https://www.facebook.com/101660915735106/

Trade with Confirmation, Guwahati (2026)

21/09/2026

Russian President Vladimir Putin has again told Europe that Moscow has “no aggressive intentions” toward European countries and is ready to cooperate and restore relations with its neighbors.

The widely shared line, “We don’t want to fight you; we want to cooperate with you,” captures the message, but it is not a direct quotation from Putin’s remarks. His actual statement was that Russia was ready for cooperation and to restore relations with its European neighbors.

Putin’s words may sound reassuring. But European governments will ultimately judge those assurances against Russia’s actions. Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and the war continues. European officials also point to cyberattacks, sabotage allegations and drone incidents as part of the broader security concerns surrounding Russia. Moscow rejects those accusations and argues that European military preparations are driving tensions.

Putin, meanwhile, criticized recent European military exercises in the Baltic Sea and accused some European leaders of using warnings about Russia to justify increased military spending. He also warned that Moscow would respond if it believed its security was threatened. At the same time, Russia is expanding its military capabilities, with Putin identifying modernization of the armed forces and strengthening the nuclear triad as priorities.

That contradiction is worth watching.

Peaceful words matter. But credible peace requires peaceful actions.

Cooperation and restored relations would benefit ordinary people across Europe and Russia. But lasting peace requires more than speeches. It requires respect for sovereignty, meaningful diplomacy, credible security arrangements and actions that can be independently evaluated.

Trust cannot simply be demanded. It has to be earned.

21/09/2026

Kaitlan Collins has repeatedly done what serious White House journalism requires: ask direct questions, demand clear answers and keep pressing when the president responds with attacks instead of answers.

Donald Trump’s decision to ban CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House was justified by him as a response to what he called “fake news,” “fiction” and “lies.” Importantly, Trump did not publicly identify Collins—or any individual journalist—as the reason for the ban. He described the decision as based on the outlets’ cumulative coverage over the years.

The administration then enforced the ban. CNN’s Betsy Klein, MS NOW’s Akayla Gardner and Politico’s Cheyenne Haslett were denied entry, with press credentials deactivated or confiscated. The outlets have said they intend to defend their First Amendment rights.

Collins has nevertheless become one of the most visible journalists challenging Trump directly. Their exchanges have often been tense, but that is not the same thing as a journalist failing at her job.

A White House reporter is not there to make a president comfortable.

She is there to ask the question that needs to be asked.

People can disagree with Collins. They can criticize CNN. They can challenge individual stories or question a journalist’s approach. That's part of a free press.

But criticism of journalism should be answered with facts, corrections and competing evidence—not by deciding which journalists deserve access based on whether their reporting is flattering.

Strong journalists who challenge powerful people will inevitably attract criticism. Collins keeps asking the questions anyway.

A president’s discomfort is not a journalist’s failure. Sometimes, asking the uncomfortable question is exactly the job.

21/09/2026

When 12 people were murdered in the 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack, more than a million people marched through Paris, joined by dozens of presidents, prime ministers and senior officials in one of the most visible displays of international solidarity in modern Europe.

Now consider the scale of the suffering in Gaza and Lebanon.

By late June 2026, Gaza’s Health Ministry, as reported by the UN health system, had recorded 73,066 Palestinian deaths since October 2023. UNRWA also recorded 392 of its colleagues killed in Gaza. CPJ had documented 209 journalists and media workers killed by Israel in Gaza and Israeli detention centers as of June 25, while acknowledging that verification remains extremely difficult. WHO has also documented hundreds of attacks on healthcare and reported more than 900 people killed in those attacks.

Lebanon has suffered enormous losses as well. During the latest Israel-Hezbollah conflict, Lebanon’s health ministry reported 3,783 people killed between March 2 and June 14, including children, women and healthcare workers.

The exact numbers differ between organizations, continue to change and remain subject to verification. But the scale of the humanitarian catastrophe is not in serious dispute.

