IELTS In Birtamode

IELTS In Birtamode Amrita Dahal

27/09/2026

The purpose of the workplace is to carry out a particular mission in which each department and its skills are required. Subsequently, people from different generations work together to carry out their responsibilities. This situation has both positive and negative aspects, which will be discussed in this essay. It will also justify why a multigenerational workplace is healthy.

Multigenerational workplaces help optimise each generation’s acumen, where proper guidance, prompt decision-making, cultural diversity, decentralisation, and inclusion facilitate work efficiency. Different generations can play complementary roles in delivering performance. For instance, many organisations dedicate different programmes to different age groups, such as internships, skill-hunting programmes, and consultancy opportunities. One example is the World Bank Group’s Young Professionals Program (YPP) 2027. Furthermore, an organisation is one of the components of society, where different age groups work together, just as different generations coexist in society. This kind of diversity is a natural part of life.

On the contrary, multigenerational employees in the workplace can have conflicts of interest. At times, it is difficult to find common ground for everyone in the office. Gaps in mindset and culture can hinder work performance. For instance, labour strikes, pen-down protests, and lockouts take place in Nepal because the younger generation may find it difficult to cope with the working styles of the older generation.

All in all, organisations should provide employment depending on individual capacity; hence, limiting employees on the basis of age is trivial. Classification should be based on aptitude rather than age. Besides, interests are influenced by geographical location and educational background rather than age alone.

Therefore, multigenerational workplaces have both pros and cons. The positive aspects include inclusive practices and resource optimisation, whereas a negative aspect is the mindset gap between generations. Nevertheless, a multigenerational workplace is a reality that reflects the nature of civilisation

22/09/2026

27. Values of movies some people think that watching movies is a waste of time. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?

People dedicate their leisure time to entertainment in order to cater to their interests and aptitude. Watching films, playing sports, reading books, socializing, clubbing, and participating in philanthropic activities are some of the activities people engage in to spend quality time. The experience of watching movies can be both positive and negative, which is often subjective or contextual in nature. In the midst of this polarized notion, I partially believe that watching movies can be both positive and useless.

People tend to spend quality time watching films to divert their minds from reality to something creative, engaging, fictional, dramatic, and entertaining. A movie is a medium for storytelling where both the storyteller and the viewer can gain satisfaction. In fact, it is a prevalent way to spend free time. People watch films to uplift their mood and socialize. Likewise, the entertainment industry is a prominent economic unit, often referred to as the orange economy. It contributes largely to revenue generation and job creation. For example, Hollywood is a place where movies are produced, and it is one of the major economic activities in many countries. Consequently, watching movies is a way of achieving both welfare and entertainment.

On the contrary, watching a movie is a three-hour commitment, which at times can be challenging for time management. Likewise, it is difficult to meet the expectations of viewers since the content of a movie is revealed only at the end. Movies tell stories and present fiction through which people can build unrealistic assumptions by romanticizing crime, violence, adultery, and abuse. Moreover, one can spend time developing other sets of skills, such as knitting, gardening, painting, and reading novels instead. The intensity of content in novels is higher than that of movies. For instance, movies have influenced crime in society by normalizing negative behavior and hurting the sentiments of various communities. Hence, watching movies can have drawbacks, while other activities like skill development can be rewarding.

All in all, watching movies can help people entertain themselves and spend quality time. At the same time, movies also offer experiences outside of real life. On the other hand, skill development and being productive can be better than watching films. In short, watching movies can be both a good and bad experience.

21/09/2026

Direct Question
It is often said, “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.” Do you think people should adapt to and accept the culture of the country they are visiting? Do you think it is possible to learn about a culture without learning its language?

Culture is the way in which life is lived, whether in terms of survival, clothing, settlement, or entertainment. Influenced by geographical location, every region has its own culture. It is fascinating to learn about different cultures, which is one of the reasons why people travel. However, the question is whether visitors should adapt to the host country's culture. I firmly believe that visitors should respect other cultures. Learning about a culture without learning its language is also possible.

