Education for everyone

বানরের হাতে লোহা পড়লে সেটি দিয়ে যন্ত্র আবিষ্কার হয় না সেটি দিয়ে সে তার পাছা চুলকায়, আর বাংগালীদের হাতে সোনা ধরিয়ে দিলেও সেটিকে গোবর বানিয়ে ছাড়ে এটাই তার প্রমাণ!! লে বাংগালী!

It's hard to believe that one and half year has been past since our last post. How time does fly !!

Eid Day is the best day among the whole day of the year. We are celebriting this day with our dearest and nearest person. Not only that. Its our relationship can be more improve through this day. Everybody know that islam is the best relegion in the world. And its teach for human society that muslims is related each other. Its can't be deny. So we should keep good relationship with our neighbor. May allah help us to follow the islamic rules and regulation.
Again :)EID MUBARAK:)

EID MUBARAK MY DEAR ALL FRIENDS WISH YOU AND YOUR NEAREST AND DEAREST PERSON.

I don’t even think of a man as a part of Mankind unless I saw them doing good to other. I do not really differentiate any thing between men and animals except benevolence. I see the men in three kinds.
1. The man who helps the other because he takes it (the help to the other) as a vehicle to help himself. And he is valorous autocrat who does not understand the meaning of his benevolence except that make everybody engage to help him.
2. The man who does not help anyone but himself. And he is the inferior like a greedy dog. If he somehow knew that streaming blood turned into coagulated gold he would slaughter all of mankind to get that.
3. The man who does not help anyone even himself as well. And he is a miser and stupid who makes his stomach hungry because it would load his chest.

And number four, the man, he who helps the other and himself too. And I do not know what place would suit him. I do not find a way for him. And I am thinking it’s him whom Greek philosopher Diogenes was looking for, when he had been asked that what would he do with his lamp, which used to be remained with him, when he would travel in the midday under the sunlight. And then he said “I am looking for a Human”.

Taken from AL-LUGATUL ARABIYATUL ETTESALIYAH.
UNIT- 9. LESSON-1. THE LAST PARAGRAPH.

Dear friends
I am so proud that when i see your activities . Then its seemed to me, may be we will be benefited from this group. I wish you my all friends. May Allah help us to learn more educational matter from our brilliant buddies. I want that always you will be active in this group for your self development in English. And I would like to request you all my friends. When you desire post something (especially educative things ) you should not use any kind of Bangla . you have to use English for typing post.
At last, I wish your good health.
and one last thing, take care of yourself.

Principle of the theory of evolution:

Ancient Greek Philosophers such as Anaximander postulated the development of life from non-life and the evolutionary descent of man from animal (man was evolved from animal)

Charles Darwin simply brought something new to the old philosophy. He postulated a mechanism called “natural selection”.

Natural selection is a process that occurs naturally & spontaneously. It preserves the beneficial genetic mutations & leaves out disadvantageous mutations. These beneficial mutations are passed on to the next generations. Over time, beneficial mutations accumulate and the result is an entirely different organism (not just a variation of the original, but an entirely different creature).

Mutations are distortions taking place in the genes of organisms through external effects such as radiation. Evolutionists claimed that these distortions cause organisms to evolve.

Darwin’s claimed that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: like the birds &the bananas, the fishes and the flowers…all are related.

This theory also presumes that life was developed from non life through slight, slow & certain modifications.

Evolutionists claim that complex creatures evolve from more simplistic ancestor naturally over time.

Evolutionists also claimed that life was very simple. That means every complex molecules/structures were attained from a single cell.

Evolutionists claimed that the first proteins formed by chance. Since scientists claim that protein is the first molecule formed in the living things, everything must be formed gradually from proteins

Man and Theory of Evolution:

Charles Darwin put forward a theory that the evolutionary process which produced man in his present form probably took millions of years. The second main point in Darwin's theory is that man evolved from lower forms of animal life. In the beginning there existed only small types of animals which during the course of time were followed by larger and larger ones.

This theory is based on the fact that ancient human skeletons which have been unearthed in various places show remarkable differences from one age to another in the size or structure of the bones or skull. This is taken to indicate that there has been a slow development and progress of the species from era to era. It is also argued that the embryo in the womb, at different stages of its development, successively resembles a number of lower animals such as a rabbit, fish or something else.

