Rise of the Moors

10/15/2025

Follow our Instagram

06/14/2024

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abFtG7sHIdE

Saudi Arabia has officially ended its 50-year petrodollar agreement with the United States, shifting to a multicurrency system for oil sales. This transition...

06/04/2024

It is well settled that at common law a person may change his name at will, without resort to legal proceedings, by merely adopting another name, provided that this is done for an honest purpose. William Gilligan Co. v. Casey, 205 Mass. 26, 31. Lord v. Cummings, 303 Mass. 457, 458. In re Ross, 8 Cal. (2d) 608. Loser v. Plainfield Savings Bank, 149 Iowa, 672. Smith v. United States Casualty Co. 197 N. Y. 420. Huff v. State Election Board, 168 Okla. 277. State v. Ford, 89 Ore. 121. Laflin & Rand Co. v. Steytler, 146 Penn. St. 434. Brayton v. Beall, 73 S. C. 308. Doe v. Yates, 5 B. & Ald. 544, 556. 38 Am. Jur., Name, Section 28. In jurisdictions where this subject has been regulated by statute, it has generally been held that such legislation is merely in aid of the common law and does not abrogate it. In re Ross, 8 Cal. (2d) 608, 609. Reinken v. Reinken, 351 Ill. 409, 413. Smith v. United States Casualty Co. 197 N. Y. 420, 429. Laflin & Rand Co. v. Steytler, 146 Penn. St. 434, 442. Brayton v. Beall, 73 S. C. 308, 311.

05/27/2024

48 U.S. 1 (1849), Luther v. Borden. That the General Assembly of said Colony, from time to time, elected and appointed delegates to the General Congress of the delegates of the several Colonies of North America, held in the years 1774, 1775, and 1776, and to the Congress of the United States of America, in the years 1776 and 1778. And that said delegates of said Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations were received by, and acted with, the delegates from the other Colonies and States of America, in Congress assembled, as the delegates representing the said Colony and State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations; and that on the 4th day of July, A. D. 1776, said delegates of the said Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations united with the delegates of the other Colonies as representatives of the United States of America, and as such assented to and signed in behalf of said Colony the Declaration of the Independence of the United States of America.

05/27/2024

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1967-pt12/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1967-pt12-2-1.pdf THE 14TH AMENDMENT Is UNCONSTITUTIONAL The purported 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution is and should be held to be ineffective, invalid, null, void and unconstitutional for the following reasons: 1. The Joint Resolution proposing said Amendment was not submitted to or adopted by a Constitutional Congress. Article I, Section 3, and Article V of the U.S. Constitution. 2. The Joint Resolution was not submitted to the President for his approval. Article I, Section 7. 3. The proposed 14th Amendment was rejected by more than one-fourth of all the States then in the Union, and it was never ratified by three-fourths of all the States in the Union. Article V. I. THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONGRESS The U.S. Constitution provides: Article I, Section 3. "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State • • *" Article V provides: "No State, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate." The fact that 23 Senators had been unlawfully excluded from the U.S. Senate, in order to secure a two-thirds vote for adoption of the Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment is shown by Resolutions of pro- test adopted by the following State Legislatures: The New Jersey Legislature by Resolution of March 27, 1868, protested as follows: "The said proposed amendment not having yet received the assent of the three-fourths of the states, which is necessary to make it valid, the natural and constitutional right of this state to withdraw its assent is undeniable • • • ."… The Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment 9 was never presented to the President of the United States for his approval, as President Andrew Johnson stated in his message on June 22, 1866.10 Therefore, the Joint Resolution did not take effect. DI. PROPOSED AMENDMENT NEVER RATIFIED BY THREE-FOURTHS OF THE STATES 1. Pretermitting the ineffectiveness of said resolution, as above, ftfteen (15) States out of the then thirty-seven (37) States of the Union rejected the proposed 14th Amend-ment between the date of its submission to the States by the Secretary of State on June 16, 1866 and March 24, 1868, thereby further nullifying said resolution and making it impossible for its ratification by the constitutionally required three-fourths of such States, as shown by the rejections thereof by the Legislatures of the following states: Texas rejected the 14th Amendment on October 27, 1866. Georgia rejected the 14th Amendment on November 9, 1866. Florida rejected the 14th Amendment on December 6, 1866. Alabama rejected the 14th Amendment on December 7, 1866. North Carolina rejected the 14th Amendment on December 14, 1866. Arkansas rejected the 14th Amendment on December 17, l866. South Carolina rejected the 14th Amendment on December 20, 1866. Kentucky rejected the 14th Amendment on January 8, 1867. Virginia rejected the 14th Amendment on January 9, 1867. Louisiana rejected the 14th Amendment on February 6, 1867. Delaware rejected the 14th Amendment on February 7, 1867. Maryland rejected the 14th Amendment on March 23, 1867. Mississippi rejected the 14th Amendment on January 31, 1867. Ohio rejected the 14th Amendment on January 15, 1868. New Jersey rejected the 14th Amendment on March 24, 1868. There was no question that all of the Southern states which rejected the 14th Amendment had legally constituted governments, were fully recognized by the federal government, and were functioning as member states of the Union at the time of their rejection.

05/21/2024

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008): “Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting [one] to repel force by force when the intervention of society in his behalf may be too late to prevent injury.”

