09/10/2025
It is with a heavy heart that the Unanimous Consent (UC) request for ๐ฆ.๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฏ๐ฎ - ๐ ๐ฎ๐ท๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐๐ฐ๐, ๐ญ๐ญ๐ต๐๐ต ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ (๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ-๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฒ), legislation intended to eliminate the so-called "๐ช๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฉ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐
," was rejected on the Senate floor by objection from Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi.
The failure of the request, put forth by Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, means the billโwhich had overwhelming bipartisan support from 76 Senate cosponsors and 304 House cosponsorsโwill not receive immediate consideration and passage, thereby continuing the mandatory benefit offset for over 50,000 combat-injured veterans.
โโโโ
๐๐ฟ๐ด๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ท๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐๐ฐ๐
The debate surrounding the UC request highlighted the central conflict over the principle of double compensation and the mandatory spending cost of the measure.
๐๐ฟ๐ด๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐๐น๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ต๐ฎ๐น (๐-๐๐ง)
Senator Richard Blumenthal, the lead advocate, presented the bill as an issue of fundamental fairness and equity for combat-injured veterans.
โ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ "๐ช๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฉ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐
" ๐ถ๐ ๐จ๐ป๐ท๐๐๐: He argued that the current lawโwhere a veteran's military retirement pay is reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of their VA disability compensationโis one of the "deepest injustices" impacting disabled veterans.
โ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐๐: The offset is unwarranted because the two payments serve entirely different purposes:
โ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ is for the veteran's years of service to the nation.
โ ๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป is for the loss of future earnings due to service-connected injuries or illnesses.
โ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ณ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ: He directly challenged the opposition's cost concern, noting that the $9โ$10 billion estimated cost is a "minuscule fraction" of the $3.4 trillion deficit increase caused by previously passed tax cuts. He contended that the nation can afford to do right by its veterans.
โ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐
๐ถ๐๐๐: Congress has already eliminated this offset for military retirees with 20 or more years of service and a 50% or greater disability rating (CRDP/CRSC). The Star Act seeks to extend this fairness to those medically retired due to combat injuries.
๐๐ฟ๐ด๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ฆ๐ง ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ผ๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ช๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ฟ (๐ฅ-๐ ๐ฆ)
Senator Roger Wicker based his objection primarily on fiscal conservatism and military readiness concerns.
โ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐๐: He stated that the measure constitutes an "entitlement that does amount to a double benefit" and noted the cost of between $9 billion and $10 billion in mandatory spending.
โ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐: Historically, Congress identifies an offset (savings) to cover the cost of new permanent benefits. Since no offset was identified for the Star Act, the mandatory spending would have to come out of the Department of Defense (DoD) budget, negatively impacting military readiness.
โ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐๐ธ ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐: He argued that adding $9โ$10 billion would necessitate cuts from critical areas of national defense, such as pay increases for junior enlisted personnel, munitions, or the modernization of the strategic nuclear system.
โ ๐๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐น๐๐ฐ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ: He pointed out that the legislation has not been accepted even in periods of Democratic control of the Presidency and both chambers of Congress, indicating a bipartisan reluctance to assume the cost without a funding mechanism.
โโโโ
๐ช๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฝ-๐จ๐ฝ:
Despite Senator Blumenthal's impassioned arguments detailing the personal struggles of veterans like Major Richard Star and Master Sergeant Gabriel Peterson, and his offer of a compromise for a guaranteed 60-vote threshold roll call vote before the end of the year, Senator Wicker objected to both requests. The UC request failed due to the singular objection, thus stopping the immediate passage of the Major Richard Star Act.
โโโโ
๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐น๐น๐
The legislative success of previous efforts to ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐๐ for veterans and surviving families often hinged on their ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐บ๐๐๐-๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป to ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐โthe same hurdles facing the Major Richard Star Act.
โ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฃ/๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ (2003โ2004)
โ Used the "must-pass" NDAA vehicle and employed phased-in cost mitigation. The Star Act seeks to finish the work started by CRDP/CRSC.
โ ๐ฆ๐๐ฃ-๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ "๐ช๐ถ๐ฑ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐
" (2019โ2020)
โ Similar to CRDP, it succeeded by attachment to the NDAA and a phased-in approach to address the cost/offset concerns.
โ ๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐ก๐ฆ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ด๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ โ๐๐ ๐๐ก'๐ ๐๐ค๐ ๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐ , ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐ก'๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐โ:
โ ๐ฆ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ ๐ช๐๐ฃ/๐๐ฃ๐ข (2023-2024)
โ "Offset" to Pass the Bill
The term "offset" in legislative contexts typically refers to a budgetary counterbalanceโsuch as spending cuts, revenue increases, or funding reallocationsโrequired under congressional pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) rules to prevent increasing the federal deficit.
For the Social Security Fairness Act, ๐ป๐ผ ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐น.
โ ๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ป๐ผ ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐?
โ The legislation was structured as a repeal of existing benefit reductions, not a new spending program. Its estimated cost (around $196 billion over 10 years, per the Congressional Budget Office) was treated as a mandatory adjustment to Social Security entitlements, exempt from strict PAYGO enforcement in this case. Congress waived or overlooked traditional offset requirements due to the bill's popularity and the political will to deliver relief to affected retirees. Sources like the SSA and congressional records confirm the bill passed without attached offsets, amendments, or riders.
โ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ "๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฑ๐ท๐๐๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐":
โ The closest concept to an "offset found" relates to the bill's retroactive effective date, which created a built-in mechanism for benefit recalculations rather than pure new costs:
ยฐ The repeal applies to benefits payable for months after December 2023 (i.e., starting January 2024).
ยฐ This triggers one-time retroactive lump-sum payments for affected beneficiaries, covering underpayments from JanuaryโDecember 2024 (up to 12 months of back pay).
ยฐ Implementation began in late February 2025, with payments deposited by March 2025 into SSA-on-file bank accounts. Monthly benefits increased starting April 2025.
ยฐ WEP/GPO still apply to pre-2024 benefits, providing a natural "cutoff" that limits total retroactive costs.
๐โ๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ "๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ " ๐๐๐๐ค๐๐๐-๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐, ๐คโ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ .
Despite the setback, the fight for the ๐ ๐ฎ๐ท๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐๐ฐ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ. The bill's extraordinary level of ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐โthree-quarters of the Senate and over two-thirds of the Houseโunderscores the ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ to ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐ท๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ. As Senator Richard Blumenthal affirmed in his closing statement, the effort ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ, relying on the deep and broad support across the aisle to find a ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ, most likely through the powerful legislative vehicle of the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The veterans and their families have ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐๐, and the collective push to have a roll call vote ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐๐ until this ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ด-๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ต๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ is ๐ณ๐๐น๐น๐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฑ.
The ball is back in Congressman Gus Bilirakis and Speaker Mike Johnson 's court. ๐ซกโ๏ธ
๐ซ Senator Roger Wicker ๐ซ Strike 1 (โ๏ธ)
(( ))
