Conflict Management Institute

Conflict Management Institute Have you ever dreamt of a workplace where drama takes a permanent vacation? We have too. That's why the Conflict Management Institute (CMI) was born.

We're a passionate team of conflict resolution ninjas and mediation experts.

Ask an HR pro what they took away from a training six months ago. Usually you get a shrug and something about "good cont...
08/04/2026

Ask an HR pro what they took away from a training six months ago. Usually you get a shrug and something about "good content."

We ask every CWMS cohort the same open-ended question — what were your key takeaways? Recent answers, unedited:

→ "Don't forget to stress test."
→ "How to refocus and reframe conversations."
→ "Self-determination was huge for me."
→ "Much more clear on the distinction between mediation, investigation, and discipline."
→ "The MOU template and the gravel and gold."

Read those again. None of them are compliments. They're artifacts — a step, a distinction, a document, a phrase somebody can use on Monday.

That's the tell I'd look for in any certification you're considering. Content you sit through produces a feeling. Skills you rehearse produce vocabulary, and vocabulary is what's still there in March.

It's not a complicated mechanism. You practice all seven stages live, under supervision, before you're finished — which is why every participant so far has rated the role-plays either "highly effective" or "transformative." That's not a testimonial. It's the design.

Sept 9–11. Details in the first comment.

"Morgan lied to my face."You can't mediate that sentence.There's no agreement to be reached about who lied. No settlemen...
07/30/2026

"Morgan lied to my face."

You can't mediate that sentence.

There's no agreement to be reached about who lied. No settlement term that resolves it. It's an accusation — backward-looking, judgmental, and structurally unresolvable — and if you try to negotiate it, you will still be there in two hours.

We call it gravel. It's the debris people throw while they're still hurting, and it's what every workplace conflict is buried under when it lands on your desk.

The gold is what's underneath: the need that accusation is protecting. Recognition. Professional dignity. Predictable accessibility. Job security. Those are forward-looking, specific, and — critically — negotiable.

Nobody walks in and states them out loud. You have to go get them.

Two things I'd tell any HR pro who handles these:

→ Most mediations stall in the first twenty minutes because the mediator is still negotiating the accusation.
→ The skill isn't diplomacy. It's sorting — in real time, out loud, with both parties watching, without either one feeling like you just took the other one's side.

Swipe through for four real reframes from our training scenarios. 👇

07/22/2026

Misdiagnose a conflict, and you can spend hours solving the wrong problem.
There's a model mediators use called the Circle of Conflict, and it names five root causes:
Data — a disagreement over facts or information.
Relationship — driven by emotion, history, or a breakdown in communication.
Value — a difference in core beliefs (the hardest to mediate, because beliefs aren't very negotiable).
Structural — caused by power, time, or resources outside either party's control.
Interest — competition over what each side actually needs, not just what they're demanding.
Here's a real one: two neighbors are threatening to sue each other over a tree that drops leaves across the property line. On paper, that's a Data dispute — facts about a property line.
But the tension actually started two years earlier, when one neighbor backed into the other's mailbox and never apologized.
That's not a tree dispute. That's a Relationship conflict wearing a tree's clothing. You could win every argument about property lines and never resolve anything, because the actual wound was never addressed.
Which one of these five do you find hardest to spot before it's too late?

07/20/2026

A few weeks ago I described three signs a dispute isn't really about the money. Here's the framework underneath all three: the Iceberg Model.
Above the waterline sits the Position — what someone says they want. It's rigid, specific, and usually leaves only one winner. "I want $50,000." "I want a public apology." "Tear down the fence."
Below the waterline sit the Interests — the actual needs, fears, and motivations driving that demand. Much harder to see. Much easier to solve.
Here's a simple one: two coworkers who share the closing shift start refusing to work together. One finally tells the owner, "I refuse to ever close with them again — separate us, or I quit."
That's the position. It sounds like a scheduling problem. But dig one layer down, and the real interest might be about feeling unsafe walking to the parking lot alone at night, or resentment over an uneven workload that's never been addressed. Fix the schedule without touching either of those, and the tension just resurfaces somewhere else next month.
Positions clash. Interests, once you actually find them, are almost always workable.
What's the most surprising "interest" you've ever uncovered under someone's rigid demand — at work, in a negotiation, anywhere?

07/17/2026

A lot of people treat the moment everyone finally agrees in mediation as the finish line.
It's not. The finish line is the signature.
Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 154.071, once a settlement is reached and put into a signed, written agreement, it's enforceable exactly like any other contract. Not a moral commitment. Not a good-faith understanding. A contract.
That distinction matters more than people think. A verbal "yes" at 6pm, after eight hours of hard conversation, is worth nothing if it's never signed. I've seen exhausted parties shake hands and go home, only for one side to wake up with second thoughts — and if nothing was signed, there's no MSA to fall back on. You're back to square one.
Once it is signed, the reverse is also true: if one party breaches it later, the other side doesn't have to re-litigate the original dispute. They can simply sue for breach of contract on the MSA itself.
That's exactly why the drafting happens in the room, in real time, while everyone's still present and willing to sign — not as a follow-up email sent two days later when momentum is gone.
Anyone seen an MSA come back to bite someone because of how — or when — it was drafted? I'd love to hear it.
(If you're curious how we actually run this drafting exercise live in the training, I left a link in the comments.)

