Al Hudah Crescent Schools

Al Hudah Crescent Schools Education gives out moral skills and attitude.

25/07/2026
EXAMINATION SELF-DEPENDENCEMy dear student, you have to be self-dependent.Are you ready to succeed without help in the e...
07/05/2026

EXAMINATION SELF-DEPENDENCE

My dear student, you have to be self-dependent.
Are you ready to succeed without help in the exam hall?

Join our Weekend Online Science Classes specially designed for SS1 – SS3 students to become self-dependent in the WAEC, NECO, and JAMB examination halls.

We teach you how to:
Understand your science subjects deeply.

Tackle questions confidently without external help

Prepare like a champion for exams that now favour only self-reliant students.

Subjects Covered: Physics, Chemistry,English , Mathematics and Biology.

Mode: Online
Days: Saturdays & Sundays
Time: Flexible to suit your weekend schedule.

This is your chance to gain the confidence and knowledge you need to be truly independent in the exam hall and in life.

Limited slots available!
Call/WhatsApp 07030264386 to register now.

Honorary Doctorates and Title Usage: A Study of Academic Integrity and Public PerceptionHonorary doctorates are symbolic...
07/05/2026

Honorary Doctorates and Title Usage: A Study of Academic Integrity and Public Perception

Honorary doctorates are symbolic academic awards given by institutions to individuals in recognition of their contributions to society, leadership, or humanitarian service. However, the increasing misuse of the associated title “Dr.” by some recipients has raised concerns about academic integrity, public misunderstanding, and the dilution of scholarly achievement. This write-up examines the ethical implications of honorary doctorate title usage and its impact on public perception, while advocating for clearer standards and stricter regulation of title representation.

In the academic world, the title “Doctor” is traditionally reserved for individuals who have completed rigorous academic or professional training such as a PhD, MD, or equivalent doctoral qualification. These qualifications require years of study, research, examinations, and scholarly contribution.On the other hand, universities and institutions also award honorary doctorates to individuals who have made notable contributions in areas such as leadership, philanthropy, religion, business, or public service. While this recognition is prestigious, it does not involve formal academic study or research.The challenge arises when recipients of honorary doctorates begin to present themselves publicly as “Dr.” in a way that suggests they have earned an academic qualification. This creates confusion and raises ethical concerns within the academic community.

Academic Integrity and the Meaning of “Doctor”:

Academic integrity is built on honesty, transparency, and accurate representation of qualifications. The title “Doctor” carries significant academic weight, representing years of intellectual effort, research, and verified scholarly work.
When the title is used without the required academic process, it may:Mislead the public about a person’s educational background.Undermine the value of earned doctoral degrees.Create confusion between honorary recognition and academic qualification.For this reason, it is important to maintain a clear distinction between earned doctorates and honorary doctorates in order to preserve academic credibility and respect for genuine scholarship.

Public Perception and Social Consequences:In many societies, titles are closely associated with authority, trust, and expertise. When honorary degree holders use the title “Dr.” without clarification, the public may assume they possess academic or professional qualifications they have not actually earned.This can result in:Misrepresentation in professional, religious, or leadership roles.Reduced trust in educational institutions.Devaluation of individuals who have worked hard to earn their doctoral degrees

In some situations, this practice extends into religious, political, and traditional leadership spaces, where individuals adopt the title “Dr.” without academic justification. This further blurs the line between honorary recognition and professional qualification.

Ethical Considerations:Ethically, recipients of honorary doctorates are expected to use the award responsibly. Many reputable institutions clearly state that honorary degrees should not be used as academic credentials.The concern is not the awarding of honorary degrees itself, but rather:
How recipients choose to present the title.Whether institutions enforce clear usage guidelines.Whether the public can clearly distinguish between symbolic honour and academic qualification

Institutional Responsibility:Academic institutions have a key role in protecting the dignity of higher education. There is a growing concern that:Clear labelling should be enforced, such as “Hon. Dr.” or “Honorary Doctor”.Only those with earned doctorates should use the title “Dr.” in formal academic or professional settings.Honorary degrees should not be awarded based solely on wealth, fame, or influence

These measures would help preserve the integrity of academic awards and prevent their misuse as status symbols.Policy and Government Role:Government and educational regulators also have a role to play in ensuring proper standards. Clear policies distinguishing honorary recognition from academic qualification would help maintain consistency across institutions and protect public trust in educational systems.