So the uncomfortable question is this:

Why did the murder of 12 journalists produce an extraordinary international march, while the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians and thousands of Lebanese have not produced an equivalent gathering of world leaders in the streets?

There have been diplomatic meetings, humanitarian appeals, protests and international condemnations. But there has been no comparable, widely documented display of political solidarity on that scale.

That comparison does not diminish the victims of Charlie Hebdo. Their lives mattered. Their families mattered. The defense of journalists and freedom of expression mattered.

But if human life is truly universal, the standard should not change depending on nationality, religion, race or political convenience.

Every innocent life should matter. And solidarity should not have a hierarchy.

21/09/2026

Donald Trump announced that CNN, MS NOW and Politico were being banned from the White House “effective immediately,” accusing the outlets of reporting “fake news.” The administration then enforced the order: journalists were turned away, press badges were deactivated, and some credentials were confiscated.

But the media’s job is not to give a president endless praise.

Journalists are supposed to question those in power, investigate government decisions, expose failures and hold administrations accountable—whether the president likes the coverage or not.

News organizations can make mistakes. They can get stories wrong. They can be biased, and their reporting should absolutely be challenged when the evidence warrants it. But the appropriate response is evidence, corrections, rebuttals and public scrutiny—not government authority being used to restrict access because a president dislikes the coverage.

And Trump did not stop at three outlets. He warned that other “fake news” organizations could follow, raising concerns about where the line gets drawn next.

A free press will sometimes frustrate presidents. It will sometimes frustrate voters. It will sometimes publish reporting that makes people angry.

That discomfort is part of democracy.

The White House belongs to the American people—not to a president, a political party or a media fan club.

When journalists ask difficult questions, the answer should be more transparency, more evidence and more accountability—not fewer journalists.

Because a press corps that exists only to praise those in power isn't really a free press.

It's public relations.

21/09/2026

Imagine Dragons frontman Dan Reynolds made a powerful statement during the band's May 27, 2025 concert in Milan.

A Palestinian flag was thrown onto the stage. Reynolds picked it up, raised it before the crowd, draped it around himself—and reportedly kissed it as tens of thousands watched.

The moment drew both praise and criticism. But whatever someone thinks of Reynolds' politics, the gesture was impossible to miss.

And that is what makes the contrast with other major artists worth discussing.

Ed Sheeran has said he wanted his concerts separated from politics, although he has since publicly described the situation in Gaza as “catastrophic and unjustifiable.” He has also spoken about the controversy surrounding Macklemore's removal from his tour. So it would be inaccurate to portray Sheeran today as simply saying nothing about Gaza.

But artists still make choices about when to speak, what causes to amplify and how prominently they use their enormous platforms.

Reynolds chose a visible gesture of solidarity.

Others have chosen different approaches.

Audiences are entitled to judge those choices for themselves.

Because silence isn't always meaningless. Sometimes it is a deliberate decision about when—and how loudly—to speak.

No artist is obligated to take a political position. But when an artist does choose to speak, the public is equally entitled to ask why, why now, and why not sooner.

21/09/2026

JD Vance traveled to Council Bluffs, Iowa, on September 18 to rally Republicans ahead of the midterm elections, promoting candidates including gubernatorial nominee Zach Lahn and congressional candidate Chris McGowan. Republican Senate candidate Ashley Hinson was not at the event because of previously scheduled commitments.

Then the crowd-size debate took over social media.

A viral claim said fewer than 90 people showed up. There is no reliable official count supporting that figure. In fact, Iowa Capital Dispatch estimated the crowd at roughly 400 people, so the exact “under 90” claim should be treated cautiously.

But the broader question about enthusiasm is legitimate.

This was a nationally prominent Republican rally featuring the vice president in a state where Republicans are facing competitive statewide races. Vance was there specifically to energize the party's base and urged Iowa voters to turn out in November.

So whether the crowd numbered 90, 400 or somewhere in between, the images can still be discussed without inventing a precise headcount.

And there's something almost amusing about the contrast.

