Unwashed Cosmological Axioms for the New Millenium

Unwashed Cosmological Axioms for the New Millenium Things we will discover about the cosmos in the 21st century. Click the 'About' link to see why this

Below is the content of a letter which I sent to the letters page of Scientific American in January 2000. Understandably, it wasn't published, but I'd like to post it publicly here, as I have now seen several articles/studies that seem to support several of my statements. Perhaps more of them will be supported by other work in the future. This page simply serves as a record of these against my pre

dictions, as I find them. As an armchair cosmologist, I hereby absolve myself of the burden of scientific proof for the following claims. I hope that some of these ideas might contain some raw truths that can be taken further by someone. Comments anyone?

- A galaxy is a Julia set

- The Mandelbrot set is a gravity model of the universe

- A black hole is a mathematical ‘lens’ which transforms the shape of space from a Julia set, through the singularity and becoming an exploding/expanding skin (pocket universe) of matter with the surface characteristics of the Mandelbrot set.

- The universe is far from smooth

- Every black hole in a parent universe is the big bang origin of a child universe

- On the collapsing side (parent universe), all time elapsed from expansion to demise is represented on the expanding side (child or pocket universe) by the split-second of the expanding side’s big bang. An observer would perceive an extreme relationship between a parent universe and its child in terms of scale of time (and perhaps quantity of matter too). Ie They may appear equivalent to an observer in each, but 30 billion years may mean a split-second across the lens. Perhaps the entire pocket universe is contained within the space of the black hole singularity, and there is no ‘other side’?

- There is no such thing as dark matter – only normal matter that exists in these pocket universes

- String theory and singularities seem to have graphical analogies in the structures of the Mandelbrot set.

- Old universes don't die, they just fade away. Each pocket universe will continue expanding after its big bang, but the point will be reached where there is no matter left (dissipated through black holes) to enable us (what us?) to identify whether it is expanding, contracting or doing nothing.

DARK MATTERThis headline (article's behind a paywall), has more recently become typical of the attempt to validate / con...
09/08/2018

DARK MATTER

This headline (article's behind a paywall), has more recently become typical of the attempt to validate / confirm dark matter theories. In science reporting, the focus has started shifting away from the search for dark matter, to theories about why we're not finding any. Dark matter is causing some extreme dissonance and frustration in the cosmology field right now.

So here's another of my 'intuited' models of the world. I realise I'm not really qualified to play with this stuff, but given the failure of mainstream physics on this question, this might as well become a free-for-all.

"Dark matter might be harder to detect because it's not from our galaxy"

Nope, dark matter is harder to detect because it's not from our UNIVERSE. When matter "falls out" of our universe, through the event horizon of a black hole, it is spaghettified into elemental precursors, and emerges as a "white hole"/big bang, forming a pocket universe that is apparently not only expanding, but accelerating as it does so.

Dark matter that is detected from within any pocket universe (like ours), is the normal matter that still remains in its parent universe, 'above' the event horizon, as a "halo" surrounding it. So just like we can't see inside galactic black holes, we can't see outside the one we're in.

In fact, the universe is not accelerating / expanding at all. It is WE who are continuing to fall into the singularity, and the edges of our "expanding universe", are actually the static edges of the event horizon that we fell into. It only appears that the universe is expanding relative to us, because we are STILL accelerating / falling / shrinking into a singularity.

A big bang is not an expansion, it is a collapse. And WE are the dark matter of our child universe(s).

Two thirds of the dark matter in the area near the sun was sucked up when the Milky Way devoured another galaxy, and that might make it harder for us to detect

DARK MATTERThis headline (article's behind a paywall), has more recently become typical of the attempt to validate / con...
05/08/2018

DARK MATTER

This headline (article's behind a paywall), has more recently become typical of the attempt to validate / confirm dark matter theories. In science reporting, the focus has started shifting away from the search for dark matter, to theories about why we're not finding any. Dark matter is causing some extreme dissonance and frustration in the cosmology field right now.

So here's another of my 'intuited' models of the world. I realise I'm not really qualified to play with this stuff, but given the failure of mainstream physics on this question, this might as well become a free-for-all. Any GLARING reasons why this can't be a valid model?

"Dark matter might be harder to detect because it's not from our galaxy"

Nope, dark matter is harder to detect because it's not from our UNIVERSE. When matter "falls out" of our universe, through the event horizon of a black hole, it is spaghettified into elemental precursors, and emerges as a "white hole"/big bang, forming a pocket universe that is apparently not only expanding, but accelerating as it does so.

Dark matter that is detected from within any pocket universe (like ours), is the normal matter that still remains in its parent universe, 'above' the event horizon, as a "halo" surrounding it. So just like we can't see inside galactic black holes, we can't see outside the one we're in. But we can still feel its gravity.

In fact, the universe is not accelerating / expanding at all. It is WE who are continuing to fall into the singularity, and the edges of our "expanding universe", are actually the static edges of the event horizon that we fell into. It only appears that the universe is expanding relative to us, because we are STILL accelerating / falling / shrinking into a singularity.

A big bang is not an expansion, it is a collapse. And WE are the dark matter of our child universe(s).

Two thirds of the dark matter in the area near the sun was sucked up when the Milky Way devoured another galaxy, and that might make it harder for us to detect

Yup.
07/06/2018

Yup.

Like part of a cosmic Russian doll, our universe may be perfectly nested inside a black hole that is itself part of a larger universe. In turn, all the black holes found so far in our universe—from the microscopic to the supermassive—may be ultimate doorways into alternate realities.

The slow epiphany...
08/11/2017

The slow epiphany...

Physicists begin to embrace alternative explanations for the missing material

15/03/2017

Where is all the antimatter? Not here. The matter-to-antimatter flip happens in black holes. So if this universe is a matter universe, then all child universes spawned by it, will be antimatter universes. One type of matter per universe.

Good background info
20/07/2016

Good background info

Dark matter supposedly makes up 80-85% of the Universe's mass, yet we've never directly detected it. What if it doesn't exist at all?

20/07/2016

OR, there is no such thing as dark matter, it is an illusion caused by not yet factoring into our gravity model, all the effects of the expansion *rate* of the universe.

Address

Greenside
Johannesburg
2193

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Unwashed Cosmological Axioms for the New Millenium posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share