Darwin said that man and apes developed from a common link which is now extinct. Haeckel, after Darwin, and also Thinkers of this kind believe that the gorilla and chimpanzee is the ancestor of human being. The Darwinist claim holds that the modern men of today evolved from some kind of ape-like creatures. During this alleged evolutionary process, which is supposed to have started 4-5 million years ago, it is claimed that there existed some "transitional forms" between modern man and his ancestors. According to this completely imaginary scenario, four basic "categories" are listed:
1. Australopithecus
2. Homo habilis
3. Homo erectus
4. Homo sapiens

Evolutionists call the so-called first ape-like ancestors of men "Australopithecus which means "South African ape." These living beings are actually nothing but an old ape species that has become extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, has shown that these belonged to an ordinary ape species that became extinct and bore no resemblance to humans. Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as "homo, "that is "man." According to the evolutionist claim, the living beings in the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus. By outlining the link chain as "Australopithecus > Homo habilis > Homo erectus > Homo sapiens," evolutionists imply that each of these species is one another's ancestor. However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists have revealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus lived at different parts of the world at the same time. Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens neandarthalensis and Homo sapiens (modern man) co-existed in the same region. This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim that they are ancestors of one another. A paleontologist from Harvard University, Stephen Jay Gould, explains this deadlock of the theory of evolution although he is an evolutionist himself.

The Origin of Life:

The Qur'an provides a clear cut answer to the question: At what point did life begin? In this section, I shall set forth the verses of the Qur’an in which it is stated that the origins of life are aquatic. The first verse also refers to the formation of the universe: “Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together, then We clove them asunder and We got every living thing out of water. [21:30]”The notion of 'getting something out of something else' does not give rise to any doubts. The phrase can equally mean that every living thing was made of water (as its essential component) or that every living thing originated in water. Life is in fact of aquatic origin and water is the living component of all living cells. Without water, life is not possible. When the possibility of life on another planet is discussed, the first question is: Is there a sufficient quantity of water to support life?

Modern data leads us to think that the oldest living beings probably belonged from the vegetable kingdom: Algae have been found that date from the pre-Cambrian period, the time of the oldest known lands. Organisms belonging to the animal kingdom probably appeared slightly later: They too came from the sea. The words translated here as 'water' is in fact 'ma', which means both water in the sky and water in the sea, or any kind of liquid. In the first meaning, water is the element necessary to all vegetable life: “[God is the One Who] sent water down from the sky and thereby We brought forth pairs of plants each separate from the other. [20:53]” This is the first reference to a 'pair' of vegetables; we shall cause to return to this notion later. In the second meaning, which refers to any kind of liquid, the words are used in its indeterminate form to designate the substance at the basis of the formation of all animal life.
“God created every animal from water. [24:45]”

Scientific Proofs that Reject the Theory of Evolution:
There are many proofs against the theory of evolution. Some are given below:

Embryology- rejects the theory of evolution. The event of birth is a proof of a supreme creation, yet evolutionists try to make reference to it in defense of their theory. At the end of the 19th century, the evolutionist biologist Ernst Haeckel proposed his thesis, "Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny". In this thesis, Haeckel claimed that living embryos in the process of their development repeat the evolutionary process that their supposed ancestors went through. For example, he proposed that a human embryo in its mother's womb first displayed the characteristics of a fish, then of a reptile before finally turning into a human being. Before long it was realized that this thesis did not reflect the facts. The gills that supposedly appeared in the first periods of a human embryo were actually the human inner ear canal and the parathyroid and thymus glands; the part of the embryo resembling an egg yoke was actually the sack responsible for the production of the baby's blood; the part that was thought to be the tail was identified as the human spine.

These are now facts well attested in the world of science. Shortly after Haeckel proposed his theory, evolutionists themselves acknowledge that his claims were false. Two leading neo-Darwinists, George Ga***rd Simpson and W. Beck acknowledged the invalidity of this theory: Haeckel misstated the evolutionary principle involved. It is now firmly established that ontogeny does not repeat phylogeny. The validity of Haeckel's theory was also rejected in scientific debate in the 1920's. After this, in the 1950's, the theory was completely removed from text books.

