GOD ONLY

THE REASON WHY THERE IS NO HISTORICAL RECORD OF JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH

Excerpts from:
The Dead Sea Scrolls and The Life Of The Original Christians: The Ancient Essenes, by Raymond W. Bernard, PH.D ©️ 1956

"The only Christians were the Essenes. They were known as Christosites, or followers of Christna (Krisna of India), prophet of ancient India, who lived 3000 B.C. Apollonius of Tyana, leader of the Essenes, had carried the gospel of Christna from India, translating it from the Sanscript to Aramic [Aramaic], after which he introduced it to them. It was known as the "Diegesis", or the Original Gospel, from which, three centuries later, at the Council of Nicea, in the year 325 A.D., the present four Christian Gospels, after considerable changes, omissions and interpolations, were derived. ***The events depicted in these [Christian] Gospels really referred to the life of the immaculately conceived and crucified Christna ***which were shifted ahead 3,000 years and enacted in Palestine in the figure of a newly created Judean savior, who was a combination of Jehoshua Ben Pandira, the Essene leader of 100 B.C., and Yeshai Beth Halachmee, the young Essene who was put on a cross and taken down unconscious during the first century, whose life and crucifixion are described in the scrolls discovered in 1882 by Russian physician , Dr. De Waltoff, in a cave at safed in Palestine."

"This gospel was known as the Diegesis, or the Original Gospel, from which the four Christian gospels were later derived (three centuries later by Roman priests [under Constatine] who met at the council of Nicea in 325 A.D.). The central figure of this Original Gospel was Christna of India (Krishna) Teacher of Righteousness of Universal Compassion, both to men and animals. In order to disguise the Hindu origin of the new religion which they borrowed from the Essenes, the [Catholic church] purposely identified Krishna (Christna of India) with a previously unknown and insignificant Jewish youth who lived in Palestine during the early part of the first century A.D., whose name was Yeshai Beth Halachmee, or Jesus. By combining [Jehoshua Ben Pandira,] Yeshai Beth Halachmee and Christna in the form of Jesus Christ, they made a strategic move that won over [defeated/conquered] the previously despised and persecuted religion of the Essenes, subsequently known as Christianity, to Constantine, emperor of Rome, who accepted it as the imperial religion of the Roman Emperor, whereupon he turned his legions from persecuting the Christians to persecuting those who refused to accept Christianity in its new Romanized [Jesus Christ of Galilee] form."

"That the Essenes or early Christians were followers of an ancient Teacher of Righteous, who had lived many centuries [3,000 years] before the dawn of the Christian era, of whom the Essene youth Yeshai Beth Halachmee, or Jesus, was also a follower, is clearly shown by the archeologist, Eisler, in his monumental work, "Orpheus the Fisher". Here he shows that the early Christians themselves were ignorant of the existence of any such man as Jesus Christ, whose name the Dead Sea Scrolls never mentions, nor did they worship him. In his studies on early Christian archeology, Eisler found that no representations of Jesus could be found among the catacomb inscriptions, nor of the cross or the crucifixion. Those who wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls had no knowledge of any resurrection as having ever occurred."

What do we have to say about this?

The entire world worships a man that never existed on his own two feet. Jesus is the invention and product of IDENTITY THEFT.

This aforementioned book is only 34 pages long. Order it and READ IT. Don't debate with us. Purchase and read the book. The Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 1947. This book was written 9 years later.

(1) The Dead Sea Scrolls DO NOT, NOT, NOT mention "Jesus Christ" at all. That is a historical fact. The Catholic church added the name "Jesus." So, it doesn't matter if Christians call him Jesus or Messianic Israelites call him Yeshua, Yahushua, Yahawashi, Ashyah or any other name. THE MAN NEVER EXISTED. The entire life of Jesus is the identity theft of two REAL LIFE men: Yeshai Beth Halachmee and Christna of India (Krishna) and one fictional man, named Jehoshua Ben Pandira. It doesn't matter what anyone calls him. The dead sea scrolls only call him a Righteous Teacher. The name of Jesus is NOT IN THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS.

