30/05/2026
Tamara is a journal committed to the writing differently epistemology. It is an approach to researching, writing, as well as to academic communityship, prioritizing quality over quantity and knowledge understood as a common good over science regarded as production (Pullen, 2018; Rhodes, 2019; Boncori, 2023; Kociatkiewicz, & Kostera, 2024; Bristow, Robinson, & Ratle, 2025). Following Sarah Gilmore, Nancy Harding, Jenny Helin, and Alison Pullen (2019, p. 3), the journal is committed to academic writing and knowing “concerned with
broadening, widening and deepening knowledge and understanding by giving our ideas space in which they can flourish, create new meanings, help us learn and become human.” We wish to counteract the currently dominant trend favouring linearity of writing and understanding, which not only diminishes the communication process, but also distorts knowledge by ignoring its social underpinnings (Kociatkiewicz, & Kostera, 2024).
We are also committed to doing academia differently (Bristow, Robinson, & Ratle, 2025), purposefully intending to challenge the ruling neoliberal ruling relations concerned with competition of the market of “world class” universities (Lund, & Tienari, 2019). The current pressure to publish in the “right journals” detracts from genuine engagement with the pursuit of knowledge and distracts academics from serving society. Yet academics engage in writing books and texts “that do not count” demonstrating “unconditional love” for the sense and meaning of their work (p. 110).
Resonating with Heather Höpfl’s (2000) call, we recognize and embrace the social, the organizational, and the political as our personal engagement in social sciences. The return to meaning in academic writing and thinking (Alvesson, Gabriel, & Paulsen, 2017) is vital for academics as well as for societies whom we serve. Tamara is a collective engagement in this movement toward a return to mission and meaning, presenting a real and existing alternative which we: editors, the editorial board, reviewers, authors, and readers, share the responsibility for.
What follows is a collaborative editorial composed of reflections from members of Tamara’s community, offered as an invitation to academic conversation. These reflections differ in tone, emphasis, and style of writing: some begin from anecdote, some from theory, some from editorial practice, some from moral or political concern. We have kept the contributors’ texts in their original form so that each piece can retain its own voice and vision. The short editorial notes in italics are to connect these reflections. We have kept those differences visible because a journal committed to plurality should not present itself in a single flattened voice.
Davide Bizjak, Jean-François Chanlat, Gosia Ciesielska, Daniel Ericsson, Anna Maria Górska, Monika Kostera, Michał Krzykawski, Hugo Letiche, JF Jotaefe Matamoros Sanin, Domenico Napolitano, Martin Parker, Alison Pullen, Carl Rhodes, Annette Risberg, Silvio Ripetta, Luigi Maria Sicca, & Martyna Sliwa (2026). Tamara: Invitation to the Academic Conversation. 1.
Full open access! Welcome to read and to resonate
Tamara: Invitation to the Academic Conversation