Competitive Police

https://haley2024.org/law-enforcement-authorization-lea.html

The Violent Crime Mitigation

The reader should have a good understanding of the full CRA Structure. All CRA bullet points apply to these five Sectors. The full CRA Structure is 30 Sectors
Switching from the government’s monopoly control to the competition inherent in the CRA Structure would reduce inefficiencies and promote superior business models.
The reader should have a good understanding of the Rating System. Every bullet point could have the statement that the Rating Agencies (RA’s) will give high-quality information from a wide variety of perspectives on that issue.
Keep in mind that everyone in a position with official elected representative authority will entirely focus on just their Sector, roughly 3% of the current politician’s focus
All citizens select their CRA in every Sector. Every citizen pays their CRA fees, and CRA’s proportionally staff the Sector Board. Some fees are on businesses as a percentage of sales or property value.
In the Law Enforcement, the Judicial Authority, and the Prison Sectors, each CRA determines whether they will provide the service or regulate businesses that provide the services.
This full system is at the state, local, and federal levels of government; thus, every current government distinctly has a full CRA Structure. The state-level has Original-Authority and distributes local and federal responsibility/authority.

Violent Crime (VC)

The Violent Crime (VC) Sector Board representatives will define violent crime laws and the punishments for violations of those laws.
The VCs jurisdiction will include physical attacks, physical threats, and certain thefts.
The executive branch of the victim’s Sector 11 CRA must supply the prosecutor. The judicial branch of the victim’s Sector 11 CRA must hold the criminal trial for violent crime.
A VC representative’s full-time job is to investigate as many violent crimes as possible, laser-focused on the best violent crime laws and most effective punishments.
VCs do not investigate as cops, but they explore how the crime affects society, how the police investigated, how it went through the courts, the corrections stage, and recidivism rates.
A violent crime infringes on an individual’s fundamental right to be secure in their person; thus, the VC Sector Board legislative branch is not subject to the 70% supermajority vote; laws are set with a 50% representative vote.
The reader should have a good understanding of the full CRA Structure. All CRA bullet points apply to these five Sectors. The full CRA Structure is 30 Sectors
The reader should have a good understanding of the Rating System. Every bullet point could have the statement that the Rating Agencies (RA’s) will give high-quality information from a wide variety of perspectives on that issue.
Keep in mind that everyone in a position with official elected representative authority will entirely focus on just their Sector, roughly 3% of the current politician’s focus.

The Violent Crime (VC) Sector Board representatives will define violent crime laws and the punishments for violations of those laws.
The executive branch of the victim’s Sector 11 CRA must supply the prosecutor. The judicial branch of the victim’s Sector 11 CRA must hold the criminal trial for violent crime.
A defendant’s Judicial Authority CRA must supply a lawyer to the defendant in violent crime cases.
A violent crime infringes on an individual’s fundamental right to be secure in their person; thus, the VC Sector Board legislative branch is not subject to the 70% supermajority vote; laws are set with a 50% Sector Board representative vote.
The VCs jurisdiction will include physical attacks, physical threats, and certain thefts.
The VC Sector has Original-Authority at the Sector Board level only in the legislative branch relating to defining violent crime and the range of punishment.
A VC representative’s full-time job is to investigate as many violent crimes as possible, laser-focused on the best violent crime laws and most effective punishments.
VCs do not investigate as cops, but they investigate how the police investigated, how it went through the courts, the corrections stage, recidivism rates, and the wisdom and morality of the laws.
The VC Rating System sets a Rating Floor on the crime rate within each subcategory. If the Crime rate is above the Rating Floor, laws must be strengthened, punishments increased, and many Sectors’ funding must increase. For the same reason, Rating Floors are raised with a 50% vote.
The VC Rating System must set Rating Floors per narrowly drawn violent crime rate category.
The VC Sector Board must strengthen the laws and increase the punishment range if a Rating Floor is exceeded.
The VC Sector Board must set a bar regarding the severity of the crime and the standard of evidence for death penalty cases. If the prosecutor declares the proof meets the death penalty standard, the trial must begin 30 days after that declaration, and the trial must go to verdict 30 days after the trial starts. If the court convicts on death penalty grounds, all appellate courts have 30 days to rule. If the conviction stands, the ex*****on must occur 40 days after the conviction date.

