23/05/2026
Unfolding the Immortal Tale: Glorious One Hundred and Fifty Years
Amarendranath Dutta (1876-1916)
This man lived for only forty years…yet he survives to this day…
There are few instances in human history where a man or a woman has had a short lifespan on this earth, yet who continues to wield the same degree of adoration or adulation across the span of several centuries. They make a highly fascinating study as to how they could have reached the position they ultimately did, without the benefit of having many years in their dispensation. This brings me to the tale of the fascinating life of Amarendranath Dutta.
Amarendranath, who was fondly referred to as Amar by one and all, had a hilarious nickname. He was called ‘Kalu’ by family and friends, probably referring to his comparatively dark complexion among all in the family. In the large joint families of the times, such names were quite common and nobody thought anything about body shaming then. So, as it happened, Kalu was born into the famous Dutta family of Chorbagan in Calcutta, a prominent Brahmo family, having close friendly ties with the Tagores of Jorasanko. When he was born in his maternal grandparents house on 1st April, 1876, at that very moment was being staged ‘Sadhabar Ekadashi’ in his paternal home. He was always very vocal about the moment, “I was born in Theatre-Lagna…so, is it so unusual that I would be involved with theatre?” In the very year that Amar was born, the British passed ‘The Dramatic Performances Control Act 1876’, to curb the exhibition of ‘Swadeshi’ sentiments on the theatre stage.
As Kalu was growing up, his life was being inadvertently drawn to the tumult of the burgeoning theatre culture in Bengal. In front of his home was being constructed Star Theatre, Binodini’s dream was gradually taking shape. He later reminisced about those times:
After school got over and I returned home, I changed my clothes and secretly used to stand near the new building being constructed and watch it with great curiosity. While standing there, I used to become so engrossed that I began to believe that I had a soul connection with this building, spanning across several past lives. I used to run to this building whenever I could manage.
He was not yet twenty-one when Amar threw himself into theatre, ignoring the disagreement with his family and putting an end to his formal educational pursuits. He faced tremendous financial constraints as a result of this, yet did not give up.
Girish Chandra was ruling the Bengali stage then. Ramakrishna Paramahansa’s disciple was then middle-aged and was a Writer-Producer-Director, all rolled into one. In his mind Amar welcomed him as his guru, “Nearly all the actors and actresses have been tutored by Girish Chandra. I am just one of them.”
The devotion stayed intact even after his guru was no more. On 23rd March, 1915, was arranged a special performance of ‘The Sign of the Cross’ by Star Theatre. This play was initially staged by Amarendranath Dutta’s Classic Theatre, adapted by Bhupendranath Banerjee from an English play by Wilson Barrett, famous for its strikingly colourful production. This time round it was staged to aid the construction of ‘Girish Smriti Bhawan’ at Belur Math. Amrita Bazar Patrika advertisement on 23rd March, 1915, announces:
Special Performance! To aid the completion of the building—already under construction within the holy compounds of ‘Baloor Maut’ to commemorate the memory of the great Apostle and Dramatist Late Babu Girish Chandra Ghosh! The naturally beautiful hands of our kind religious magnanimous and liberal countrymen will, we think be lavish in an occasion like this!
This brings us to the element of controversy regarding the dispute between Girish and Amar, during the former’s lifetime. Sudhindranath Dutta, the famous Bengali poet at the beginning of the twentieth century and the nephew of Amarendranath writes:
…he had proved once and for all that Giris Chandra Ghose, the acknowledged father of the modern Bengali stage held no monopoly of the theatre, even writing his own pieces when, in a desperate attempt to halt his successful competition, he had been denied permission to perform the latter’s works…uncle Amar lacked even the elementary decency of pretending to respect Giris Ghose who after all was his Guru, though he only learnt from the Master how to keep in step with the worst streetwalkers.
Bankim Chandra’s ‘Sitaram’ was staged simultaneously at the Minerva and Classic Theatre, where the hero Sitaram was played by Girish and Amar respectively. Amar publicised his play in a novel manner:
অশ্বপৃষ্ঠে সীতারাম কি অপুর্ব শোভা !
ছুটে যেন রুধিবারে গিরিশ-প্রতিভা !
নটগুরু সনে রণ
দম্ভে করে আস্ফালন
ক্লাসিকের সীতারাম বলদৃপ্ত যুবাI
Roughly translated it would read thus:
Sitaram on horseback is such a magnificent sight!
The horse is as if in a gallop to stop the talented Girish
It is as if a war with the Guru of Theatre
He is full of pride
The Sitaram of Classic is full of the strength of youth.
It is as if an echo of W.B. Yeats—Let us learn construction from the masters, and dialogue from ourselves.
Long after, dramatist Aparesh Chandra Mukhopadhyay was to remark:
Whatever Amarendranath may have done to attract attention, whatever he actually did for the development of the theatre, is unparalleled. He increased the salary of the actors and actresses, appreciated talent, increased viewership, advertised with aplomb. Amarendranath transformed the theatre into a pan-Indian recreational hub. He as if demolished the reign of bureaucracy in theatre and brought in democracy.