07/15/2026

Mediators are trained to remain neutral. But neutrality does not require ignoring intimidation, threats, or the possibility of physical harm.

When interpersonal violence surfaces, the mediator must consider more than whether the parties can reach an agreement.

Can each person speak freely?

Is either party afraid of what may happen after the session?

Could information disclosed during mediation increase the risk of retaliation?

Is the threatening person becoming increasingly agitated?

Are separate rooms, virtual participation, security support, or staggered departures necessary?

Can the process be modified safely, or should it stop?

Pausing or terminating a mediation is not taking sides. It may be the most impartial and professionally responsible decision available.

This is one of the ethical decisions we dig into during Safety Planning for Interpersonal Violence During Mediation.

At what point does a difficult mediation become an unsafe mediation?

Let's discuss this on August 13th https://conflictmanagementinstitute.org/products/safety-planning-for-interpersonal-violence

07/14/2026

Insurance mediation rarely presents a perfectly clear ethical answer.

A prior professional relationship. Information disclosed in caucus. A party who may not fully understand the consequences of a proposed agreement. Pressure to move the case toward settlement.

These are the moments when a mediator’s ethical judgment matters most.

Ethical Compass for Insurance Mediators examines the real-world ethical challenges that can arise during insurance disputes, including:

• Conflicts of interest
• Confidentiality and caucus communications
• Impartiality and party self-determination
• Fairness, transparency, and informed decision-making
• Responding professionally when ethical duties compete

Strong mediators do more than understand the rules. They know how to apply them when the situation becomes complicated.

Strengthen the judgment that protects your neutrality, your credibility, and the integrity of the mediation process.

Three signs a dispute isn't actually about the money — even when money is all anyone's talking about.I've watched attorn...
07/07/2026

Three signs a dispute isn't actually about the money — even when money is all anyone's talking about.
I've watched attorneys negotiate a number for hours while the actual obstacle sat untouched under the surface. And I've seen HR professionals inherit a "compensation dispute" that was really about a termination meeting handled badly.
Same iceberg. Different rooms.
The position is what someone says they want. The interest is why they want it. Positions are rigid and mutually exclusive — if you only negotiate positions, someone has to lose. Interests are flexible, and they're almost always compatible once you find them.
That's the entire job: dive below the waterline.
Swipe through for the three tells — and the wrongful termination example on the last slide that shows why a $50,000 demand sometimes gets fully resolved without anyone paying $50,000.
Have you seen this play out — a negotiation that was never really about the number? I'd genuinely love to hear it. 👇

Are you prepared to respond when safety is on the line in mediation?Interpersonal violence (IPV) doesn’t always announce...
06/29/2026

Are you prepared to respond when safety is on the line in mediation?

Interpersonal violence (IPV) doesn’t always announce itself—but when it enters the mediation room, everything changes.

Mediators, attorneys, HR leaders, and conflict professionals carry an ethical responsibility that goes beyond resolution: protecting the physical and emotional safety of everyone involved. Without clear safety planning, high-risk cases can escalate quickly, placing parties—and your practice—at risk.

The webinar “Safety Planning for Interpersonal Violence During Mediation” gives you a practical, step-by-step framework to recognize warning signs, respond appropriately, and implement safety protocols with confidence. This is not theory—it’s real-world readiness for real-world risk.

You’ll learn how to:
• Identify subtle and overt indicators of IPV
• Respond ethically when violence is present
• Apply immediate de-escalation strategies
• Build basic safety plans for vulnerable parties
• Connect individuals to appropriate support services
• Maintain control, neutrality, and safety in high-risk sessions

This training is essential for anyone working in dispute resolution, compliance, HR, or legal environments where unseen risks can surface without warning.

Live Thursday, August 13th, 2026, at 12:00 PM EST / 11:00 AM CST

Take the step from awareness to preparedness.

👉 Register here: Safety Planning for Interpersonal Violence During Mediation https://conflictmanagementinstitute.org/products/safety-planning-for-interpersonal-violence

Insurance disputes don’t fail because of the law—they stall because of communication breakdowns.Join Faith Knight on Wed...
06/29/2026

Insurance disputes don’t fail because of the law—they stall because of communication breakdowns.

Join Faith Knight on Wednesday, August 19th, 2026, at 12 PM EST / 11 AM CST for:

Master Insurance Disputes: A Hands-On Mediator Workshop
A 5-hour immersive, interactive training designed to move you from theory to real-world ex*****on.

This is not a lecture. It’s a working lab for mediators.

Through live role-plays, case simulations, and guided problem-solving, you’ll work through real insurance disputes involving homeowners, auto, and workers’ compensation claims.

What you’ll walk away with:
Practical application of insurance concepts in live mediation scenarios
Stronger negotiation strategies under pressure
Peer collaboration and feedback-driven learning
Increased confidence in handling complex, high-stakes disputes

Designed for mediators who want more than information—they want skill mastery in action.

Bring your toughest case scenarios. We’ll work through them together.

👉 Reserve your seat now and strengthen your mediation practice.
https://conflictmanagementinstitute.org/products/master-insurance-disputes-workshop

Address

2510 E 15th Street Ste 118
Tulsa, OK
74104

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Conflict Management Institute posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category