Structure of Private Law Enforcement

Competitive governance within every geographic jurisdiction
There are two main concerns with law enforcement, whether private or public. Proper funding and representative oversight must be appropriately addressed. The role of prices always develops a more balanced level of funding compared to politician control. Four representative bodies control law enforcement. The law-enforcement Sector Board and Law Enforcement Authorization Sector Boards will give robust regulations and authorize the police to operate. Both of these Sectors have a Rating System. The free enterprise system and these representative bodies are far better than politician control.
This structure is for most first responders, such as professional firefighters and paramedics. The national guard and others will fit into this CRA Sector.
Part of a citizen’s responsibility is to help create, fund, and enforce the rule of law, starting at age 13.
Funding
There would be a mandate for every citizen, homeowner, business owner, along with almost all entities to purchase police protection.
Volunteer opportunities in the Charity Economy, as an alternative payment, will be available.
Law Enforcement businesses will likely offer many opportunities for service within the Charity Economy.
There would be a Rating Floor on funding your chosen Law Enforcement CRA.
Entities could contract with a law enforcement business regulated by a Law Enforcement CRA to fulfill their obligation.
CRA’s would send CRA-funded staff to the Law Enforcement CRA Sector Board.
50% of the funding could be mandated to come from retail sales taxes or real estate taxes.
The Parent Sector Board can increase taxes temporarily in a crisis with a 70% vote to fund extra law enforcement. At least 25% of the temporary tax must come from a head tax. This tax would be paid directly to everyone’s Law Enforcement CRA’s.

Accountability, Authorization, and Oversight

Every Law Enforcement CRA would compete to manage its law enforcement businesses the best, seeking new customers, thus ensuring free-market accountability.
Every professional police officer and police business receives their authorization, thus badge from the Law Enforcement Authorization (LEA) Sector Board with a 70% vote, which is robust with real power.
The LEA also authorizes prosecutors, judges, prisons, EMTs, firefighters, national guard, and anyone working with inherent government authority.
There are many authorization levels, such as a trained neighborhood watch, guard, patrolmen, detective, master detective, among others.
Most teenagers would be encouraged to use their optional volunteer hours within the Charity Economy to train to certain authorization levels, such as a trained neighborhood watch, a guard, a firefighter’s assistant, an EMT assistant, crime scenario training, among others.
The hierarchy of the CRA Sector Board described below would provide robust oversight.
This CRA Structure’s representative oversight is far more targeted, concentrated, and robust than the current politician’s oversight.
This robust oversight is concentrated on lowering negative externalities so that the free enterprise system can thrive.

The Competitive Rating System

The Rating Agencies (RA’s) would give high-quality information from a wide variety of perspectives.
The RA’s will give citizens valuable information on how the police operate, giving them quality knowledge regarding what police business to hire.
Every person picks which CRA, RA’s, and LEA to trust. That trust comes with real power. These highly representative groups will ensure the respect of civil rights and have genuine authority.
Rating Floors on funding will be measured by capabilities and results, not just dollars.
The Police Rating System will ensure poor neighborhoods have enough police protection.
High crime areas would be mandated to increase funding and capabilities until the crime rate is reduced below the Rating Floor. Increased funding requirements in poor neighborhoods would likely result in additional hours in the Charity Economy.
Original-Authority
The CRA Structure is at the federal, state, and local levels of government. Original-Authority is at the state level.
The state-level Law Enforcement CRA Sector Board determines local and federal authorities and responsibilities.
Police businesses would likely have departments with all three levels of government.
All state-level Law Enforcement Rating Systems will set a Rating Floor on cooperation among the states.
Police Academies
All Law Enforcement Authorization CRA’s (LEA’s) at all three levels would proportionally fund and run police academies proportional to their membership.
Rating Floors would ensure a proper level of education and training.
Each LEA runs or contracts out a police academy of its own. This applies to police and firefighters, correctional officers, prosecutors, judges, EMTs, National Guard, among others.
LEA’s would teach and certify people starting at age 13 on many skills to assist the police and others within the Charity Economy.
Cooperation and Neighborhood Patrols
A badge requires police officers to protect everyone in immediate danger within guidelines.
All police businesses will contribute personnel to neighborhood patrols sufficient to meet the Rating Floors in many aspects of coverage.
While the patrol and police backup will come from any on-duty officer within guidelines, the follow-up investigation will come from the police business a business or person hired.
All police businesses would proportionally contribute to 9-1-1 centers that will likely remain centralized at the Sector Board level.

Higher-Level Investigations

A law enforcement contract must include coverage from all badge levels, from patrolmen to master detectives.
All police businesses would likely have a crime lab but may also partner with other police businesses to share a crime lab.
There would be a Rating Floor in many aspects of cooperation among all police businesses.
The Identity Sector is responsible for all criminal records. Police officers, among others, need to meet well-established thresholds to examine records.

