15/05/2026
Yesterday I attended an annual review that left me both inspired and deeply frustrated.
Inspired - because a child who hadn't engaged with education for three years is now thriving. Her school understood her needs, made the right adjustments, and got it spectacularly right. π
Frustrated - because her receiving secondary school stated those provisions would be unavailable. Their reason? They're 'too big' to cater for individual needs! π²
This child receives 30 hours of funded support (offered through school's usual budget and topped up by high needs funding) and yet the school cannot:
β Provide one consistent key adult to build a relationship
β Offer small group interventions
β Create a safe, predictable space for her
Instead? Ad hoc adults only when available!
The school doesn't commission therapeutic services either. So what exactly is stopping them from using that funding creatively?
This isn't inclusion - this is a child being asked to fit around a school's arrangements.
Reasonable adjustments are called 'reasonable' for a reason. A key adult costs nothing extra and small group interventions can be arranged creatively. Flexibility is a mindset, not a budget line.
When schools get transition wrong, the cost is enormous - to the child's self-esteem, to their family, and to the services they worked so hard to leave behind.
We owe these children better than 'we're too big to care.'