Sven Peetz - Agile Softwareentwicklung

Sven Peetz - Agile Softwareentwicklung

Teilen

Agility is not easy to implement. Get some help for re-learning the way of working, changing process Agile software development is mainstream nowadays.

Still companies struggle to implement agile processes and methods into their everyday business. The classic management approaches are very different in terms of thinking and acting. Also developers are not already prepared to make the step from complex system designs to continuously changing software. As an agile coach I will help you to find your way from old-school waterfall thinking into the agile world.

Proactivity kills the learning organization 20/10/2020

The concept of the learning organization is getting more and more popular. Still most enterprises struggle when trying to establish a learning culture. In this braindump I'll take a look on how "proactivity" prevents us from developing learning organizations.

Proactivity kills the learning organization The concept of the learning organization is getting more and more popular. Still most enterprises struggle when trying to establish a learning culture. In this

Self-Organization Demystified 26/06/2020

Self-organization is one of the big buzzwords lately. People are having passionate discussion about wether or not self-organization should be implemented in their company. Some like the idea of increasing teams' autonomy whilst others are convinced that self-organization is harmful and teams have to be managed in a more traditional way. But one thing is overseen frequently: you do not have that choice!
Let's start by understanding what the term actually means:
Self-organization describes how social systems naturally build and sustain structures and practices through autonomous interactions and processes. translated from https://now-new-next.ch/selbstorganisation-was-ist-das/
Now what does that imply? Even though science is still discussing if self-organization automatically is part of every social system, odds are that it is in your environment. There are many examples most of us know. Remember the last time your management team (you may exchange this by taskforce, workgroup, ...) was working on that confidential topic? They really tried to make sure that no information would be passed to others before they decided to do so. When they finally presented their results, almost everyone knew about their work already. Information was passed through office grapewine and there was no way to prevent that.
What happened here? People did make use of an informal structure to pass information. Often this is done based on relationships people have with each other. Probably conversations like "Hey Sam, did you already hear about...? No? Ok, listen, ... I trust you - please do not tell others about it!" And you know that Sam is gonna pass that information to someone else that he trusts.
But this article is not about office grapewine or trustful relationships. The important thing is that within this social system people passed on information in a self-organized manner. They did it because it seemed to be reasonable regarding their personal needs or goals. They did it even though they knew that the organization doesn't want them to. The formal structures tried to prevent them from doing so, but without success.
Once you realize that self-organization happens wether you want it or not, you will find lots of examples surrounding you. I saw hidden backlogs in teams that wanted to work on things that did not fit in the shining OKR-framework the company just installed. They did not change their goals just because that new management framework appeared. I helped product owners to "calculate" effort based on story points. The product owners were asked to post reports about efforts to the holding company. As we never measured effort and did not see any reason to do so, we faked the data, stabilized the existing practices instead of adapting them.
Ok. Self-organization exists wether we want it or not. It is essential to understand that it is not good or bad in general. Self-organization is always trying to fulfill needs or achieve goals that are present within the social system. For companies this means that self-organization can be something great (i.e. the needs and goals of the social system are in alignment with the company's goals) or something harmful (i.e. self-organization leads to structures and practices that do not support the organizational goals). From the company's point of view the second is just leading to more waste that hinders the success (people working on translating story points into measures of effort do not produce value).
In conclusion we should talk about self-organization as an organizational pattern that exists and that we need to integrate actively into our organization. You got a choice there. You might try to install structures and procedures that allow the social subsystems in your company to fulfill their goals and needs while working on the company's goals. That way your social systems have less reasons to install alternative structures and practices suiting their own drivers. And you can try to make sure that the social systems are sharing the companies values and goals. That way self-organization will produce more structures and practices that help the organization to be successful. It's up to you.

Self-Organization Demystified Self-organization is one of the big buzzwords lately. People are having passionate discussion about wether or not self-organization should be implemented in the

Self-Organization Demystified 25/06/2020

Self-organization is one of the big buzzwords lately. People are having passionate discussion about wether or not self-organization should be implemented in their company. Some like the idea of increasing teams' autonomy whilst others are convinced that self-organization is harmful and teams have to be managed in a more traditional way. But one thing is overseen frequently: you do not have that choice!

Self-Organization Demystified Self-organization is one of the big buzzwords lately. People are having passionate discussion about wether or not self-organization should be implemented in the

Creating Involvement During Change 03/12/2019

It is widely known that participation of people in organizational change is very important. But even though most have accepted this to be true, involving others in designing change remains a challenge. Consequences became visible to me when our latest reorganization as agile coaches at idealo started.

Creating Involvement During Change It is widely known that participation of people in organizational change is very important. But even though most have accepted this to be true, involving others

Gaining Focus - a Self-Reflection 14/11/2019

Being an Agile Coach - not bound to distinct teams but rather working with several people within bigger organizational structures - comes with a challenge. There are many topics I could start working on immediately. If I did I would be busy and feel good about doing stuff, but most interventions would not result in meaningful effects. At least this is my experience. Time to change that.

Gaining Focus - a Self-Reflection Being an Agile Coach - not bound to distinct teams but rather working with several people within bigger organizational structures - comes with a challenge. Ther

Bottlenecks As Triggers for Organizational Development 15/07/2019

Product units and teams started to compete for the support of the agile coaches at idealo quite a while ago. The reason was simple. Even though we are 10 coaches we do not have enough capacity to work closely with more than 35 development teams. Some of the teams do not have agile coaches to work with at all. Others do but cannot be supported on a regular basis.

Bottlenecks As Triggers for Organizational Development Product units and teams started to compete for the support of the agile coaches at idealo quite a while ago. The reason was simple. Even though we are 10 coach

Thoughts About Agile Coaching and the Disappearance of Agile Principles 15/05/2019

What does an Agile Coach do? As far as I know each organization is having it’s own definition for the role. People having completely different jobs start calling themselves Agile Coaches. It is time for clarification.

Thoughts About Agile Coaching and the Disappearance of Agile Principles Recently I stopped facilitating most team ceremonies as well as training agility in teams - at the base of the company. Instead I am now working with a

The Tandem Effect – A Supporting Factor for Overcoming Resistance in Role Transformations 08/04/2019

Change has become the daily business of many organizations. The complexity and ambiguity of many--if not all--industries demand new answers. As a consequence, organizations need to continuously adapt their ways of working. More often than not, this means a change for job-roles as well.

If you ever had to re-work your own job-role, you know that this is a hard thing to do.

The Tandem Effect – A Supporting Factor for Overcoming Resistance in Role Transformations If you ever had to re-work your own job-role, you know that this is a hard thing to do. Especially if collaboration with others is a central part of it. In this article I will share my experiences and learnings regarding how expert-role-tandems help to successfully master this transition.

Wollen Sie Ihr Schule/Universität zum Top-Schule/Universität in Berlin machen?

Klicken Sie hier, um Ihren Gesponserten Eintrag zu erhalten.

Lage

Telefon

Adresse


Berlin
10585