Kirks Law Corner LLC

Did you know...

We have the rights to Petition, Remonstrate and Address.

Petition is like a Political Lawsuit...it has a Prayer for Relief. This can be either a Public or Private Bill.

Remonstrance is how we Protest a certain Bill. We give statement of facts as why we are Protesting a certain Bill.

Protest is a formal written document declaring something unlawful is about to happen or already has happened.

Address is when we speak (2-3 minutes) about our Petition, Remonstrance or formal written Protest.

Putting things in writting is way more effective and follows both our Rights and due process of Law.

Kirk's Law Corner LLC is creating Educational Materials | Patreon

Kirk's Law Corner LLC is creating Educational Materials | Patreon Become a patron of Kirk's Law Corner LLC today: Get access to exclusive content and experiences on the world’s largest membership platform for artists and creators.

Kirk's Law Corner LLC is creating Educational Materials | Patreon

Please share!!! I know a lot of people are missing me on FB and YT.
People can find me here

My Patreon Private, Wednesday Night Workshop for those in Tier 3 & 4
https://www.patreon.com/kirkslawcorner

Follow me on Telegram

KLC Media Group News https://t.me/KLCMEDIAGROUPNEWS

Kirk's Law Corner LLC is creating Educational Materials | Patreon Become a patron of Kirk's Law Corner LLC today: Get access to exclusive content and experiences on the world’s largest membership platform for artists and creators.

Now the real question is "who are the People?"

Do you know that there is more parts or branches of our Republican form of government than just the Legislature, Executive & Judicial? Do you know that the General Assembly includes elected officials and the Grand Jury (minimum 27 people) as well as at the County level there are elected officials and the Petite Jury (minimum of 13 people)

The people, having ALL Political Power which includes the right to alter, reform or abolish any Thing at any time we deem it necessary.

Do you know how that power is claimed and exercised?

If you want to know more send me an email [email protected]

There is no Personal Jurisdiction over man.

CRUDEN v. NEALE 2N.C. (1796) 2 SE 70 "Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent"

S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54
Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People
– Supreme Court of the United States 1795

"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary,
having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any
law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
[--Not the "United States Supreme Court" –ed.]

Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)
No. 340
Argued January 4, 5, 1906
Decided March 12, 1906

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Syllabus

Under the practice in this country, the examination of witnesses by a Federal grand jury need not be preceded by a presentment or formal indictment, but the grand jury may proceed, either upon their own knowledge or upon examination of witnesses, to inquire whether a crime cognizable by the court has been committed, and, if so, they may indict upon such evidence. In summoning witnesses, it is sufficient to apprise them of the names of the parties with respect to whom they will be called to testify, without indicating the nature of the charge against them or laying a basis by a formal indictment.

(Last part of 73)

Having already held that, by reason of the immunity act of 1903, the witness could not avail himself of the Fifth Amendment, it follows that he cannot set up that amendment as against the production of the books and papers, since, in respect to these, he would also be protected by the immunity act. We think it quite clear that the search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment was not intended to interfere with the power of courts to compel, through a subpoena duces tecum, the production, upon a trial in court, of documentary evidence. As remarked in Summers v. Moseley, 2 Cr. & M. 477, it would be "utterly impossible to carry on the administration of justice" without this writ. The following authorities are conclusive upon this question: Amey v. Long, 9 East 473; Bull v. Loveland,

Page 201 U. S. 74

10 Pick. 9; United States Express Co. v. Henderson, 69 Iowa 40; Greenleaf on Evidence 469a.

If, whenever an officer or employee of a corporation were summoned before a grand jury as a witness, he could refuse to produce the books and documents of such corporation upon the ground that they would incriminate the corporation itself, it would result in the failure of a large number of cases where the illegal combination was determinable only upon the examination of such papers. Conceding that the witness was an officer of the corporation under investigation, and that he was entitled to assert the rights of corporation with respect to the production of its books and papers, we are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the State. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.

Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the State. It is presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of the public. It receives certain special privileges and franchises, and holds them subject to the laws of the State and the limitations of its charter. Its powers are limited by law. It can make no contract not authorized by its charter. Its rights to

Page 201 U. S. 75

act as a corporation are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation. There is a reserved right in the legislature to investigate its contracts and find out whether it has exceeded its powers. It would be a strange anomaly to hold that a State, having chartered a corporation to make use of certain franchises, could not, in the exercise of its sovereignty, inquire how these franchises had been employed, and whether they had been abused, and demand the production of the corporate books and papers for that purpose. The defense amounts to this: that an officer of a corporation which is charged with a criminal violation of the statute may plead the criminality of such corporation as a refusal to produce its books. To state this proposition is to answer it. While an individual may lawfully refuse to answer incriminating questions unless protected by an immunity statute, it does not follow that a corporation, vested with special privileges and franchises, may refuse to show its hand when charged with an abuse of such privileges.

Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

Texas wins federal injunction against Biden’s vaccine, mask mandates

https://youtu.be/VbdB5J1g3nc

Texas wins federal injunction against Biden’s vaccine, mask mandates Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton claims President Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate doesn’t have legal authority. to Fox News! https://bit.ly/...

If,
1. all political power is inherent in the people, to alter, reform or abolish any Thing at any time we deem it neccessary Article I section 2

2. we redress our grievances through Petitions (political lawsuit, not judicial) to call them in to peaceably assemble the Legislature, so that we can consult for our common good and to INSTRUCT our public servants to discharge the Duties of their Office to alter, reform or abolish Things. Article I section 10

Then how can a man that can't follow the Law as it is written to seek Justice, having ALL the power now, exercise the privileges of any public servant emolument?

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/cdc-now-admits-no-gold-standard-for-the-isolation-for-any-virus

Agenda 21 and 2030. New World Order. This isn't about left or right. This is much bigger than party lines. Which in our Republic, parties are not supposed be there in government.

I think we need to return to some fundamental principles of Law.

1. Rights are the Law. More specifically the American Common Law which is the real "Law" that Law of the Land and due process of Law refers to. This is the Law that government was instituted to secure and is supposed to be "self evident", common sense Law. Bills of Rights (plural, more than one, all) and those merely DECLARATORY of the common law and are MANDATORY and need no legislation. Constitutional provisions stand on a higher plane than statutes and are MANDATORY. American Jurisprudence volume 16 Constitutional Law section 100.

2. Government as a whole is to DEFEND, PROTECT our Rights from what may cause injury, loss or harm from foreign invasion and domestic Violence (Article IV section 4)...which is actually "internal insurrection", an attempt by Public servants to overthrow the Constitutions, which is the Law of creation of government, and war against the people. The Constitutions are to control the minds of Public servants and dictate the Emoluments of the respective offices. Constitutions are the supreme written will of the people and are ABSOLUTE. American Jurisprudence volume 16 Constitutional Law section 1.

3. The Legislature (which includes Congress) has NO AUTHORITY to alter the Fundamental Law (common law, Rule of Law which are Maxims of Law...fundamental principles of Law) or the Constitutions, and those vest with any authority that do, commit capital offenses (Treason, punishable by death). Law of Nations Book I chapter III section 34.

4. Statutes are for government civil conduct. To control the mind of government or Public servants. It is to dictate the Emoluments of the respective offices and the non-elected officials. Statutes do NOT apply to the people in the Private because that's ALL color of law. American Jurisprudence volume 16 Constitutional Law section 2.

5. No Bills of Attainder (also includes Bills of Pains and Penalties) which is Legislation that says "this is a crime and here is the punishment". Article I sections 9 (Federal) & 10 (States).

This is not the first time in history that we have been here. This conduct has been going on since 400BC and as of some of my recent reading and research goes clear back to 2400BC.