Vance spent the event portraying November as a battle between “commonsense versus crazy” and warning voters about the stakes of the election. Yet the campaign still has to solve the most basic problem every political movement faces:

Getting people to actually show up.

Maybe the crowd was simply modest.

Maybe the photos don't capture everyone who attended.

Or maybe voters are less interested in the political spectacle than party leaders assume.

Either way, one thing is clear: the viral “fewer than 90” number isn't established fact.

And if we're going to laugh at a political rally, we should at least get the number right.

Hahahahahahaha.

21/09/2026

Something deeply concerning is happening across Europe—but the details matter.

The British government is encouraging households to prepare for emergencies that could last several days, including power and water outages, extreme weather, cyber incidents and other disruptions. Its official guidance recommends keeping essentials such as non-perishable food, drinking water, medicines, batteries and emergency equipment available at home. The government's 2026 National Risk Register also covers a broad range of national-security and civil-emergency risks.

Germany is taking the military scenario even further.

German authorities are preparing hospitals and civilian infrastructure for the possibility of a major conflict on NATO's eastern flank. Military planning has contemplated between hundreds and as many as 1,000 wounded service members arriving in Germany each day, requiring civilian hospitals to supplement the country's military medical facilities.

Germany is also building a permanent brigade in Lithuania. NATO says the German-led brigade is expected to reach roughly 4,800 troops by 2027, strengthening deterrence and defense on the alliance's eastern flank.

None of this proves that NATO has decided to start a war with Russia.

In fact, these measures are officially framed around deterrence, defense and preparedness. But they do demonstrate something important: European governments now consider the possibility of a large-scale conflict serious enough to justify preparing their militaries, hospitals and civilian populations for it.

And that should concern everyone.

Preparation can strengthen deterrence by making an attack more costly and demonstrating that an alliance is capable of responding. But military buildup also exists alongside the risk of escalation and miscalculation.

A drone crossing the wrong border.
A missile strike blamed on the wrong actor.
A military exercise misunderstood as preparation for an attack.
A single decision made during a crisis that cannot be undone.

The consequences could be enormous.

Europe needs credible defenses. But defense planning should go hand in hand with diplomacy, communication channels, arms-control efforts and leaders willing to de-escalate when necessary.

Preparing for war may sometimes be necessary to prevent one. But preparation should never become a substitute for preventing the war in the first place.

21/09/2026

Ed Sheeran may now hear “Free Palestine” wherever he performs—not because he personally decided to remove Macklemore, but because the controversy surrounding that decision has followed him onto the stage.

Macklemore was removed from Sheeran’s U.S. tour after using his opening performance to support Palestinians and perform his protest song “Hind’s Hall.” The tour promoter said venue owners would not allow Macklemore to perform, while Sheeran said he spoke with venues at length in an unsuccessful effort to keep him on the tour.

Several other supporting artists—including Finneas, Lukas Graham, Beoga and Aaron Rowe—subsequently withdrew from the tour in solidarity with Macklemore and over concerns about artistic and political expression. Pro-Palestinian protesters have also demonstrated outside Sheeran’s concerts.

Sheeran initially said he wanted his concerts to remain spaces focused on music rather than politics. But the controversy forced him to address the issue directly.

And he has now gone further.

At his Philadelphia concert, Sheeran described the situation in Gaza as “catastrophic and unjustifiable” and criticized what he called systemic injustice in the West Bank. He also apologized for how he handled the Macklemore controversy and expressed concern about venues deciding which artists or content can appear on their stages.

That doesn't erase the controversy—but it does change the story.

The larger issue is no longer simply whether Sheeran is “neutral.” It is whether artists, promoters and venue owners should be able to determine whose political speech audiences are allowed to hear.

Macklemore made his position clear. Sheeran initially tried to keep politics outside the concert. The venues and promoter ultimately made the decision to remove Macklemore. And now Sheeran himself is publicly criticizing Israel's conduct in Gaza.

When an artist tries to keep politics off the stage, sometimes the politics arrive anyway. And when that happens, audiences have every right to ask difficult questions—including whether “neutrality” is really neutral when one side loses its microphone.