(2) The entire story, the life details, the life experiences, the miracles, the teachings, everything about Jesus is STOLEN from the lives of two real life dudes and one make believe dude. Identity THEFT. This book claims that the story of Jesus is based on the life of Christna of India (Krishna), Jehoshua Ben Pandira, and Yeshai Beth Halachmee... that the entire story of Jesus is STOLEN, STOLEN, STOLEN from the life experiences of THREE MEN. YES, YES, YES. That the Roman ruler, Constantine, and all the Catholic church leaders at the Council of Nicea, combined the details of those three men, to create the character, JESUS. Which is why the history of Jesus is shrouded in so much mystery, and so convoluted. Because his life is the identity theft of two REAL LIFE men and one fictional man, used to create a whole new, FICTIONAL MAN, that the entire world now worships and swears is real.

And this is why there is NO. HISTORICAL. RECORD. OF. JESUS. Jesus never existed.

"The anointing destroys the yoke" is one of the most popular quotes in churchianity. And it's one of the worst mistranslations in the entire bible, BAR NONE.

What is the original Hebrew word in this verse, for "the anointing"? The original Hebrew word is: "shemen"

Bible > Strong's > Hebrew > 8081
◄ 8081. shemen ►
Strong's Concordance
shemen: fat, oil
Original Word: שֶׁמֶן
Part of Speech: Noun Masculine
Transliteration: shemen
Phonetic Spelling: (sheh'-men)
Definition: fat, oil
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from shamen
Definition
fat, oil
NASB Translation
choice (1), fatness (2), fertile (2), fertile* (1), lavish (1), oil (176), oils (3), ointment (1), olive (6), wild* (1).

And it means FAT. It does NOT mean "anointing" as the krishtian translators translated to be. Here are some examples:

New International Version (Isaiah 10:27)
In that day their burden will be lifted from your shoulders, their yoke from your neck; the yoke will be broken because you have grown so fat.

English Standard Version (Isaiah 10:27)
And in that day his burden will depart from your shoulder, and his yoke from your neck; and the yoke will be broken because of the fat.

Berean Study Bible (Isaiah 10:27)
On that day the burden will be lifted from your shoulders, and the yoke from your neck. The yoke will be broken because your neck will be too large.

New American Standard Bible (Isaiah 10:27)
So it will be on that day, that his burden will be removed from your shoulders, and his yoke from your neck; and the yoke will be broken because of fatness.

Amplified Bible (Isaiah 10:27)
So it will be in that day, that the burden of the Assyrian will be removed from your shoulders and his yoke from your neck. The yoke will be broken because of the fat.

Christian Standard Bible (Isaiah 10:27)
On that day his burden will fall from your shoulders, and his yoke from your neck. The yoke will be broken because your neck will be too large.

Holman Standard Bible (Isaiah 10:27)
On that day his burden will fall from your shoulders, and his yoke from your neck. The yoke will be broken because of fatness.

American Standard Version (Isaiah 10:27)
And it shall come to pass in that day, that his burden shall depart from off thy shoulder, and his yoke from off thy neck, and the yoke shall be destroyed by reason of fatness.

GOD'S WORD® Translation (Isaiah 10:27)
At that time their burden will be removed from your shoulders. Their yoke will be removed from your neck. The yoke will be torn away because you have grown fat.

International Standard Version (Isaiah 10:27)
At that time, his burden will depart from your shoulder and his yoke from your neck. Indeed, the yoke will be broken, because you've become obese.

JPS Tanakh 1917 (Isaiah 10:27)
And it shall come to pass in that day, that His burden shall depart from off thy shoulder, And his yoke from off thy neck, And the yoke shall be destroyed by reason of fatness.