Probability of Formation of Protein by Chance- The theory of evolution claims that the first proteins formed "by chance". Probabilistic calculations, however, show that this is by no means possible. For instance, the probability of the amino acid sequence of a protein made up of 500 amino acids being in the correct order is 1 in 10950. 10950 is an incomprehensible figure formed by placing 950 zeros after 1. In mathematics, a probability smaller than 1 over 1050 is considered to be almost impossible.

Genome research revealed that the lowest number of proteins required for life was between 250 and 450.In other words, the minimum number of different proteins that would have to combine together at the same time in order to give rise to the structural features of the cell and performs its basic functions is between 250 and 450. It is totally impossible for between 250 and 1500 different proteins required for an organism to be considered as living to form spontaneously and at the same time. Probability calculations on the subject are given in the following table:

Minimum Protein Number

Probability of Emerging Simultaneously

250

1018,750

350

1026,250

500

1037,500

1,500

10112,500

1,900

10142,500

`As the above table shows, the probability of a living organism with the least protein forming by chance is 1 in 1018,750. (In order to grasp the vast size of this number, it will be useful to remember that the total number of atoms in the universe is 1078.) In other words, there is no chance at all. Despite all these calculations and scientific data, evolutionists still insist on believing in the impossible. The sole reason for that insistence is their determination to deny the existence of Almighty Allah, Who created all things out of nothing.

Morowitz’s probability calculation- The probability calculations cited above are in agreement with a calculation by the biophysicist Harold Morowitz. He assumed he had broken all the chemical bonds in the E. coli bacterium and released all the atoms comprising it, and then calculated the probability of these atoms spontaneously recombining to give rise to the E. coli once again. In this theoretical experiment, all the atoms required are present in all the appropriate quantities, and it is assumed that no other atom can become involved from the outside. Nonetheless, he calculated that the chances of all the atoms coming together spontaneously in a specific order, despite their being in the appropriate numbers and in an appropriate environment, in such a way as to produce an E. coli bacterium was 1 in 10100,000,000,000. This goes far beyond being merely impossible. Such a number reveals the impossibility of even the least complex organism in the universe forming by chance, even if all the conditions and materials are brought together.

Complexity of RNA molecules refutes Evolutionists claims- probabilistic calculations make it clear that complex molecules such as proteins and nucleic acids (RNA & DNA) could not ever have been formed by chance independently of each other. Yet evolutionists have to face the even greater problem that all these complex molecules have to coexist at all.

Evolutionary theory is utterly confounded by this requirement. This is a point on which some leading evolutionists have been forced to confession. For instance, Stanley Miller’s and Francis Crick’s associate from the University of San Diego California, reputable evolutionist Dr. Leslie Orgel says: It is extremely improper able that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time. Yet it also seems impossible to have one without other. And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means. The same fact is also admitted by other scientists: John Horgan said that DNA cannot do its work, including forming more DNA, without the help of catalytic proteins, or enzymes. In short, proteins cannot form without DNA, but neither can DNA form without proteins.

Fossil Record- also rejects the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution asserts that living things descended from a common ancestor. According to the theory, living beings differentiated from each other over a very long time with linked, gradual modifications. If this assertion were true, then numerous "intermediary species" should have lived in history linking different living species. For instance, if birds had indeed evolved from reptiles, then billions of creatures which were half-bird/half-reptile should have lived throughout history.

The most important example of evolutionists' alleged intermediate forms is a fossil bird called Archaeopteryx. Focusing on the teeth and claws of Archaeopteryx, evolutionists allege that this creature is an intermediate form between reptiles and birds.

The late Stephen Jay Gould, Professor of Geology and Paleontology at Harvard University said that- The history of most fossil species includes two features inconsistent with gradualism: 1. Statis. Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear… 2. Sudden. Appearance. In any local area, a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and 'fully formed. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils.

