04/14/2025
HB2827 Update - Saturday, 4/12/2025 Speaking with my Illinois Homeschool Association (ILHSA) hat on....
First off, as I said Tuesday night, I AM SO STINKIN' PROUD OF YOU!!! You folks have totally rocked Springfield with the witness slips and showing up at the capitol to advocate for your freedoms! Well done everyone!
Tuesday's second 'gut and replace' amendment of HB2827 has taken out a few worrisome sections but has a few even worse areas.
1) The most terrifying in my opinion: page 40, line 20 says that if there is a truancy complaint the truant officer "SHALL meet with the child or children complained of and make an initial determination of whether there is cause to start a truancy investigation."
This does not indicate if a parent can be in the room or not. This does not mention if the truant officer will need to interview the parent at all.
If a child is shy, on the spectrum, dealing with severe anxiety, has echolalia, etc. the child will appear afraid and this will trigger a call to DCFS. Anyone who has ever done any work with abused children knowns that abused children do not talk to strangers about their abuser. They tell strangers everything is great because they know they will be abused further the minute the stranger leaves if they tell the truth.
The bill's sponsor says this was to allow the most flexibility possible, but this vague language once again sets up an incredibly uneven application between truant officers of one area vs truant officers in another area. The bill's sponsor is clearly trying to help abused children, but this is not the way.
2) It allows the state to ask what curriculum we will be using on the annual registration form. This is a gateway question. It opens the gate to more rules and control over homeschools.
Does this mean they will soon approve or not approve your curriculum? What happens if you change curriculum? What happens if you use unit studies? What happens if you are deschooling?
3) New homeschoolers leaving the public school would have only 3 days to fill out the form!
4) This bill removes us as private schools in 2 ways:
a) It would literally change the language of section 26.1 of the Illinois School Code that relates to non-public schools. We legally homeschool under this law. In the sponsor's current version of the bill she rewrites it (see page 33 lines 7-12) by saying: "Any child attending a private school, a parochial school, or a homeschool where children are taught the branches of education taught to children of corresponding age and grade in the public schools." Right now we ARE private schools. This separates us out away from other private schools and makes us far easier political targets for further defining of who we are and what we do.
b) Page 3 line 18 begins a definition of Homeschool that has many worried. Note the "for the sole purpose":
"Homeschool" means a program where instruction is provided
19 in a student's home environment and which may have more than
20 one student so long as all students in the homeschool are
21 members of the same household, except that students in
22 homeschool are deemed private school children for the sole
23 purpose of providing equitable services using proportionate
24 share funds under the federal Individuals with Disabilities
25 Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400.
Removing us as private schools with all of the rights, privileges and responsibilities of every other private school could have far reaching consequences. For instance, as private schools in Illinois under the Levison decision we have the right to graduate our students out of our own private (home) schools. It would be very easy for another bill to come along and strip us of that right if this language passed into law.
To be clear, this bill is opening the gate to striping us of our private school status.
There are a lot more possible horrors in here too. The bill has a mix of old and new language instructing us to both submit registration forms to the local public school (old language) and directly to the ROE (new language). The bill defines the homeschool as the student's home environment but says to provide the address of the place at which the student is physically present while receiving the majority of instruction (pg 4, lines 24-26). So grandma's address would need to be on the form if the kids are with grandma 3 days a week - but not their home address?
The one good thing is it is a bit more transparent. At least this time they can't deny the truant officer is doing the investigating. This time too it makes it very clear everyone found suspicious will go directly to court.
Remember: the whole purpose of this bill is to save children from abuse and neglect under the guise of "homeschooling". Yet, "homeschooled students are 40% LESS likely to die by child abuse or neglect than other students nationally" (Williams, Roger. (2017, July 28). Homeschool Child Fatalities Fewer than National Average) has apparently not been heard or believed (?) by those seeking oversight.
The fact that the public school system is clearly failing many of our students < https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/State.aspx... > and many families have chosen non-public school options out of desperation in an effort to meet their student's needs also seems to not matter.
Please continue to urge our legislators to put this money and energy into supporting - or revamping entirely - our failing DCFS system. Urge them to help the thousands of children and families already identified and in desperate trouble. Urge them to save lives by building up existing infrastructure instead of trying to create new rules to regulate those of us already acting in the best interests of our children.
Urge our legislators to realize this is a solution in search of a problem.
www.ilhsa.org
HB2827 Update - Friday 3/21/2025 The Ad Hoc Committee consensus today (remember, this includes ILHSA, RCHEN, and ICHE) is that we ONLY call our elected representatives at this time. Don't call everyone else's right now - it is still a bit early for that. We have heard of numerous Representatives