People visit other countries for various reasons, and their reactions to the culture depend heavily on the nature of their stay. As a tourist, it would be civilized to respect the host country's culture, whereas, if the purpose is settlement, sensible adaptation would best serve the purpose. In the long run, culture should be embraced without losing one's individuality or dismantling one's value system. For example, many heads of state wear the traditional attire of the host country during state visits to nurture positive sentiments among its people.

Language is an amalgamation of culture, as it reflects various aspects such as cuisine, clothing, traditions, practices, festivals, landscapes, and livelihoods. Hence, learning a language can provide a comprehensive understanding of the culture of a particular region. However, culture can be experienced and practiced at a superficial or surface level without learning the language. For example, in the food culture of Italy, pizza is now available worldwide. People are familiar with Italian food culture without learning the Italian language. Likewise, polka dots and animal-print designs are accepted globally, irrespective of their particular countries of origin. All in all, a few facets of a culture can be learned after becoming familiar with it, but for a thorough understanding, learning the language is key.

Therefore, receptivity is an important quality that helps people grow. On the other hand, a flexible person can adapt to different circumstances, and it is prudent to respect the culture of the host country and try to understand it thoroughly. Likewise, learning about a culture is possible without learning its language at a surface level, but not thoroughly.

18/09/2026

Some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the internet or books. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Information is the foundation for making decisions. Various disciplines, such as career counseling, weather forecasting, and aptitude testing, have evolved to help people make decisions. Information can either be received from people or obtained from the internet, where the former is the traditional approach and the latter is a more modern and scientific approach. The pros and cons of both sources are discussed here.

Receiving advice from people is the traditional way of obtaining information, where people share their real-life experiences. Such information can be reliable and is based on real-time experiences. However, receiving information from people might not always be pragmatic and may be biased. Similarly, there could be limitations in the type of information available. In fact, government bodies such as Buckingham Palace in the United Kingdom still release palace news in written formats and in person regarding royal arrivals. In addition, news channels still broadcast news where presenters deliver the news by reading it.

Another medium of receiving information is the internet, where various types of content are available. People, in fact, can have limitless access to available resources. Likewise, information in books is comprehensive and rigorous. Most e-libraries are filled with a colossal volume of information, allowing resources to be stored and reused. For example, Google, Wikipedia, and Yahoo are among the most successful online platforms because of their utility. Conversely, accuracy is the main issue with information available on the internet.

Although getting information in person is reliable, it is fairly limited and can be biased. Information should be obtained from the internet to have wider coverage.

Therefore, sources of information are either people or the internet, and the choice of information should be made depending upon the necessity and circumstances

18/09/2026

Q. Success is measured by wealth and material belongings. Do you think wealth is the best
measure of success? What makes a successful person?

Success is the positive consequence of initial effort or intention, and it can be achieved in the short run or in the long term. On the other hand, happiness is the pleasant emotion experienced over the course of time, and people often associate success and happiness with the accumulation of wealth. In my opinion, wealth is a key factor in measuring success and an important aspect of what makes people successful.

Success is influenced by satisfaction and comfort, and it is axiomatic that wealth provides assurance in both. Wealth gives people the privilege of enjoying luxury and addressing their needs. Money, in general, is a tool used to buy goods and services. In fact, wealth is a benchmark that people use to measure success. Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Mukesh Ambani, and Jack Ma, for instance, are famous partly because they are wealthy. Similarly, the British Royal Family engages in many philanthropic activities because of its wealth. Hence, the essence of wealth is to enable people to live fulfilled lives with dignity, which contributes to their sense of success.