The title “Doctor” should remain a symbol of academic excellence achieved through discipline, sacrifice, and intellectual contribution. While honorary doctorates serve as meaningful recognition of societal impact, they should not be equated with earned academic or medical qualifications.To protect academic integrity, institutions must strengthen their guidelines, and society must develop greater awareness of the difference between honorary recognition and academic achievement. Ultimately, respect for the title “Doctor” lies in preserving its true meaning and ensuring it reflects genuine scholarly accomplishment.

Olatunde Kazeem Olalekan, M.Ed

20/03/2026

Assalaamu Alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh

Eid al-Fitr Mubarak!

The Management of Alhudah Crescent School warmly extends heartfelt greetings to our esteemed parents, dedicated staff, and beloved students on this joyous occasion of Eid al-Fitr.

May this blessed celebration bring peace, happiness, and abundant blessings to your homes. May Allah accept your prayers, reward your sacrifices, and fill your hearts with lasting joy.

We sincerely appreciate your continued support and commitment to our school community. Thank you for being an invaluable part of the Alhudah Crescent School family.

Wishing you and your loved ones a beautiful, peaceful, and memorable Eid.

Eid Mubarak!

Management
Alhudah Crescent School

25/12/2025

The ideas of the id, ego, and superego come from Sigmund Freud’s attempt to map the messy inner universe of the human mind. Think of them as three voices sharing one head, each with a different agenda, all active at the same time.

The id is the oldest and most primitive part of the mind. It is driven by instinct and desire. Hunger, anger, sexual urges, pleasure, and immediate satisfaction live here. The id follows what Freud called the pleasure principle: “I want it now.” It does not care about rules, consequences, or morality. In a human being, the id supplies raw energy and motivation, but left unchecked, it leads to impulsive and destructive behavior.

The superego is the moral watchdog. It develops from parental guidance, culture, religion, and social rules. The superego tells us what is right and wrong, what we should do, and what we should not do. It rewards us with pride when we behave well and punishes us with guilt or shame when we don’t. In human behavior, the superego provides conscience, discipline, and ideals. However, when it becomes too strong, it can make a person overly rigid, judgmental, anxious, or constantly guilty.

The ego is the negotiator and the realist. It operates according to the reality principle. The ego listens to the demands of the id, considers the rules of the superego, and then looks at the real world to decide what action is possible and appropriate. It asks, “How can I satisfy this desire without causing harm or breaking important rules?” In daily life, the ego is responsible for self-control, decision-making, problem-solving, and balance.

In a human being, these three are always interacting. When the id demands pleasure, the superego raises moral objections, and the ego steps in to find a workable compromise. For example, hunger (id) wants to eat immediately, the superego insists on manners or fasting rules, and the ego decides when, how, and what to eat in a socially acceptable way.

Which one should be “best” for a human being? Not the id alone, not the superego alone. The healthiest state is a strong, well-developed ego. A strong ego does not silence the id or crush the superego; it manages them wisely. The id provides drive and vitality. The superego provides values and direction. The ego harmonizes both, allowing a person to live responsibly without losing their humanity or inner fire.

In short, human psychological health is not about killing desire or ignoring morality. It is about balance. When the ego leads with wisdom, the human being acts with self-control, moral awareness, and realistic judgment—firm enough to stand, flexible enough to live.

25/12/2025

Absenteeism refers to the habitual or frequent absence of an employee from work beyond what is considered reasonable or acceptable. Unlike planned leave such as approved vacations or official holidays, absenteeism usually involves unplanned, repeated, or unexplained absence that disrupts normal work activities.

In the workplace, absenteeism directly affects productivity, efficiency, and morale. When employees are absent, duties are either left undone or shifted to others, increasing workload and stress for colleagues. Over time, this can lead to frustration, reduced team cohesion, and declining performance. For organizations, absenteeism often results in missed deadlines, lower service quality, and increased operational costs.

Several factors contribute to absenteeism. Health issues, both physical and mental, are common causes. Personal or family responsibilities, job dissatisfaction, poor working conditions, lack of motivation, and weak management support also play significant roles. In some cases, absenteeism is a silent signal of deeper workplace problems such as burnout, unfair treatment, or lack of engagement.

