24/07/2026
The World Bank spent three decades warning developing countries against industrial policy. It has now reversed itself, with its chief economist conceding the old advice has the practical value of a floppy disk.
For Pakistan, that sounds like vindication. It is not.
Read closely, the Bank's new flagship report is a warning about feasibility rather than a licence for activism. It ranks policy tools by cost and administrative difficulty. Institutions and public inputs come first, meaning industrial parks, quality infrastructure and cluster-relevant skills. Tariffs, subsidies and targeted incentives come last, because they demand constant monitoring and deep fiscal pockets.
Pakistan has been climbing that ladder from the top down.
Of roughly 7,589 customs tariff lines, about 7,476 carry an additional customs duty. Federal tax expenditure reached around Rs2.35 trillion last year, close to a sixth of the entire tax target and nearly twice what the federation spends on subsidies. The power sector alone absorbs over Rs1 trillion a year in subsidy.
And the return on all this? Manufacturing sits below 12 percent of GDP, and large-scale manufacturing has now contracted for a third consecutive year. The one segment booming is automobiles, up around 40 percent, the most protected activity in the economy, while chemicals, steel and electrical equipment fell sharply.
The instruments are not building competitiveness. They are protecting incumbency.
Pakistan does not need more industrial policy. It needs the industrial policy its institutions can actually deliver.
My column in Business Recorder sets out the three failures and the five corrections. Link in the first comment.