05/21/2024

In the federal court case Miller v. Bonta Case No.: 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB). Decided June 4th, 2021, one month before our arrest. The Judge made it clear that AR-15 style rifles and their standard 30 round magazines, which this state erroneously refers to as large capacity, are protected by the second amendment as they and their 30 rounds magazines are standard and owned by millions of Americans for lawful purposes. The court makes reference to retired Arm General Youngman’s testimony, on how this type of rifle with its 30 round magazines are ideal for militia use, effectiveness and rediness. In the federal judges decision, a paragraph titled Militia use, I quote the court on the following: The concept of the citizens’ militia, as protected by the Second Amendment, is an informal assembly of able-bodied, ordinary citizens acting in concert for the security of our nation. Heller , 554 U.S., at 600, 128 S.Ct. 2783 ("citizens’ militia" is a safeguard against tyranny). "[T]he Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense." Heller , 554 U.S., at 595, 128 S.Ct. 2783. There are at least two reasons why the militia is thought to be necessary to the security of a free country. First, it is useful in repelling invasions. Second, "when the able-bodied men of a nation are trained in arms and organized, they are better able to resist tyranny." Heller , 554 U.S., at 597–98, 128 S.Ct. 2783. For service in the citizens’ militia, one is expected to bring for action a commonly used firearm such as a gun used for self-defense at home or for hunting game. "With this explanation we can see the diction between, as an example, service in the organized and unorganized militias. If you were to join an organized state militia, they would provide you with a government issued service rifle, not owned by you, but assigned to you only for your term of service and must be returned upon discharge. Yet, in a private militia, you are required to furnish your own. The court continued: In this case, the evidence overwhelmingly shows that AR-15 platform rifles are ideal for use in both the citizens’ militia and a state-organized militia. Quite apart from its practicality as a peacekeeping arm for home-defense, a modern rifle can also be useful for war. In fact, it is an ideal firearm for militia service. Major General D. Allen Youngman, U.S. Army (retired) testified credibly about the usefulness for militia service of rifles built on the AR-15 platform… Youngman's testimony is uncontroverted. Youngman is very well qualified to opine on the usefulness of an AR-15 for militia use. He has served in the regular army and the army reserves. He served as Kentucky's Adjutant General commanding the state's national guard. He is a fi****ms trainer and armorer. He was a member of the bar and worked as a prosecutor. His opinion that an AR-15 is an ideal firearm for use in a militia is unequivocal and uncontested… Citizen Militias are not Irrelevant - Before the Court there is convincing and unrebutted testimony that the versatile AR-15 type of modern rifle is the perfect firearm for a citizen to bring for militia service. In the courts reference to AR-15’s it explains that it includes its standard 30 round magazines and that they too are protected by the second amendment. And I quote the court: "The fact that a statistically significant number of Americans use AR-type rifles and large-size magazines demonstrates ipso facto that they are used for lawful purposes.” This clearly indicates that we fall within the operative clause of “lawful purpose” of statutory exemptions of Mass General Law 140 § 129 c(m): The provisions of this section shall not apply to the following exempted persons and uses: (m) The temporary holding, handling or firing of a firearm… where such holding, handling or firing is for a lawful purpose.

05/21/2024

“More Popular than the Ford F-150 Pickup Truck Modern rifles are popular. Modern rifles are legal to build, buy, and own under federal law and the laws of 45 states. There are probably more modern rifles in circulation than there are Ford F-150 pickup trucks…. “[W]e note that in 2012, the number of AR- and AK-style weapons . . . was more than double the number of Ford F–150 trucks sold, the most commonly sold vehicle in the United States.” Kolbe v. Hogan, 813 F.3d 160, 174 (4th Cir. 2016), on reh’g en banc, 849 F.3d 114 (4th Cir. 2017)…. : is a modern rifle commonly owned by law-abiding citizens for a lawful purpose? For the AR-15 type rifle the answer is “yes.” ROGER T. BENITEZ, United States District Judge 2021-06-04

05/20/2024

ETYMOLOGY OF THE WORD MOABITA
La palabra moabita procede del latín bíblico Moabītes, la cual a su vez procede del hebreo mō'ābī.
…
La primera definición de moabita en el diccionario de la real academia de la lengua española es natural de Moab. Otro significado de moabita en el diccionario es perteneciente o relativo a esta región de la Arabia Pétrea, al oriente del mar Mu**to. Moabita es también almorávide. Era.
https://educalingo.com/en/dic-es/moabita

57. The Almoravides are referred to as "Moabitas" in the Latin text of the chronicle. They were a fanatical Moslem dynasty of North African origin which existed from 1055 to 1147. Their initial incursions on the Peninsula were at the request of the faltering kings of the Taifus who sought their military assistance against the increasingly hostile policies of Alfonso VI. Their rapid expansion resulted from a radical religious spirit and a strict military discipline. The rise of the Almohades precipitated the end of the Almoravides. José Antonio Conde, Historia de la dominación de los árabes en España (Paris: Baudry, 1840), pp. 349-463. https://libro.uca.edu/lipskey/chronicle.htm

05/19/2024

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ci0Gy-tGpRI

Link for literature - https://royaltjewelers.shop/collections/literature

05/15/2024

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neUTQbHiUm4

► Subscribe to Transatlantic Productions 💥Smash The LIKE Button👍🏿 Share↗️ & hit the Notifications Bell 🔔► Donate so we can complete the u...

05/14/2024

https://youtu.be/Ygi7KuSazn4

Dr. Roy Casagranda explores the career of one of the greatest warriors in history. Khalid ibn al-Walid is essentially unknown outside of the Muslim world des...