Absenteeism also impacts leadership and planning. Frequent absence makes scheduling difficult and reduces reliability within teams. When absenteeism becomes normalized, it can weaken discipline and accountability, creating a culture where commitment is low and performance expectations are unclear.

Managing absenteeism requires more than strict rules; it requires understanding and prevention. Organizations can reduce absenteeism by promoting a healthy work environment, offering clear communication, recognizing employee efforts, and providing support systems such as flexible work arrangements and wellness programs. Fair attendance policies, combined with compassionate leadership, help balance organizational needs with employee well-being.

In summary, absenteeism is not just about missing work—it is a reflection of employee health, motivation, and workplace culture. Addressing its root causes leads to improved productivity, stronger teamwork, and a more committed workforce.

25/12/2025

Presentism is one of those ideas that sounds abstract until you notice it quietly running your daily routine like background software.

At its core, presentism means focusing only on the present moment, while ignoring the influence of the past and the implications for the future. In philosophy and history, it refers to judging past events solely by today’s values and knowledge. In the workplace, however, presentism takes on a more practical and revealing meaning: being physically present at work but not fully productive, engaged, or mentally available.

In a work setting, presentism often shows up when employees come to work despite being unwell, emotionally drained, or mentally distracted. On paper, attendance looks perfect. In reality, effectiveness suffers. Tasks take longer, mistakes increase, creativity shrinks, and collaboration becomes strained. The body is at work, but the mind is elsewhere. This is the paradox of presentism: presence without performance.

Several factors drive presentism at work. Fear of losing a job, workplace culture that glorifies “always being there,” financial pressure, and lack of supportive policies all play a role. In some environments, absence is treated as weakness, while endurance—no matter the cost—is praised. Over time, this creates a cycle where workers push themselves beyond healthy limits, leading to burnout, reduced morale, and long-term productivity loss.

Presentism also affects decision-making. When workers and leaders focus only on immediate tasks or short-term results, they may ignore lessons from past experiences and fail to plan sustainably for the future. This can result in repeated mistakes, poor strategic choices, and reactive leadership rather than thoughtful, informed action.

Addressing presentism in the workplace requires a shift in mindset. Productivity should be measured by output and impact, not just physical presence. Encouraging sick leave when necessary, promoting mental health awareness, offering flexible work options, and fostering a culture of trust can significantly reduce presentism. When employees feel safe to rest, recover, and think long-term, they return more focused, creative, and committed.

In essence, presentism reminds us that being at work is not the same as truly working. Sustainable success comes from balancing presence with purpose—learning from the past, engaging fully in the present, and preparing wisely for the future.

20/12/2025

Why Many Children Are Smart but Still Failing in Life -The Missing Link in Education

Many children perform well in class, score high marks, and are considered intelligent, yet struggle later in life. This raises an important question: why does academic brilliance not always translate into success or good character? The answer often lies in what is missing from their education.

Beyond grades, children need strong values and character. Intelligence without honesty, discipline, and responsibility can easily go in the wrong direction. A child may be smart, but without respect for others and self-control, that intelligence is poorly guided.

Emotional intelligence is another key factor. Children must learn how to manage their emotions, work with others, handle failure, and communicate properly. These life skills are rarely measured by exams, yet they shape how a child navigates real-world challenges.

Equally important is spiritual grounding. When a child understands purpose, accountability, and their relationship with Allah, learning gains meaning. Faith provides moral direction and inner balance, helping children make better choices as they grow.

At Al-Hudah Crescent School, education goes beyond the classroom. Alongside sound academics, we intentionally nurture character, emotional awareness, and Islamic values—because true success is built on both knowledge and good conduct.

This is the missing link in education, and it makes all the difference.

Address

19 Akinola Street Bariga
Bariga
23401

Opening Hours

Monday 07:30 - 17:00
Tuesday 07:30 - 17:00
Wednesday 07:30 - 17:00
Thursday 07:30 - 17:00
Friday 07:30 - 17:00

Telephone

+2349076711690

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Al Hudah Crescent Schools posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The School

Send a message to Al Hudah Crescent Schools:

Share

Category