Success is individualistic in nature. However, in general, it can be seen as the alignment between expectations and outcomes. Hard work, tenacity, courage, perseverance, and resilience are some of the qualities that play an instrumental role in making people successful. Likewise, health, peace of mind, dignity, love, acceptance, and family harmony help in making a person successful. In a nutshell, the measurement of success relies on its benchmarks. For instance, if money is the benchmark, then Mukesh Ambani is successful. Similarly, if talent is the benchmark, then Taylor Swift is successful. Therefore, it is difficult to give a categorical answer as to what makes people successful. Nevertheless, having one's needs addressed while continuing to strive to fulfil one's expectations can make people successful.

To conclude, wealth is a significant quality for measuring success, as it gives people the privilege to travel and enjoy life. Furthermore, wealth also allows people to live a dignified life with values and virtues. Moreover, people who live fulfilled lives with satisfaction, peace, and good health can also be considered successful.

18/09/2026

In many countries small shops and town centers are going out of business, because
people tend to drive to the large out-of-town stores. This results in an increase in car
use, and it also means that people without cars have limited access to out-of-town
stores. Do you think the advantages of such development outweigh its
disadvantages?

Travelling is one of the activities that people undertake to meet their needs and manage their lives. Shopping is one of the reasons why people travel. Nevertheless, there is an explicit cost that people have to pay when travelling to shop away from local stores in terms of time and fuel. Conversely, the economy can be stimulated when people travel, and I firmly believe that travelling has more benefits than drawbacks.

Firstly, most supermarkets are located in urban areas, whereas residential areas are situated in particular areas far from commercial centres. Urbanisation, therefore, would look more planned and practical. Nevertheless, people have to drive to obtain the commodities they need. Consequently, they use fuel and vehicles in the process. However, a concentrated market will allow large-scale sales, which will contribute to economic growth. This will further create jobs and contribute to industrialisation. Likewise, shopping also helps to break the monotony of daily life and can be fun. In short, when people travel, they can learn faster and better.

On the contrary, time management could be an issue when people have to travel regularly. Likewise, additional transportation costs can make goods and services more expensive and harm the environment. The excessive use of non-renewable sources of energy, such as petrol, will have detrimental effects on the environment. Furthermore, local goods and services can be dominated by international brands, and local shops might not be able to withstand international competition.

All in all, when the market is classified and resources are pooled in one hub, economies of scale will automatically help to uplift people's living standards by utilising resources and creating employment opportunities. The drawbacks of travelling can be offset by the development of cities and the construction of buildings. In addition, roads and parks will be constructed.

Therefore, moving from one place to another for trade is a natural phenomenon, and hence the disadvantages of travelling can be minimized if the fuel used to power cars is replaced by renewable sources of energy, such as solar and electric power.

11/09/2026

Wealth inequality in many countries, the rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer. Why is this a problem? What solutions can be done to solve this problem.
In the process of development, people have prioritized comfort and the sustainability of that comfort. As a consequence, the longing for security has become a phenomenon in which people work to accumulate wealth. Although this approach is futuristic in nature, it leads to inequality in society. The gap between the rich and the poor raises questions about social justice. In this essay, the problems associated with wealth inequality and their possible solutions are discussed.
Wealth inequality creates an uncomfortable situation in society by disrupting social harmony. In fact, wealth inequality is a root cause of disputes and conflicts. For instance, the Gen-Z movement in Nepal emerged with demands for justice and equal opportunities. The youth advocated for the equitable distribution of social benefits and fought for better means of survival. Likewise, the vicious cycle of poverty creates social pressure, leaving many families deprived of basic amenities. In many cases, human rights and the dignity of labour are at stake. Wealth inequality also gives rise to feelings of inferiority and superiority among people. Moreover, basic needs such as food and education are disproportionately distributed, causing unfair competition in society.
Economic equality can work as a stabilizer to maintain peace and harmony in society. The huge gap between aristocrats and the working class can be addressed with the help of government measures such as a progressive taxation system, quotas, and inclusive representation in government. Various schemes, such as old-age pensions, maternity care, subsidies, free education, and special healthcare provisions, can help narrow wealth inequality. Moreover, skill-enhancement programmes should be launched in areas such as tailoring, mobile-phone repair, plumbing, electrical work, painting, and public speaking to ensure employment opportunities for people. Such initiatives can help people break out of the cycle of poverty.
All in all, wealth inequality creates an imbalance in society by dividing people on the basis of their economic capacity. It directly affects peace, social values, and developmental agendas and hence should be monitored by the government through suitable measures to ensure social justice and harmony.