Magna Carta 1215 The Great Charter of Liberty was the proverbial line drawn in the sand that all of mankind are FREE, EQUAL and have Liberty of conscience. The foundation of Liberty. Reading between the lines, a separation from the Roman Catholic Church, Catholicism and the Roman Civil Law of 600AD. The Crown Temple BAR. Ecclesiastical Law. The Law of souls and Trusts. A foreign jurisdiction in our Republic. This is why our Founders put NO TITLES OF NOBILITY in our Republic. Article I section 9 clause 8 and the original Article the Thirteenth (XIII) Ratified 1819, which was the cause of the war of 1812 and the fire at the White House in an attempt to destroy the Article V Constitutional Convention records, because it kick these Crown Temple BAR Title of Nobility holding Esquires out of our Republic. Which is also prima facia evidence of how we are SUPPOSED TO MAKE LAW. This is what is at the ROOT of our problems WORLDWIDE.

The American BAR Association was created in 1878...imagine that, right after or during the unlawful "Reconstruction Acts" which comes in conflict with number 3 above. Government/Congress did/does NOT POSSES THAT POWER. FRAUD and fraud vitiates every Thing from its inception, void ab initio, from the inception/beginning. U.S. v Throckmorton and Marbury v Madison and Article VI clause 2 "and the judges in every State SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY, that any Thing in the Constitution or laws of a state to the contrary, notwithstanding", meaning NO STANDING IN LAW (internal) OR AT LAW (at common law) see Article III section 2 (suits in law and equity) and Article the Seventh, (VII) aka VII Amendment (suits at commonlaw) must be heard in a common law court BEFORE it can be heard in ANY COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.

Happy Thanksgiving to my friends and your family.

Lawful Notification Letters is where it is at. It is the FIRST step of due process of law.

Notice and Opportunity

https://www.facebook.com/100064539227808/posts/267314825429823/?sfnsn=mo

Judicial Watch announced that it sent letters to election officials in 14 counties and five states—Arkansas, California, Illinois, New York, and Oregon—notifying them of evident violations of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA). The letters detail how these states’ own reported data show that their counties removed an “absurdly low” or “impossible” number of inactive voter registrations under key provisions of the NVRA. The letters threaten federal lawsuits unless the violations are corrected in a timely fashion.
“Once again, Judicial Watch is leading the charge for clean voter rolls and election integrity,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These letters are just the beginning of another sweep, in federal court if necessary, to clean voter rolls throughout the country.”
READ: http://jwatch.us/TnWPNg

This is why reading means reading.

Read through the historical documents going back to 1215 with the Magna Carta, the first Charter of Virginia 1606, 1609, 1611, English Bill of Rights 1689, Declaration of the Causes and Necessities for taking up Arms July 6, 1775 (this one will really open your eyes), Virginia Declaration of Rights June 12, 1776, Virginia Constitution June 29, 1776, Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, then you will have a better understanding of the real Law that is the "setteled" Law of the Nation called America. Then you will have a better idea of how things are supposed to be and anything that comes in conflict with the real Law is void for any effect, but it's up to us to educate ourselves on the truth, the real Law and defend it.

If you don't have this knowledge you have no power.

Jury Finds Kyle Rittenhouse Not Guilty on All Counts

He has been ACQUITTED ON ALL COUNTS.

https://www.newsmax.com/headline/rittenhouse-not-guilty-all-counts-acquitted/2021/11/16/id/1044925/

Jury Finds Kyle Rittenhouse Not Guilty on All Counts Breaking: Kyle Rittenhouse has been acquitted of all charges after pleading self-defense in the deadly Kenosha, Wisconsin, shootings that became a flashpoint in the nation's debate over guns, vigilantism and racial injustice. The jury came back with its verdict after close...

"The Idaho Code is not the law" see Peterson v Peterson Idaho Supreme Court 2014. (I have the case file if you want it)

The Common Law is the real Law. Rights are Law.

Declarations of Rights are just merely declaratory of the common law. American Jurisprudence volume 16 Constitutional Law section 100 (2017 update)

"Statutes are for government civil conduct"
American Jurisprudence volume 16 Constitutional Law section 2 (2017 update)

The truth is that our form of government has been hijacked and fundamentally altered.

Why does the Legislature make amendments to the Idaho Code if the Idaho Code is not the law?

P.s. why does the Idaho Code have a copyright?