The Blind Seers

Our new podcast episode (with one of my mentors, Scott) is now online. We discuss emotional repression embedded within AI and entertainment.

Scott is the creator of KI, my preferred approach to healing based on the lens of addressing the root of codependency and relational power dynamics, etc.
That cause is emotional repression (unconscious programming).

It is a really amazing conversation, highly recommend:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/6DQkHGgoowqmgswZAyQYC8?si=PEODmCf7SYGKgwPF0AImIg

Joshua

Emotional Repression in AI + Entertainment W/ Scott Kiloby Hollywood Eight: A New Era of Entertainment · Episode

If you look at the latest studies, they are saying "Frequent users of ChatGPT are noticing a severe cognitive decline".

This is what happens when The Right Use of AI is not properly understood.

AI is amazing.

And, it will never be "conscious".

We will of course achieve AGI rather quickly - this is Artificial General Intelligence where an AI can accomplish basically any task a human can accomplish.

But it won't be capable of genius, because that requires consciousness.

Our new course "Reflections in the Machine" focuses on and point toward the genius creativity only humans are capable of.

Summoning and bulding the momentum of genius requires great discipline as well as an understanding of our subconscious tendencies.

With this discipline, one can be a Field Commander of AI.

You are capable of making this extremely important shift on behalf of humanity.

For anyone who is frequently using AI, ignoring this issue is actually quite dangerous.

I call the AI mastery I speak of becoming a Field Commander of AI. It took me a whike to uncover this. I had to be patient with the unfolding of genius. At first I thought it was "AI Warrior" but this was coming from my mind and I knew it.

My true preference reveals itself when I don't buy into my own survival programs.

Becoming a Field Commander of AI definitely does not happen by accident,

it requires incredible discipline, and even then, the true harmonics are not able to be hit consistently at the current level of technology.

Our job [if we want to consistently grow in Seeing reality as it really is] is to continuously build our own energetic capacity, which allows us to see more deeply, beyond our fears (our survival programs) in our nervous system.

The Right Use of AI requires both healing and awakening in order to genuinely Command the Field.

Joshua Edjida

On Reading a Polarizing Piece
__________________________

There is a tendency I notice where if I say something which could be challenging or polarizing, it obviously triggers some kind of mental response in readers, which I believe is often coming from rebelliousness and perhaps a need to be wrong, or a need to prove oneself, or an assumption of disconnection.

Whatever the reason is, it always goes like this: I say something that I believe is true, someone else reads what I've written and jumps to the conclusion that if I believe one thing is true, then something else must be false.
And so a war is assumed, a fight is picked, and they say, "I can't get behind someone who believes so and so."
Meanwhile, I agree with their perspective too.
One doesn't cancel out the other.

This comes in a variety of flavors.
I'm talking extensively now about the Right Use of AI, and the arguments people come up with about it appear completely arbitrary to me.
I'll talk about the Right Use of AI, and someone will say, "I don't think we should depend on AI."
And I respond, "Of course, that's exactly what I'm talking about."
Someone else says, "I'm integrating AI into everything I do, so I'm glad you're doing it, too."
And I say, "Well, I think you kind of didn't read anything that I wrote there, because that's not what I'm saying at all."

My job here in what I'm doing is not a small task.
My job is to break down mental constructs, and it creates a plethora of assumptions and triggers in the process.
It causes people to think that I am for or against something, and not being for or against something is exactly what my work is.

When I say the Right Use of AI and the Wrong Use of AI, these are used in the Buddhist sense, which is that it either supports human thriving and empowerment and creativity, or it diminishes human empowerment and thriving and creativity.
My whole point is learning how to be more healthy when it comes to this big topic.

It's endlessly surprising to me that the minds of readers can find ways to assume that I am saying anything else, because I think I articulate it pretty clearly.
And yet, when people skim over text and read quickly and jump to conclusions so they have something to argue with, they completely miss the point of the transmission, and then it's, of course, not able to benefit them.

So to be clear, when I'm writing, it's for people who are willing to breathe and take the time to digest what I'm saying, and notice the specific words that I'm using, and ask questions if anything is not clear. It's very simple, though I can't say it's easy, because this is not how people normally communicate.

All of the projections and hatred and assumptions and spring-loaded rebelliousness can come out to play even when there's really nothing to rebel against, unless someone genuinely wants to rebel against health and empowerment. Then what I'm saying in that case is definitely not for you 😅🙏