09/09/2026

The bar graph illustrates the education levels of people in different age groups in Glasgow, Scotland, while the pie chart demonstrates the educational qualifications of males and females in the same area.

Overall, the majority of older people have no formal qualifications, whereas the younger generation has the highest proportion of university graduates. In terms of gender, there is only a slight difference between the educational qualifications of males and females.

Regarding age-based educational qualifications, young people aged 16–24 have the highest proportion of university graduates, at 71%, followed by 20% with school certificates and 9% with no qualifications. Among those aged 24–35, 76% have university degrees, while 15% have school certificates and 9% have no qualifications. Similarly, among people aged 35–60, 71% hold university degrees, 20% have school certificates, and 9% have no qualifications.

The figures for people aged 50–75 show a different pattern, with 50% having no qualifications, 20% holding school certificates, and 30% having university degrees. Likewise, among the oldest age group, 72% have no qualifications, while 25% have university degrees and only 3% have school certificates. Furthermore, there is no substantial difference between males and females in terms of educational attainment. Both genders have the same proportion of people with school certificates, at 33%. However, 35% of males have no qualifications, compared with 38% of females. Finally, 32% of males hold university degrees, while the corresponding figure for females is slightly lower, at 29%.

09/09/2026

News Plays an important part of most people’s lives. Why is news so important to people? Why is so much news dedicated to bad news? Should the news focus on good news instead ?

People rely on news to stay updated and to plan their daily lives, whether the subject is the environment, sports, politics, or social events. People’s lives are influenced by these factors in various ways. Bad news often attracts greater attention because it requires people to take action and control a difficult situation. Nevertheless, good news also deserves recognition and appreciation because it provides hope and motivation.

News is a record of social events and has been an important part of human society for centuries. People have relied on news to plan their lives and remain informed, which is one of the reasons why it has remained popular for such a long period of time. Political changes, administrative procedures, health concerns, environmental alerts, and economic forecasts are all communicated through the news. This demonstrates the significant influence of news on people’s lives. Nevertheless, the subjects selected for news broadcasting can often be controversial. Arguably, bad news tends to receive more attention because it generates curiosity and concern. This can further motivate publishers to highlight negative events in order to increase readership or viewership, creating a continuing cycle.

Bad news creates awareness, whereas good news provides motivation. Negative events are reported to prepare people, promote awareness, and ensure justice. Legal, judicial, and moral concerns can be addressed when serious issues are brought to public attention. For instance, reporting cases of sexual harassment and violence against women can raise awareness about women’s safety and dignity. At the same time, when criminals are punished and disciplinary action is taken, society learns from these incidents and becomes more cautious. Such news can therefore serve as a warning and encourage preventive action.

On the contrary, good news also has an important role in society. Positive stories can motivate, encourage, and inspire people. Stories of individuals overcoming difficulties, communities helping one another, or positive social changes can provide hope and demonstrate that progress is possible. Such anecdotes can act as game changers and become examples of positivity for society.

Therefore, news has become a culture and tradition across the globe, where bad news promotes awareness and correction, while good news provides hope and motivation. Maintaining a balance between both types of content would do greater justice to society. News plays a paramount role in influencing people’s judgments, mindsets, and perspectives and should therefore be presented responsibly and thoughtfully. Balanced and carefully articulated news can contribute to a more informed, just, and healthy society.

Address

Birtamode
Jhapa District
57204

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when IELTS In Birtamode posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category