Literal Standard Version (Isaiah 10:27)
And it has come to pass in that day, His burden is turned from off your shoulder, And his yoke from off your neck, And the yoke has been destroyed, because of prosperity.

☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿 In this verse, "FAT" means prosperous, not "anointing."

And this verse is NOT TALKING ABOUT NOW. This verse is talking about a future time that has NOT HAPPENED YET. This verse is NOT talking about a spiritual anointing. It's NOT talking about a freaking tongue-talking Holy Ghost or twitching, flinching, jerking, aisle running, shouting, dancing, Holy Spirit. This verse is NOT talking about the Ru'ach or the anointing of some Holy Ghost. No. Once again, this verse was STOLEN by churchianity and the krishtians that love it. This verse is literally, literally, LITERALLY talking about Israel being so prosperous that the yoke of ASSYRIAN BO***GE LITERALLY BREAKS FROM OFF OUR NECKS. This verse is talking about us coming out from under Assyrian bo***ge, at a future time. Not bo***ge from a "devil" that was cast out of Heaven. NO. Look at the literal translation. The literal translation says - FAT. Not some tongue-talking, spiritual "anointing." and sprinkle it upon Aaron, and upon his garments, and upon his sons, and upon the garments of his sons with him: and he shall be hallowed, and his garments, and his sons, and his sons' garments with him. - Exodus 29:21

And the Hebrew word for "anointing" is: "mishchah"

☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿◄ 4888. mishchah ►
Strong's Concordance
mishchah: anointed
Original Word: מִשְׁחָה
Part of Speech: Noun Feminine
Transliteration: mishchah
Phonetic Spelling: (meesh-khaw')
Definition: consecrated portion

And this is an example of the CORRECT usage of Hebrew word for anointing oil:

Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of The Most High came upon David from that day forward. So Samuel rose up, and went to Ramah. 1 Samuel 16:13

Bible > Strong's > Hebrew > 4886
◄ 4886. mashach ►
Strong's Concordance
mashach: to smear, anoint
Original Word: מָשַׁח
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: mashach
Phonetic Spelling: (maw-shakh')
Definition: to smear, anoint
NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
a prim. root
Definition
to smear, anoint
NASB Translation
anoint (21), anointed (42), anointing (1), oil (1), painting (1), spread (4).

☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿So, why did the bible translators translate the Hebrew word for "FAT" into the English word "anointing?"

Because they translated the bible in a way that supports krishtian doctrines. They want you to think the sorcerer from Galilee is the anointed one and the Holy Ghost is the "anointing." The bible says NONE OF THESE THINGS!

The Holy Ghost is NOT the anointing and the Holy Ghost does NOT DESTROY THE YOKE.

The New Testament Messiah is a JOKE and not to be taken seriously. The "Lamb that was slain" is a liar, a fraud, a counterfeit, a charlatan and a deceiver.

Deuteronomy 4:2 and 12:32 explicitly command: Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you. What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿 Yet, that is precisely what 'the man from Galilee' did - he added to Torah, and he's a lying snake.

(1) 👉🏿 In Matthew 19:9, the so called 'bright and morning star' said, "And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery."

THERE'S TOO MUCH EISEJESUS IN ISRAEL. AND NO, "EISEJESUS" IS NOT A TYPO!

YOU DO NOT NEED THE "PISO FAMILY" ARGUMENT TO DEBUNK THE NEW TESTAMENT. Leaving Jesus, by James Wood, is a FREE BOOK that you can download RIGHT NOW. If you have a Kindle or the Kindle App, click on the link below, to download the book for free. The Piso Family argument is useful, but it's a LAZY argument, because it doesn't require you to study. Download Leaving Jesus, NOW, AND MEMORIZE IT.

https://www.smashwords.com/books/download/98741/4/latest/0/0/leaving-jesus.mobi

“Do not turn to mediums or necromancers; do not seek them out, and so make yourselves unclean by them: I am the LORD your God."
👉🏿 Leviticus 19:31

