26/05/2026
A study published this year by the European Journal of Education examined the effects of private tutoring here in Sydney, Australia. Unsurprisingly, the findings were uncomfortable.
Researchers found that most tutoring— the ones that are household names— prioritise getting to an answer over developing the critical thinking behind it. Students walk away knowing formulas, patterns, and acronyms without fully understanding why. Students read text not for meaning but for answers to questions they have to attempt. One teacher in the research described this kind of tutoring as the kind that crushes curiosity. Another said she could instantly tell from reading a student’s work whether they had been coached or not.
However, the research did also show something which the critics of tutoring don’t often acknowledge — that families (especially those new to Australia) turned to tutoring not out of anxiety alone but because schools aren’t competitive enough. There’s not enough challenge, there’s not enough feedback. There’s not enough preparation. There’s not enough monitoring of progress for when it matters.
We originally started Foci Education 6 and a half years ago because we believed that both things could be true at once — that the landscape of tutoring has a real problem, and that the answer isn’t less support (as some teachers would like to believe), but better support.
We don’t drill, hand out templates or teach students to perform understanding they don’t have. We teach them to actually think, and it’s bloody hard. The results just happened to follow.
Ho, C.2026. “Undermining Classroom Teaching? Teachers’ Perspectives on the Impact of Private Tutoring on School Education in Sydney, Australia.” European Journal of Education61, no. 2: e70597. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70597.