21/02/2026
Big Promises, Uncertain Peace: The Political Crisis Around Gaza Strip
Imagine a grand gathering in Washington called the Board of Peace — a kind of global meeting meant to bring calm and hope to the war-torn streets of Gaza. When leaders and representatives assembled under bright lights, it looked impressive at first, much like a stage show led by US President Donald Trump. But as the meeting unfolded, many began to feel that beneath the hopeful words, there wasn’t much real progress.
At the center of this drama was talk of creating an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) to help bring peace to Gaza. Countries were called upon to send troops, but in a twist, Pakistan chose not to join this force — a decision many saw as wise, since the mission’s goals seemed unclear and possibly tied more to protecting certain interests than truly stabilising the region.
Some nations, like Indonesia, pledged thousands of soldiers, but they insisted these troops would only do humanitarian work — not fight. That’s because any clash with groups like Hamas could inflame people back home and beyond. Meanwhile, Israel demanded that Gaza be completely demilitarised — meaning its own resistance groups would have to disarm — before any real peace or rebuilding could begin.
Trump loudly declared “we will help Gaza,” yet on the ground the suffering continued, with many Palestinians feeling little relief and still facing violence. As the editorial points out, billions in aid were promised, but with Israel controlling access to the territory, there is deep skepticism about how much help will actually reach those in need.
Worse, whispers of a large US military base planned in Gaza stirred fear that the peace board might end up serving powerful interests rather than the people it claims to help. And because Israel still holds significant influence over the process, critics argue its voice could quietly shape all the plans — leaving Palestinians with only symbolic gestures instead of meaningful change.
In the eyes of many watching, the first meeting of the Board of Peace looked less like a turning point and more like a photo-op — with big promises but little clarity on how lasting peace will ever be achieved.