16/01/2019
There are perceptions that native speakers of English make better English language teachers.
Myth #1 lies in the equality sign that the majority of learners use to place between these two terms.
While it is beyond the scope of this short post to fully debunk all the above, I would like to briefly outline here why these arguments are flawed.
Knowing something isn’t equal to Teaching the same thing.
🔸 'All sorts of people are fluent, but only a tiny proportion of them are sufficiently aware of the structure of the language that they know how to teach it.' 🔸
David Crystal, British linguist.
Ex. Being a brilliant musician doesn’t make you an exceptional music teacher
Ex. Being an honorable sportsman not necessarily lead to a career of a first-rate coach.
Here are a few more analogies, which come up to my mind:
🎶When you look at a musical score you see scribble, but a composer hears music in perfect harmony.
👑The same happens when you look at a chess board –you might see chaos, but to a grand-master, it is all patterns, right moves needed to succeed in the game.
The most important thing is not whether the teacher is a native speaker or not, but rather if they possess all important teaching skills. The job of a good teacher is not to give you the next “best move” but to teach you to see those patterns and possible combinations by yourself.
"Marek Kiczkowiak, the winner of the TeachingEnglish blog award, argues that those perceptions need to be changed.
1. Students prefer NESTs(Native English Speaking Teachers)
2. Students need NESTs to learn ‘good’ English
3. Students need NESTs to understand ‘the culture’
4. NESTs are better for public relations
1: The first argument gets repeated like a mantra and has become so deeply ingrained that few attempts to question its validity. Yet, I have never seen a single study that would give it even the slightest backing. On the other hand, I have seen many which confirm that students value traits which have nothing to do with 'nativeness', such as being respectful, a good communicator, helpful, well prepared, organized, clear-voiced, and hard working. Other studies show that students do not have a clear preference for either group. It seems then that it is the recruiters, not the students, who want native speakers.
2: On the second point, I believe it's a myth that only NESTs can provide a good language model. What I find troubling is that many in the profession assume language proficiency to be tantamount to being a good teacher, trivializing many other important factors such as experience, qualifications, and personality. While proficiency might be a necessity – and schools should ensure that both the prospective native and non–native teachers can provide a clear and intelligible language model – proficiency by itself should not be treated as the deciding factor that makes or breaks a teacher.
3: As for the third argument, most people will agree that language and culture are inextricably connected. But does a ‘native English speaker culture’ exist? I dare say it doesn’t. After all, English is an official language in more than 60 sovereign states. English is not owned by the English or the Americans, even if it's convenient to think so.
4: Finally, the almighty and ‘untouchable’ market demand. Show me the evidence, I say. Until then, I maintain that a much better marketing strategy is to hire the best teachers, chosen carefully based on qualifications, experience, and demonstrable language proficiency, rather than on their mother tongue. We are not slaves of the market. We can influence and shape it.
As Henry Ford once said: 'If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have told me: faster horses'.
Perhaps most significant of all, being a Non-native speaking teacher might actually give you certain advantages as a teacher.
✅You can better anticipate students’ problems,
✅Serve as a successful learning model,
✅Understand how the learners feel.
Both groups can make equally good or bad teachers. It’s all down to the factors: personal traits, qualifications, experience, and demonstrable language proficiency.
💡Your mother tongue, place of birth, sexual orientation, height, gender or skin color are all equally irrelevant.