Taboo Talk with Ray and Steve

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EWVH6Hpcd/

The Ray Amanat Show- Episode 43 (Showcasing Florida Businesses from our USBH Networking group) Join all my business networking friends at USBH Networking, If you ...

It is easy to be a socialist in a free country. It is easy to romanticize communism from the safety of a nation that protects your speech, your property, your movement, your business, your faith, and your right to criticize the government.

But try being free in a socialist or communist country.

Try criticizing the ruling party. Try mocking the ideology. Try challenging the state. Try keeping what you earn, saying what you believe, raising your children without government interference, or posting the wrong opinion online.

Suddenly all that talk about “compassion,” “equality,” and “the people” disappears.

What replaces it is control.

That is the whole point. Socialism always sells itself as kindness. It promises fairness, security, free stuff, and a better life. Then the bill comes due, and the price is liberty. The government that promises to give you everything eventually decides it owns everything, including your voice.

You do not even have to look only at the old communist regimes to see the warning signs. Look at the UK right now.

Freedom House reported that more than 12,000 people were arrested in 2023 under communications laws, including for social media posts, and the UK government itself has acknowledged concerns over police investigating and making arrests after allegations of offensive behavior online.

That should chill every American who still understands the First Amendment.

The freedom to be wrong, rude, offensive, unpopular, sarcastic, religious, political, or politically incorrect is not a loophole. It is the point.

Socialists enjoy freedom in America while defending ideas that would destroy freedom wherever they take power.
Follow-up, never let anyone sell you government control as compassion.

Question, if socialism is so wonderful, why do socialist systems always have to silence the people who disagree?