Amar conducted various experiments in his plays. One such novel experiment was the introduction of the play within play. In his satire ‘Theatre’ he inducted a scene from Michael Madhusudan Dutt’s ‘Meghnad Vadh Kavya’. That was the first time it was done. Seven decades later, in 1971, Utpal Dutt paid homage to him by introducing a scene from his play in ‘Tiner Talowar’, along with songs used in his plays, one of which goes thus:
ছেড়ে কলকেতা বন হব পগারপার।
পুঁজিপাটা চুলোয় গেল পেট চালান ভার।।…
Translated it would mean:
I would like to flee from Kolkata which has become like a wild forest
I do not have finances and it has become rather difficult to survive.
As time progressed, Amar also tried his hand in making bioscopes, which had newly arrived then. His companion in this endeavour was Hiralal Sen. Whether in ‘Alibaba’ or ‘Bhromor’ or ‘Sitaram’, his creative urge lit up the silver screen of the silent era. An advertisement in ‘The Bengalee’ on 8th December, 1900, states:
The Classic Theatre…through the modern invention of the Bioscope which, as could be easily imagined, has added to the attractions of this popular house of amusement.
Amar was also a pioneer in the use of the newly arrived gramophone records, the ‘rotating disc’ which fascinated the entire mass. The tune of ‘Alibaba’ from Classic Theatre began to be played in homes across Calcutta. Amarendra’s voice rang out from the gramophone, either playing parts from his plays or singing songs from them. Accompanying in the tabla was a young Prasanna Kumar Biswas, hiding behind this pseudonym was the famous Sarod player of the future, Ustad Alauddin Khan. But, that is a different tale altogether…
Amar played a great role in popularising Rabindranath’s early works too. In order to attract the educated elite class to his theatre, he began to gift various collections of books. He bought many copies of Rabindranath’s ‘Golpo’ (published in 1900) and for the convenience of distribution, the publisher Majumder Agency or Majumder Library created several volumes out of the nine hundred pages book, along with different covers. The volumes were titled ‘Rabindranather Golpo Guchcha’ (A Collection of Short Stories by Rabindranath). Another novel feature was that on the covers were printed the title of the short stories included in that particular volume, instead of the traditional way of numbering the volumes or creating a page of ‘Contents’ inside.
He did not stop here…
To popularise theatre and raise consciousness about it, Amar began to publish magazines. In 1895, was published ‘Sourav’, edited by Girish Chandra Ghosh. The writers were mostly people associated with theatre. But, they tried to traverse every genre of literature—stories, poems, articles, novels. Several years later, on 1st March, 1901, he started publishing the weekly ‘Rangalay’. In August 1910, he brought out ‘Natya Mandir’, for which Girish Chandra again wrote an article. In July 1914, he brought out the illustrated magazine ‘Theatre’. Needless to say, though his endeavours of publishing magazines were each shortlived, yet he managed to create a permanent impression on his targeted readers or audience for that matter. ‘Theatre’ especially was printed in thousands and copies distributed free of cost in Calcutta and outskirts, with many people even arriving at the theatre itself to procure a copy. It became a huge success, but publication had to be stopped due to the beginning of the First World War.
Sudhindranath Dutta writes about his uncle:
…uncle Amar’s unconcern with conscious experiment and pure expression did not prevent him from writing critically about his profession; and, in the journal he founded and edited for the purpose, he published an autobiographical novel…His intellectual accomplishments presuppose wide reading in his own as well as in general subjects; and I cannot imagine how he found time for all this.
Amar lived for only forty years— he passed away on 6th January, 1916. Most of his life was surrounded by the magical web of the theatre world. He lived a simple, straightforward, yet a very rebellious life which was hard to digest for many. As Utpal Dutt had remarked:
All those people who refused to conform to the rules of the leprosy-ridden belief of the society, were rewarded by insults. …they were uncontrollable…they were addicted to creative pursuits…it is through their talents that was created the Bengali theatre, which became the mirror of the society, the spokesman of rebellion. They are our titanic precursors.
His nephew Sudhindranath presents a similar picture of his very unconventional life:
No wonder that he would already have consumed a considerable quantity of neat brandy to keep himself going; and at five would begin his evening duties on and off the stage…remained a misguided conformist whose bad habits turned into vice through subconscious self-condemnation. Thus, having lost all his capital in one incompetent attempt to run a theatre, he made his financial distress hopelessly acute by indiscriminate borrowing; he refused to legalize his life-long liaison with the woman he loved, because she happened to be the unacknowledged daughter of a circus proprietor; and, as the consequence of such frustrations, he passed from his juvenile pleasure in intoxicants to become a slave to o***m.
Source:
• Bangalir Gaan Thekey Theatre er Jhanjh: Devajit Bandyopadhyay; Dhrubapada Prakashani, 2024
• Rangaloye Amarendranath: Ramapati Dutta, ed. Devajit Bandyopadhyay; Deys Publication
28/02/2026
01/02/2026