"There shall not be found among you anyone who burns his son or his daughter as an offering, anyone who practices divination or tells fortunes or interprets omens, or a sorcerer or a charmer or a medium OR A NECROMANCER OR ONE WHO INQUIRES OF THE DEAD, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD. And because of these abominations the LORD your God is driving them out before you."
👉🏿 Deuteronomy 18:10-12

And when they say to you, “Inquire of the mediums and THE NECROMANCERS who chirp and mutter,” should not a people inquire of their God? SHOULD THEY INQUIRE OF THE DEAD ON BEHALF OF THE LIVING?"
👉🏿 Isaiah 8:19

☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿 ISRAELITES ARE PROHIBITED FROM COMMUNICATING WITH THE DEAD.

"And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: and he was transfigured before them. And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them. AND THERE APPEARED UNTO THEM ELIAS (ELIJAH) WITH MOSES: AND THEY WERE TALKING WITH JESUS." 👉🏿 Mark 9:2-4

"And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart, And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light. AND, BEHOLD, THERE APPEARED UNTO THEM MOSES AND ELIAS (ELIJAH) TALKING WITH HIM." 👉🏿 Matthew 17:1-3

Israelites are NOT permitted to communicate with the dead.

"But Elijah was taken up in a whirlwind! Elijah didn't die!"

"But when Herod's birthday was kept, the daughter of Herodias danced before them, and pleased Herod. Whereupon he promised with an oath to give her whatsoever she would ask. And she, being before instructed of her mother, said, Give me here John Baptist's head in a charger. And the king was sorry: nevertheless for the oath's sake, and them which sat with him at meat, he commanded it to be given her. And he sent, and beheaded John in the prison. And his head was brought in a charger, and given to the damsel: and she brought it to her mother. And his disciples came, and took up the body, and buried it, and went and told Jesus. 👉🏿 Matthew 14:6-12

John the Baptist was CEMETERY DEAD, IN HIS GRAVE, WITH HIS HEAD LYING NEXT TO HIS SKELETON. HE WAS, DEAD-DEAD. Yet, according to the New Testament messiah, John the Baptist was Elijah:

For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John. And if ye will receive it, this is Elias (Elijah), which was for to come (Malachi 4:5). 👉🏿 Matthew 11:13,14

And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias (Elijah) must first come (Malachi 4:5)? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias (Elijah) truly shall first come, and restore all things. But I say unto you, That Elias (Elijah) IS COME ALREADY, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them. Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of JOHN THE BAPTIST. Matthew 17:10-13

☝🏿☝🏿☝🏿 And there you have it. Whether Elijah died or was caught up in a whirlwind, according to the New Testament Messiah, JOHN THE BAPTIST was ELIJAH.

The New Testament messiah violated Torah. Leviticus 19:31 and Deuteronomy 18:10-12, prohibits Israelites from communicating with the dead. And in Matthew 17:1-3 and Mark 9:2-4 we have the New Testament messiah communicating with the dead. The New Testament messiah is a necromancer/medium. "He who knew no sin?" The New Testament messiah was a sinner like no other. He violated Torah, point blank, period.

***Not only is the New Testament messiah a medium/necromancer, he's a LIAR too***

And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him (John the Baptist), Who art thou? And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias (Elijah)? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No."
👉🏿 John 1:19-21

While John the Baptist was STILL ALIVE, he did NOT corroborate the New Testament messiah's claim that he was Elijah. He said, "I am not. No." The New Testament messiah is a necromancer AND a LIAR. "He who knew no sin?" Ummmm, he knew plenty.

