RFI works to secure religious freedom for everyone, everywhere. Unlike any other organization in the field today, the Religious Freedom Institute will:
1.
The Religious Freedom Institute is committed to achieving broad acceptance of religious liberty as a fundamental human right, a source of individual and social flourishing, the cornerstone of a successful society, and a driver of national and international security. It will achieve this goal by convincing stakeholders in select regions that religious freedom can help them achieve their own goals—p
olitical, economic, strategic, and religious. Action Teams will establish a presence in each region to build coalitions and work toward making religious freedom a priority for governments, civil society, religious communities, businesses, and the general public. Advance compelling arguments for religious freedom, drawing on the empirical and theoretical research of Georgetown’s Religious Freedom Research Project.
2. Transform these arguments into action plans that will empower leaders in religion, politics, civil society, the academy, and the media to defend and advance religious freedom. The threat to religious freedom is, at its heart, both spiritual and intellectual. It is manifested in culture, politics, and law. Accordingly, the antidote in any given society must be to engage the skeptics, whether they are religious or secular, civic or political, with powerful and persuasive arguments that go to the root of their objections. A central goal will be to convince those skeptics that religious freedom can help achieve their own goals, that is, that great goods—social, political, economic, and spiritual—flow to all people when the religious freedom of all people is respected in law and culture.
3. Inspire and drive long-term cultural transformation in order to create the conditions necessary to sustain multi-religious, multi-ethnic, pluralistic societies. Outside the West, achieving this ambitious goal will require a systematic effort to discover and nurture those elements in the world’s religions and cultures that can affirm the inherent dignity and freedom of human beings. Inside the West, especially in the United States, cultural and political transformation will actually be a form of cultural reclamation, the rediscovery of a central liberal truth: Religious freedom for all is indispensable for a healthy democracy.
4. Galvanize support for victims of religious persecution—both short-term assistance as well as long-term support—enabling them whenever possible to return to their homelands and to contribute to the construction of societies characterized by pluralism and religious freedom.
5. Catalyze, encourage, and empower groups throughout the world who are already concerned about religious freedom, or those who are open to arguments that religious freedom can serve their own spiritual, intellectual, cultural, and political interests. The RFI will do what is not being done, while at the same time acting as a “force multiplier” for those who are already doing effective work or are capable of doing so.
6. Create a new generation of emerging leaders to be informed defenders of religious freedom by developing high school and university curricula, conducting training sessions, providing internships, funding dissertation fellowships to graduate students working on religious freedom, and providing publishing outlets and networking opportunities for young, untenured faculty across disciplines.
05/08/2026
Writing for Public Discourse, RFI Senior Fellow Paul Marshall distinguishes between the substantive protection of rights, including religious freedom, and the manner in which the different branches of government provide that protection.
In an article last week in Providence, RFI’s Paul Marshall calls Allen Hertzke’s new book, Why Religious Freedom Matters: Human Rights and Human Flourishing “a welcome overview of the vital importance of religious freedom by a veteran writer of informed studies on the subject over the last 30 years.”
RFI joins our colleagues at ADF Legal in celebrating this victory. We were honored to file multiple briefs throughout this case in support of First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, a Christian ministry serving women with unplanned pregnancies.
READ: https://shorturl.at/bnByZ.
05/05/2026
In ReligionUnplugged, RFI’s Paul Marshall reviewed Jan Jekielek’s book:“Killed to Order: China’s Organ Harvesting Industry and the True Nature of America's Biggest Adversary”.
RFI's Nathan Berkeley commented last week in Christian Scholar’s Review on a growing trend among journalists, tech executives, and others who speak about AI in ways that suggest it has genuine human qualities.
“Freedom and Faithfulness: A Catholic Guide to Religious Liberty” was created with the Knights of Columbus to illuminate a Catholic understanding of religious freedom.
RFI’s President Emeritus Tom Farr commented recently in Public Discourse about the relationship between religious freedom and the American founding in honor of the upcoming America 250 celebrations.
In light of the rise in the legalization of assisted su***de, here is a throwback to when RFI’s Nathan Berkeley spoke with the Napa Legal Institute on the issue and how it impacts religious freedom.
The Supreme Court has once again shut down Colorado’s attempts to coerce people into expressing only opinions that it agrees with.
Apparently weary of going after bakers, Colorado enacted a law prohibiting therapists from saying anything that would help clients seeking to become comfortable with their biological s*x or to reduce unwanted same-s*x attraction.
But the law did permit them, to facilitate "identity exploration and development” and to give “assistance to a person undergoing gender transition”
In an 8-1 opinion issued yesterday in Chiles v. Salazar, the Court held that Colorado’s law violated the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech by forcing therapists to express the state’s opinion.
“The First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country,” the Court stated, and “any law that suppresses speech based on viewpoint represents an egregious assault on both of those commitments.”
RFI filed a brief in this case representing Jewish and Muslim therapists, explaining to the Court how Colorado’s law violated the religious liberty of their faiths’ orthodox believers whose clients sought their help.
Judaism and Islam “are built upon long-standing notions of the importance of biological s*x,” our brief argued, and they “require the distinction between male and female to remain clear and constant for the sake of each individual and the community as a whole.”