28/08/2026
At an AI conference in New Zealand recently, about fifty people in the room, nobody raised ethics, governance, indigenous data or diversity. Not one. Amanda was the only person who did.
Over the last few month's we've been on multiple calls with groups of people of all levels, same thing.
We discuss ethics and governance and human led AI. Nobody else does.
Is that an education gap? Priority gap? Awareness gap?
Everyone is in an arms race to adopt the tools at the expense of everything else. Hype over ethics. (Money over people)
Here is what it looks like in numbers.
88% of organisations are using AI in some form.
6% report real financial impact.
75% have an AI usage policy.
36% have anything that qualifies as a governance framework.
A policy is a one-page document. A framework is roles, controls, monitoring, enforcement, and a name next to each one. The distance between the 75% and 36% is where the harm lives.
We do not think this is a technology failure. Every failed pilot we have seen and heard of was called a tech problem and turned out to be a ethics, governance, leadership, basically education problem.
Nobody decided what the tool was allowed to touch.
Nobody decided who was accountable when it was wrong.
Nobody decided how it gets fixed when it breaks.
AI is a mirror with a motor. It shows an organisation what it already is, then does more of it, faster.
The uncomfortable part for business is this work is the unsexy part; slower than tool training and less glamorous.
An ethics session does not fill a room the way an agentic workshop does.
But businesses that skip this are the ones calling for help months later.
Amanda joined Dr. Summer D. Watson, MHS, PhD in The Human Room this morning to talk about the human layer of AI with a global lens. Why diversity matters. Why human in the loop matters. Why we should care about ethics and diversity. And why AI adoption is an education game and human readiness comes first. Check out Summer's Human Room.
Comment Governance if you want to know more.