Deliberate Mistranslation Part 2

Once again, the King James bible was translated by Christians. That being the case, it's easy to see why the Christian translators of the King James bible would be biased in their translation of the Hebrew text - in order to FORCE their New Testament messiah into the Old Testament. And this is exactly what they've done in Isaiah 53:4:

Surely he hath borne our [GRIEFS], and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. Isaiah 53:4

The word in question is the Hebrew word, "choli." And the Christian translators chose the english word, "grief" when the more accurate word is "disease." Yes. The Christian translators deliberately translated the word "choli" as grief instead of the word disease. They did this because if the New Testament messiah is truly God, him being vulnerable to disease would undermine his deity and beg the question: How can a man that's supposedly the Almighty God in the flesh, be vulnerable and subject to disease? And yet, able to cure the diseases of others, but not himself? See the definition of "choli" below:

Bible > Strong's > Hebrew > 2483

◄ 2483. choli ►

Strong's Concordance

choli: sickness

Original Word: חֱלִי
Part of Speech: Noun Masculine
Transliteration: choli
Phonetic Spelling: (khol-ee')
Definition: sickness

NAS Exhaustive Concordance

Word Origin
from chalah
Definition
sickness
NASB Translation
affliction (1), disease (2), grief (1), griefs (1), illness (3), sick (1), sickness (14), sicknesses (1).

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance

disease, grief, is sickness

From chalah; malady, anxiety, calamity -- disease, grief, (is) sick(-ness).

see HEBREW chalah

The Hebrew word "choli" means SICKNESS. See below where the translators CORRECTLY translated "choli" as SICKNESS:

Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses (choli), and of long continuance. Deuteronomy 28:59

Also every sickness (choli), and every plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the LORD bring upon thee, until thou be destroyed. Deuteronomy 28:61

And the LORD will take away from thee all sickness (choli), and will put none of the evil diseases of Egypt, which thou knowest, upon thee; but will lay them upon all them that hate thee. Deuteronomy 7:15

The writing of Hezekiah king of Judah, when he had been sick (choli), and was recovered of his sickness: Isaiah 38:9

All his days also he eateth in darkness, and he hath much sorrow and wrath with his sickness (choli). Ecclesiastes 5:17

And it came to pass after these things, that the son of the woman, the mistress of the house, fell sick; and his sickness (choli) was so sore, that there was no breath left in him. 1 Kings 17:17

See also 2 Kings 1:2; 2 Kings 8:8,9; 2 Kings 13:14; 2 Chronicles 16:12; 2 Chronicles 21:15; 2 Chronicles 21:19; Ecclesiastes 6:2; Hosea 5:13; Isaiah 1:5

Whether translated as SICKNESS or GRIEF, the definition of "choli" (when we read the verses in context) still means "SICKNESS." Not sadness or sorrow, but an actual physical illness. There's no way around it. Potato, patato, tomato, tamato. Don't take our word for it. Confirm it for yourself.

In churches, Christians are led to believe when Isaiah 53:3 says, "He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief" that it means he is acquainted with heartache, depression or anguish. But that is NOT what the bible says. When you exegete Isaiah 53:3, the bible says the suffering servant is acquainted with SICKNESS. Not spiritual sickness, or metaphorical sickness, but flat out SICKNESS. Christians are led to believe when Isaiah 53:4 says, "Surely he hath borne our griefs" that it means 'he hath borne our sadness, heartaches, sorrows, etc' but that is exegetically incorrect. When you objectively exegete Isaiah 53:4, it's easy to see "grief" is a red herring. The Hebrew word "choli" means, PHYSICAL SICKNESS. Not sadness, depression, sorrows or heartache.

Knowing this information is NOT ENOUGH. Teaching it properly is. Allowing parishioners to be deceived, IS DECEPTION. And any pastor that allows his members to be deceived, is a deceitful pastor. He's committing the sin of omission by allowing his members to walk away with the wrong impression. And letting his members believe Isaiah 53 is talking about the Christian messiah, is DECEPTION, point blank, period.

HalleluYAH to The Most High of Israel for His Truth.

To be continued...