19/10/2024
I have trained myself in critical thinking and learned to think for myself.
I would like to see this mindset in every teenager I interact with, but telling them they must struggle to gain this independence is self-defeating.
I can't force anyone to be free because that takes away that freedom. So, I can only show them how I do it for myself and serve as a role model.
Consider a martial artist you want to instruct you to become a fighter yourself and think of how absurd it would be if he wanted to have actual combat with you where you have no right to defend yourself.
The master can defend himself, and that’s an ability you must acquire, so being beaten up defeats the purpose of becoming a stronger fighter.
In light of this example of self-defense, let's ponder more about what independent thinking should be and how it is understood by many individuals and groups.
Imagine someone in a long conversation saying: "You need to think for yourself and break free from those institutions that have been brainwashing you. Follow me, and I will show you how to think."
Many manipulators say this, and many victims fall into this trap and start imitating their manipulators in how they defend specific ideas; then, they call anyone with a different view "indoctrinated."
The actual indoctrination is what was done to the victim of this manipulation.
Every time someone instructs a group of people to ditch every source of information except for one source, that's manipulative and insidious, and that is how indoctrination starts.
Parents shouldn't lead their children to a closed-minded lifestyle, but we often see parents who are too restrictive about sources and resources for their children.
Furthermore, some of them have an unbalanced approach, completely blocking one side and not the other.
For example, that could be a parent who lets the doors of mind shaping wide open to movie studios, the music industry, social media networks where people can conceal their real identity, massively multiplayer online games where they pay real money for virtual goods, and TV programs designed to implant wickedness.
The same parent who permits all of those and their combination would prevent the child from being in proximity of intellectuals within their local community, forbid the child from going to the gym or the dojo, having art or cookery class, taking driving lessons when they are in the age to, or joining a speaking club to practice a foreign language they like.
This contradiction between what is allowed and what is not can be falsely justified. If we look at the activities we see that all those that are permitted can be done at home whereas all those that are denied to the child take place outside.
So what happens in the mind of the parent is that their protective instincts perceive those activities in the first category as safe.
That false sense of security comes from the fact that the child is not physically interacted with. But is that the only aspect of the child’s safety that should matter?
Then, the pretext given by this parent would be that the learning that occurs when the child is engaged in those activities of the second category would make the “main and most important source of knowledge” less effective…
No, if your child wants to learn how to draw like their favorite cartoonist, that will not make them a less performant learner.
Also, why should there be a “main and most important source of knowledge” in the first place, and why learning has to be retrained, restricted, limited, formatted, conforming to patterns, following models, advancing on a railway track where there is no second dimension?
Learning about any subject will not harm you in any way as far as you are not taking harmful action, and it will not hinder your learning in general, jeopardize your study plan, or make you less likely to succeed in life.
Only your actions can hurt you or harm the people around you, not the knowledge itself. For example, knowing that hydrochloric acid is corrosive does not hurt you. Doping it on your skin is nocive.
I will not deny that there are books that are harmful in their very nature, so it is legit to avoid them altogether, but those are drops of black ink in oceans of resources.
,
So do not be afraid to learn. Do not fear knowledge.