20/09/2026

In June 2025, Benjamin Netanyahu asked the world to imagine the threat of Iran eventually producing thousands of ballistic missiles—describing a potential 10,000-ton TNT payload falling on a country roughly the size of New Jersey. The point was to illustrate the destructive potential of a large conventional missile arsenal, not to describe a single nuclear attack.

But that comparison becomes difficult to ignore when placed alongside the destruction in Gaza.

The exact amount of explosives used in Gaza remains disputed. Gaza authorities have cited figures as high as 223,000 tonnes, but that number has not been independently established. More recent United Nations reporting says more than 200,000 tonnes of explosives were dropped on Gaza over nearly two years, while other UN technical analysis has estimated the weight of munitions used at roughly 75,000–85,000 tonnes.

What is not seriously in dispute is the extraordinary scale of destruction.

UN satellite analysis found that by October 2025, approximately 81% of structures in Gaza had been damaged, with more than 123,000 structures destroyed. The United Nations has described the volume of ordnance deployed as unprecedented, while UN agencies continue to deal with widespread unexploded weapons and contamination.

There is also an important technical distinction: comparing conventional explosive tonnage with nuclear weapons measures only one aspect of destructive energy. Nuclear weapons additionally produce intense thermal radiation, prompt radiation and other effects that conventional explosives do not.

So the point isn't that conventional bombs are literally equivalent to nuclear weapons.

The point is the scale.

When Netanyahu asks the world to imagine what thousands of tonnes of explosives could do to Israel, that same moral imagination should extend to Palestinians living in one of the most densely populated and heavily bombarded places on Earth.

A threat does not become horrifying only when it is directed at one population.

If 10,000 tonnes of explosives falling on Israel is an unimaginable catastrophe, then hundreds of thousands of tonnes of explosives dropped across Gaza should force the world to confront the human consequences with the same seriousness.

The lives underneath the bombs do not become less valuable because the bombs are conventional.

20/09/2026

The national average for regular gasoline is now around $4.48 a gallon, but comparing today's price with the Biden-era peak without explaining why either price happened leaves out the most important part of the story. AAA puts the current national average at about $4.48, with crude prices around or above $100 a barrel amid the ongoing Iran conflict and disruption around the Strait of Hormuz.

Today's surge is being driven largely by a major geopolitical shock: the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz, attacks on regional energy infrastructure and resulting fears about global oil supplies. Hormuz previously carried roughly one-fifth of the world's oil and gas, and traffic through the waterway has collapsed during the conflict.

The Trump administration has argued that military action was necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. But whether that objective has been permanently achieved remains a separate question from the immediate impact on global energy markets.

Gasoline also briefly crossed $5 nationally in June 2022 under President Biden. But that surge wasn't simply the result of one president's energy policy. EIA identified rising global demand after the pandemic, low petroleum inventories, reduced refinery capacity and production, and Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the resulting disruption to global energy supplies as major factors. The national average reached about $5.01 in June before falling later that year.

And the claim that Biden simply “strangled American energy” doesn't fit the production data. U.S. crude production reached a record 12.9 million barrels per day on average in 2023, with monthly production exceeding 13.3 million barrels per day that December.

That's the larger point: presidents influence energy policy, but they don't personally set the price at the pump.

Global crude supply and demand, wars, sanctions, refinery capacity, inventories, transportation disruptions, seasonal demand and market expectations all play major roles.

So if $5 gasoline under Biden is used as evidence of presidential failure, today's $4.48 gasoline deserves the same level of scrutiny under Trump.

And if today's price is partly the consequence of a major international conflict, that doesn't make the economic pain imaginary. American families still pay the bill.

The economics don't change when the party in the White House changes. Accountability shouldn't either.

Trade with Confirmation

21/09/2026

21/09/2026

21/09/2026

21/09/2026

21/09/2026

21/09/2026

21/09/2026

21/09/2026

20/09/2026

20/09/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The School

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request