Mutation- Mutations are genetic accidents that occur in living things. Like all accidents, they cause harm and destruction. "Evolution" through mutation is as unlikely as the improvement of a clock by a hammer blow. Realizing that natural selection has no evolutionary function, evolutionists introduced the concept of "mutation" to their claim in the 20th century. Mutations are distortions taking place in the genes of organisms through external effects such as radiation. Evolutionists claim that these distortions cause organisms to evolve. Scientific findings, however, reject this claim, because all observable efficient mutations cause only harm to living things. All mutations that take place in humans result in mental or physical deformities such as mongolism (Down's syndrome), albinism, dwarfism, or diseases such as cancer.
Another reason why it is impossible for mutations to cause living things to evolve is that mutations do not add any new genetic information to an organism. Mutations cause existing genetic information to be randomly reshuffled similar to playing cards. In other words, no new genetic information is introduced by mutations.

DNA Double Helix- Its Existence Alone Defeats any Theory of Evolution-The scientific reality of the DNA double helix can single-handedly defeat any theory that assumes life arose from non-life through materialistic forces. Evolution theory has convinced many people that the design in our world is merely "apparent" -- just the result of random, natural processes. However, with the discovery, mapping and sequencing of the DNA molecule, we now understand that organic life is based on vastly complex information code, and such information cannot be created or interpreted without a Master Designer at the cosmic keyboard.

Formation of a Single Protein- Not only do people now know that a single protein is far too complex ever to come into being spontaneously, they are also aware that neither a protein, DNA, RNA or any other minute component of the cell will serve any purpose in the absence of the cell as a whole. This fact is of great important in terms of the defeat of Darwinism:
• DNA is essential for a single protein to form
• DNA cannot form without protein
• Protein cannot form without DNA
• Protein cannot form in the absence of protein
• Sixty separate proteins are needed for a single protein to form
• Protein cannot form in the absence of any one of these
• Protein cannot form with no ribosome
• Protein cannot form with no RNA
• Protein cannot form without ATP
• Protein cannot form without the mitochondria to manufacture ATP
• Protein cannot form without the cell nucleus
• Protein cannot form without the cytoplasm
• Protein cannot form in the absence of a single organelle in the cell
• And proteins are necessary for all the organelles in the cell to exist and function
• Here can be no protein without these organelles.
This is an interconnected system that has to function simultaneously. You cannot have one part without the other. Even if one component exists, it will still not function in the absence of the others.
The whole cell is necessary for a protein to form. It is impossible for a single protein to form in the absence of the whole cell, with its perfect complex structure we see today, but of which we understand only a very small part. Even if this protein did form spontaneously (which is in any case impossible), it will still serve no purpose. It will just wander around alone and die. Therefore, Dawkins’ claim of “a spontaneously replicating molecule” is utterly ludicrous and solely intended to deceive. No molecule in the human cell possesses the ability to replicate itself spontaneously without the help of any other molecule. It is an evident fact that life came into being from nothing with the infinite intelligence, knowledge and might of Allah. This fact, obvious to reason and good conscience, is also corroborated by countless scientific data today. The following is revealed in the Qur’an about our Lord’s matchless Creation: [Allah is] the Originator of the heavens and earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, “Be!” and it is. (2:117)

Qur'an on the Creation of Man:
Allah says in the Holy Qur'an: “Does not man remember that We created him before, when he was naught? (19:68)”.Human birth now takes place from the seed of the male. This verse refers to the first original creation of the species, or the first man. It should be carefully noted that the Qur'an does not say that existence was created from non-existence. It says that prior to the stage when matter and other things came into being; there was a stage when nothing existed. We say that a chair can be made from a piece of wood; or we say that a chain can be made from a piece of iron. Here we have matter in one form which can be utilized to make another article. Atheists often raise the objection that it is not possible to shape out anything from nothing. This, however, is not what is meant by the Qur'an. What is meant is that prior to the creation of the universe there was a stage when nothing existed. Then came creation and the creation of man. God has not given knowledge to man as to how this came about, possibly because it is beyond the comprehension of man to grasp. If man could visualize how creation took place then he would be in a position to create man himself.

Creation of first man- There is only one verse in the whole Qur'an which describes the birth of Adam as somewhat miraculous. This verse says: "Surely Isa is like Adam in the sight of Allah. He created him of clay, and then said to hire: `Be! And he was". (3: 59)

This verse has come in the wake of other verses relating to the Prophet Isa. The Qur'an invariably stresses that Isa was created by Allah and that he was not His son. The fact that he was born of Virgin Maryam and had no father is no proof of his being the son of Allah. His birth was a supernatural event, which took place by Allah's will, in the same way as another supernatural event, which is the birth of Adam, the living being having Divine spirit, occurred earlier.

