detected it. What if it doesn't exist at all?
20/07/2016
OR, there is no such thing as dark matter, it is an illusion caused by not yet factoring into our gravity model, all the effects of the expansion *rate* of the universe.