19/09/2024
❇️❇️❇️ A characteristic of spiritual seekers ❇️❇️❇️
In the interviews I conduct as part of the "Experience of Being" project, I read out to the interviewees statements, which touch on constant, stable and ever-present aspects of experience, and ask for their response to each statement. The interviewees include people with long experience in self-reflection and self-inquiry. Some are on a spiritual path or in a religious tradition, either as seekers/practitioners or as masters/teachers, and some are "just" reflective people.
I noticed a typical response of interviewees, whom I would call (and many of them would probably agree) spiritual seekers or practitioners. When I read out to such interviewees a statement such as "there is something constant, stable and ever-present in my experience," their common response is "I wish it were the case... I have glimpses of that constant, stable and ever-present something in meditation / long retreats" - or a variant of this response.
This response is based on two assumptions: one, that the statement is aimed at a very specific experience, which they had encountered in meditation or retreats or read about. Second, that the goal of their spiritual path is to permanently abide in that experience, which so far they only have glimpses of.
Such an understanding or interpretation of the statement "there is something constant, stable and ever-present in my experience" (for example) is in no way trivial. After all, every person has constant, stable and ever-present aspects of their experience (you can recognize them in your experience). Other interviewees respond, for example, with something like "Give me a moment to reflect and check with myself if this is true of my experience or not..."
So this response of spiritual seekers or practitioners is related to the way they perceive themselves as standing in relation to a certain goal, a desired experiential state, which they have not yet reached. It seems to them that (1) they know what the goal is and (2) that they also know where they stand in relation to it.
To my understanding, both these assumptions are erroneous.