Hence from the Qur'anic point of view the miraculous birth of Adam, the first living being gifted with Divine spirit, should not be construed to mean that the Qur'an is opposed to the theory of the emergence of the existing things of the world or the birth of living organisms on the basis of evolution. All that it means is that the emergence of man in an extraordinary way was a special favor of Allah.

The only point which has given rise to the conception that there is a contradiction between religion and the general principles of evolution is that the book of Genesis of Old Testament and certain verses of the Qur'an apparently indicate that all men existing on the earth are the progeny of Adam, who was created independently and not evolved from any previous living beings. For example-

“O mankind! Be careful of your duty to your Guardian-Lord, who created you from a single person, created, of like nature, His mate, and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women…….”(4:1)

Stages of creation of man:

“O mankind! if you have a doubt about the Resurrection, (consider) that We created you out of dust, then out of s***m, then out of a leech-like clot, then out of a little lump of flesh, partly formed and partly unformed, in order that We may manifest (our power) to you; and We cause whom We will to rest in the wombs for an appointed term, then do We bring you out as babes, then (foster you) that you may reach your age of full strength; and some of you are called to die, and some are sent back to the feeblest old age…….”(22:5)

“Man We did create from a quintessence (of clay); Then We placed him as (a drop of) s***m in a place of rest, firmly fixed; Then We made the s***m into a clot of congealed blood; then of that clot We made a (fetus) lump; then we made out of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh; then we developed out of it another creature. So blessed be Allah, the best to create! ; After that, at length you will die”
(23:12-15)

“He Who has made everything which He has created most good: He began the creation of man with (nothing more than) clay; And made his progeny from a quintessence of the nature of a fluid despised; But He fashioned him in due proportion, and breathed into him something of His spirit. And He gave you (the faculties of) hearing and sight and feeling (and understanding): little thanks do you give!”(32:7-9)

In brief the process of creation of man in Qur’anic verses:
1st stage : Reaction takes place between s***m and egg.
2nd stage: Then form a leech like clot or clot of blood.
3rd stage: Then form a little lump of flesh or chewed like lump.
4th stage: Lump converts into bones and bones covered with flesh.
5th stage: Appearance of hearing, sight and feelings.
6th stage: Then it turns into another creature that means into human being.

So after Adam and his company Eve, every man has created through a long term step by step process from the existing man. Not by a chance or spontaneously or from lower animals. That means man was created from an origin of his own species. So Darwin’s claim that man was created or originated or evolved from lower animal like gorilla or chimpanzee is fully contradictory to The Qur’naic verses.

Conclusion: An unbiased investigator, whether he supports the theory of evolution or opposes it, has to admit that:
(1) As far as we know, all the existing things of the world, including the living organisms, have a historical succession in accordance with the degree of their evolution. (2) We are aware of many cases in which a more developed organism is the progeny of a less developed one.
(3) There are indications on the basis of which it may be presumed that this is a general rule applicable to all existing things.
(4) On the basis of the doctrine, that the world has an Almighty Creator, who has brought the universe into existence and who manages it, there is a complete possibility that certain developed species might have come into existence. Of course, in this case the creation of the developed species is not to be the outcome of any mental development of the Creator or His gaining any experience. It is to be only on the basis that evolutionary motion exists in the creative design of the world. In other words, it is the will of Allah that gradually more and more developed species should come into being, in the same way as there exists an evolutionary motion in the development of an embryo.

Moreover, those who don’t believe in only one GOD and believe the theory of evolution, Allah says for them:

“As for those who disbelieve, it makes no difference to them whether you warn them or do not warn them, they will not believe. God has sealed up their hearts and hearing and over their eyes is a blindfold. They will have a terrible punishment.” (2: 6-7)

“……They have hearts they do not understand with. They have eyes they do not see with. They have ears they do not hear with. Such people are like cattle. No, they are even further astray! They are the unaware.” (7: 179).

“May Allah save us from the hell fire and give us eternal pleasure.” Ameen.