The Hierarchy of the CRA Sector Board

The CRA Structure requires members of CRA’s to proportionally send legislative and Judicial representatives to the Sector Board.
Members, meaning citizens, landowners, business owners, and others with interests (requiring police contracts) in the governed geographic region, vote on the top law enforcement executives.
CRA’s proportionally staff the Sector Board. Less than 10% of law enforcement is at the Sector Board level.
Citizens must make up half the vote for the top executive in a one-person, one-vote system. The other half of the votes come from CRA’s proportional to membership and overall funding, meaning businesses and non-citizen entities will be included.
A Rating Floor would create a healthy respect for the sheriff, police chief, governor, and president of the Law Enforcement Sector.
These leaders will have influential powers to coordinate and lead police officers during standard low-crisis times. Guidelines would increase a police chief’s authority in high crisis times.
A police chief’s orders must go through CRA’s and police businesses.

Law Enforcement Authorization (LEA)

The primary authority of the LEA Sector is at the representative LEA Sector Board level.
Accountability, authorization, and oversight: Every professional police officer and police business receive their authorization, thus badge from the Law Enforcement Authorization (LEA) Sector Board, which is very robust with real power.
The LEA also authorizes prosecutors, judges, prisons, correctional officers, EMTs, firefighters, national guard, and anyone working with inherent government authority.
Any person with inherent government authority must be authorized by a 70% vote of LEA representatives. A 40% LEA representative vote repeals the authorization.
All Law Enforcement Authorization CRA's (LEA's) would fund and run police and other academies proportional to their membership.
The LEA will integrate themselves within internal affairs.
The top LEA leader and the top leaders of every CRA and RA in the LEA Sector will have unhampered access to all records within the entire Violent Crime Mitigation System.
Judicial Authorities
The original authority of the Judicial Authorities Sector is at the CRA level.
The Judicial Authorities Sector is the courts. Each Sector prosecutes defendants within their Sector’s jurisdiction.
The LEA authorizes judges and prosecutors. The Rating System will set Rating Floors on fair judicial proceedings.
For the 29 non-violent Sectors: every sale, contract, or action is taken under the jurisdiction of a CRA. That CRA is responsible for the fees of its court system.
At all three levels of government, the government currently spends about $85 billion a year on the courts. That is about $360 per adult.
A court fee will be included in CRA fees of all 30 Sectors. The percentage arising from violent crimes will be charged in the Judicial Authorities CRA fees and the Violent Crime CRA fees.
50% of the fees will arise evenly from citizens, and 50% will arise from businesses as a percentage of sales. Many Rating Floors will ensure the proper distribution of cases and funds.
The LEA Sector Board and Rating System will employ a few highly vetted, qualified, experienced, honest inspectors that will have 100% unhampered access to 100% of police, judge, and prosecutor files.
A 30% Rating System vote increases civil liberty and fair judicial proceedings Rating Floors. A 75% vote lowers a Rating floor.
A Civil Liberty Rating Floor restricts inherent government authority. A lower percentage of citizens can increase the restrictions on those with inherent government authority.
The Judicial Authority Rating System will balance the negative externality of convicting and punishing the innocent versus the negative externalities of allowing the guilty to go free to harm individual liberties again and leave the victim without justice.
After the proper indictment of a defendant, the victims CRA Judicial Authorities CRA has the power to force the defendant through the system.
The executive branch of the victim’s CV CRA will prosecute a defendant for a violent crime.
A defendant’s Judicial CRA will supply the ‘public defender.’
Prison and Corrections
The original authority of the Prison and Corrections Sector is at the CRA level.
CRA’s of the 29 non-violent Sectors fund prisons resulting from those convicted through their CRA Judicial System.
The following funding bullet points are mainly for violent crimes, in which funding will be split between the city, state, and federal Sectors.
The government, at all three levels of government, currently spends about $95 billion a year. That is about $400 per adult.
Every person starting at age 13 must fund their selected Prison CRA’s $200 a year. This fee will constantly adjust to being half the total prison expenses for those convicted of violent crimes.
Every Prison CRA must accept the percentage of prisoners proportional to their membership.
All prisoners have different levels of expenses based on many issues. Every prisoner will be given a score, and that score will be considered in the proportional distribution.
Every business must fund the Prison Sector Board a percentage of their sales to achieve the other half, currently about $45 billion a year. Roughly 0.2% of GDP.
The funding from the Prison Sector Board is distributed to the Prison CRA’s based on the Prison Rating System’s overall ratings.
Every prison Rating Agency will decide what they consider are the best outcomes and methods; however, low recidivism rates, restoration, compensation, reparation to the victim, and personal long-term prospering of the convicted should be high on the list.
Rating Floors will ensure prison abuse is appropriately addressed.
Prisons and probation businesses have the right to work prisoners. There is a real potential for reducing prison expenses.

https://haley2024.org/police.html